BDS. Boycott, also by Universities (old version) Reageer (0) 29-1-2010
As of today there has been made a new section for BDS and Universities. Nieuwe sectie voor BDS en Universiteiten hier . ---------------------------------------------------------------
Facebook pagina over dit onderwerp ---------------------------------------------------------------
Ha'aretz Jordanian protesters burning an Israeli flag at an anti-Israel protest in Amman last year. (Reuters) By Barak Ravid 12-2-2010
Israel
is facing a global campaign of delegitimization, according to a report
by the Reut Institute, made available to the cabinet on Thursday. The
Tel Aviv-based security and socioeconomic think tank called on
ministers to treat the matter as a strategic threat. The
report cites anti-Israel demonstrations on campuses, protests when
Israeli athletes compete abroad, moves in Europe to boycott Israeli
products, and threats of arrest warrants for Israeli leaders visiting
London.
Reut says the campaign is the work of a worldwide
network of private individuals and organizations. They have no
hierarchy or overall commander, but work together based on a joint
ideology - portraying Israel as a pariah state and denying its right to
exist.
Reut lists the network's major hubs - London, Brussels,
Madrid, Toronto, San Francisco and the University of California,
Berkeley. The network's activists - "delegitimizers" the report dubs
them - are relatively marginal: young people, anarchists, migrants and
radical political activists. Although they are not many, they raise
their profile using public campaigns and media coverage, the report
says.
The "delegitimizers" cooperate with organizations engaging
in legitimate criticism of Israel's policy in the territories such as
Amnesty and Human Rights Watch, blurring the line between legitimate
censure and delegitimization. They also promote pro-Palestinian
activities in Europe as "trendy," the report says.
The network's
activists are not mostly Palestinian, Arab or Muslim. Many of them are
European and North American left-wing activists. The Western left has
changed its approach to Israel and now sees it as an occupation state,
the report says. To those left-wing groups, if in the 1960s Israel was
seen as a model for an egalitarian, socialist society, today it
epitomizes Western evil.
The delegitimization network sees the
fight against the former regime in South Africa as a success model. It
believes that like the apartheid regime, the Zionist-Israeli model can
be toppled and a one-state model can be established.
The Reut
team says the network's groups share symbols and heroes such as the
Palestinian boy Mohammed al-Dura, American peace activist Rachel Corrie
and joint events like the Durban Conference.
Israel's diplomats
overseas, meanwhile, must counter the attempts to delegitimize the
country. "The combination of a large Muslim community, a radical left,
influential, English-language media and an international university
center make London fertile ground for Israel's delegitimization," says
Ron Prosor, Israel's ambassador in London.
Prosor gives many
interviews to the British media and lectures at university campuses
throughout the country. Although he says he has encountered anti-Israel
demonstrations on almost every campus, Prosor has told his people to
increase their campus activity.
"What is now happening in London
universities will happen, at most, in five years at all the large
universities in the United States," he says.
The Reut report
says Israel is not prepared at all to deal with the threat of
delegitimization. The cabinet has not defined the issue as a threat and
sees the diplomatic arena as marginal compared to the military one.
"The
Foreign Ministry is built for the challenges of the '60s, not the
2000s," the report says. "There are no budgets, not enough diplomats
and no appropriate diplomatic doctrine."
Reut recommends setting
up a counter-network, in which Israel's embassies in centers of
delegitimization activity would serve as "front positions."
The
report says the intelligence service should monitor the organizations'
activities and study their methods. The cabinet should also confront
groups trying to delegitimize Israel but embrace those engaged in
legitimate criticism.
The report adds that Israel should not
boycott these groups, as Israel's embassy in Washington does with the
left-wing lobby J Street. Boycotting critics merely pushes them toward
joining the delegitimizers, Reut says.
Source ---------------------------------------------------------------
Mondoweiss by Alex Kane Student disruptions of Israeli officials continue to make wavesSee also
here 11-2-2010
The student protests at Oxford University and the University of California, Irvine that interrupted Israeli officialsâ speeches are continuing to make waves in a variety of ways. An apparent anti-Semitic
remark in Arabic was hurled at Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister
Danny Ayalon
during the interruptions to his speech. Various media outlets are
reporting that a protester yelled, âkill the Jewsâ at Ayalon, a former
Israeli ambassador to the United States and a member of the far-right
Yisrael Beiteinu party.
Ayalon is now considering pressing charges against the student who yelled at him. According to the
Independent (UK) ,
he said the move against the student demonstrated âour new policy on
hatred and racism. We will have zero tolerance for anti-Semitism,
something that should have happened a long time ago.â
The local police and the Oxford Union have launched investigations into the matter.
Of
course, what these media reports donât mention is the irony that as
Ayalon is denouncing âhatred and racism,â he is a member of a political
party whose leader,
Avigdor Lieberman , is on record saying numerous racist remarks against Palestinians. For instance, Lieberman called for the
execution of Arab members of the Knesset who met with Hamas, and ran a
campaign
centered around the slogan, âno citizenship without loyalty,â wanting
Palestinians living inside Israel to be forced to sign a âloyaltyâ oath
to the Jewish State. And Yisrael Beiteinu has introduced legislation
that would ban commemoration of the Nakba.
Then thereâs
J Street U , the student branch of
J Street ,
which released a statement seemingly painting the disruptions of
Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren and Ayalonâs speeches as anti-Semitic
and racist. The
statement reads, in part:
J
Street U is deeply concerned about recent incidents on college campuses
aimed at obstructing civil and open debate around the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We believe that universities
should be a place for an honest discussion about tough issues. While
appropriate and respectful protests are a legitimate and important part
of the conversation on campus, anti-Semitic, racist, disruptive and
inflammatory actions and language are simply unacceptable.
In particular, we were profoundly offended by the anti-Semitic rhetoric
used by a student to attack Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny
Ayalon during a recent talk at Oxford University. We were also deeply
disappointed to hear about attempts to interrupt Ambassador Michael
Orenâs remarks at the University of California, Irvine, with heckling
aimed at drowning out the Ambassadorâs speech. The
statement comes as Oren said that the rift between Oren and J Streetâ a
result of Orenâs refusal to attend a J Street conference last
Octoberâis healing. Oren
told
the Los Angeles Jewish Journal that, âJ Street has now come and
supported Congressman [Howard] Bermanâs Iran sanction bill; it has
condemned the Goldstone report; it has denounced the British courtâs
decision to try Tzipi Livni for war crimes, which puts J Street much
more into the mainstream.â
During Orenâs speech at the University of California, Irvine, 11 students were arrested for interrupting his speech. The
Muslim Public Affairs Council has demanded an investigation over the arrests in a letter to school officials, saying:
University police had every right to escort the individuals out of the
room, and bar them from re-entering. However, it is unclear what law
they broke that would allow for them to be arrested for their actions.
For this reason, we are calling on your office and that of the UCI
Police Department to conduct a thorough and transparent investigation
into the arrest of these students. Source---------------------------------------------------------------
Mondoweiss Oxford students: Our protest of Ayalon was a massive success by Philip Weiss 10-2-2010
The
official report of Oxford Universityâs Palestine Society on last
nightâs demonstrations against the speech by Israeli Deputy Foreign
Minister Danny Ayalon: Danny Ayalon, Israelâs Deputy
Foreign Minister and member of the far-right Yisrael Beitenu party,
came to the Oxford Union on 8 February, on a desperate PR mission to
resuscitate Israelâs image after global public condemnation for its war
crimes in Gaza last year. The Oxford Studentsâ Palestine Society,
together with other student groups and members of the public, organised
a protest, both on the street outside the Union and within the debating
chamber itself.
It is our belief that Yisrael Beitenu, Danny
Ayalonâs party, is a racist party which advocates apartheid policies.
Ayalon himself refuses to recognise the West Bank and Jerusalem as
Occupied Territory and is attempting to introduce legislation which
would criminalise Palestinians who celebrate their national day of
remembrance, Nakba Day. The fact that such a figure was invited to the
Oxford Union unopposed is a disgrace. As such, we, the Oxford Studentsâ
Palestine Society, felt it necessary to present our own challenge, and
demonstrate the continuing resistance to apartheid, to occupation, to
the crippling blockade on Gaza, to house demolitions and to settlement
building.
The protest was a massive success. Outside, over a
hundred people joined together to chant slogans in support of
Palestine, carrying banners condemning Israeli policy and waving the
Palestinian flag. Inside, numerous individual students interrupted the
talk, challenging Ayalonâs assertions that the West Bank and East
Jerusalem were not Occupied Territory, and that Israel had âgiven upâ a
third of its country in its peace deal with Egypt. Before long, Ayalon
was not able to continue his rehearsed speech, and was forced to
contend with a gathering storm of intelligent questions and statements
contradicting his evasions and outright lies. At one point a member of
the Palestine Society read out a full page of the Goldstone Report
dealing with Israelâs deliberate killing of civilians, to thunderous
applause from the audience. Another student raised a Palestinian flag
and called out a list of Israelâs war crimes, including the use of
chemical weapons during the war on Gaza in January 2009. Israelâs
ambassador to the UK, Ron Prosor, sitting in the front row, looked
bewildered and embarrassed by his colleagueâs feeble performance.
Beyond
the hosting of Ayalon, and his outrageous remarks, the real scandal of
the evening was the thuggery of Ayalonâs security staff. After the
talk, as one protestor photographed their car, the security staff drove
straight into him. This sort of violence is commonplace in the Occupied
Territories, but rarely exposed outside them, seeming particularly
surreal in Oxford. The protestor was carried on the car bonnet a
hundred yards down New Inn Hall Street, clinging on as the security
staff sped up. When he managed to fling himself clear, the protestor
was badly bruised, but luckily escaped serious injury. Two other Oxford
students had been forced to jump for cover as the car accelerated.
After the car swiftly disappeared, the three lodged an official
complaint. Thames Valley Police are now investigating the incident,
having been provided with photographic evidence.
Nevertheless,
despite the violence, the incident could not detract from the success
of the protest, nor distract from the clear message that students sent
to Ayalon and his state: until Israel ends its illegal occupation and
the Palestinians receive the justice they have been denied for the last
six decades, Israelâs representatives and propagandists will not be
welcome at Oxford University. This is the same message which British
students sent to President Shimon Peres in November 2008, and which
American students sent to former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in October
2009. It was sent again to Ambassador Michael Oren by students in
California, on the same day as our protest at Ayalonâs appearance in
Oxford. The call for justice continues.
Source ---------------------------------------------------------------
PACBI Boycott "Ariel" and the Rest! All Israeli Academic Institutions are Complicit in Occupation and Apartheid
10-2-2010
In
response to the recent decision by the Israeli government to upgrade
the status of the so-called Ariel University Center of Samaria (AUCS)
to a full university, the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and
Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) reiterates its call for a boycott of
AUCS and all other Israeli academic institutions due to their
complicity in maintaining Israelâs occupation, colonization and
apartheid against the Palestinian people. While PACBI welcomes
the recent protests against the decision to recognize AUCS--located in
the fourth largest Jewish colony in the occupied Palestinian
territoriesâ-as a university, it cautions against attempts to divert
the boycott movement away from its basis in the comprehensive,
UN-sanctioned rights embodied in the Palestinian call for boycotting
Israel to a selective focus on a subset of these rights.
Academics,
journalists and others on the Zionist "left" who have opposed the
academic boycott for years are now enthusiastically advocating a
boycott that solely targets Ariel College because it is illegally built
on occupied Palestinian territory. This, however, reduces the scope of
the academic boycott to one against settlement institutions, while
exonerating the Israeli academy at large, which is just as complicit,
if not more, than Ariel in maintaining and justifying the Israeli
colonial and apartheid apparatus. But even if the boycott were to apply
only to universities built on occupied Palestinian territory, why
hasnât the fact that the Hebrew Universityâs Mount Scopus campus sits
on occupied Palestinian land in East Jerusalem provoked any Ariel-like
condemnation?
All Israeli universities are deeply linked to the
military-security establishment, playing indispensable -- direct and
indirect -- roles in perpetuating Israelâs decades-old violations of
international law and fundamental Palestinian rights. No Israeli
university or academic union has ever taken a public position against
the occupation, let alone against Israelâs system of apartheid or the
denial of Palestinian refugee rights. Israeli universities are
profoundly complicit in developing weapon systems and military
doctrines deployed in Israelâs recent war crimes in Gaza [1];
justifying the ongoing colonization of Palestinian land and gradual
ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinians [2]; providing moral
justification for extra-judicial killings and indiscriminate attacks
against civilians [3]; systematically discriminating against
"non-Jewish" students in admissions, dormitory room eligibility,
financial aid, etc.; and many other implicit and explicit violations of
human rights and international law. [4]
As BDS gains momentum
globally, an increasing number of Israeli voices are emerging in
support of this strategy as the most effective, non-violent route to
bring about change towards justice and durable peace. The endorsement
by Israeli artists and academics of specific boycott actions in the
past few years is welcome and well known. After Israelâs war of
aggression on Gaza, several Israeli academic and cultural figures came
out in support of BDS. [5] Long before the Gaza massacre, though,
staunch Israeli supporters of Palestinian rights such as Rachel Giora,
Ilan Pappe, Haim Bresheeth, Oren Ben-Dor, Anat Matar and the late Tanya
Reinhart had embraced BDS and defended it against Israeli critics,
particularly so-called "leftists" in the academy. [6] The recently
formed group,
Boycott! Supporting the Palestinian BDS Call from Within
[7], is particularly praiseworthy, as it unconditionally accepts BDS as
defined and guided by the Palestinian BDS National Committee, and is
therefore regarded by the BNC as a reliable and principled partner in
the movement.
These emerging voices from inside Israeli society
point to the growing appeal of BDS and the recognition of its power to
effect real change towards just peace. It is nevertheless crucial to
emphasize that the BDS movement derives its principles from both the
demands of the Palestinian BDS Call, signed by over 170 Palestinian
civil society organizations in July 2005, [8] and, in the academic and
cultural fields, from the Palestinian Call for Academic and Cultural
Boycott of Israel, issued a year earlier in July 2004. [9] Together,
the BDS and PACBI Calls represent the most authoritative and widely
supported strategic statements to have emerged from Palestine in
decades; all political factions, labour, student and women
organizations, and refugee groups across the Arab world have supported
and endorsed these calls. Both calls underline the prevailing
Palestinian belief that the most effective form of solidarity with the
Palestinian people is direct action aimed at bringing an end to
Israelâs colonial and apartheid regime, just as the apartheid regime in
South Africa was abolished, by isolating Israel internationally through
boycotts and sanctions, forcing it to comply with international law and
respect Palestinian rights.
Since the formulation of these
calls, a great deal of emphasis has been placed on defining the
principles of the boycott movement. Rooted in universal values and
principles, the BDS Call categorically rejects all forms of racism,
racial discrimination and colonial oppression. PACBI has also
translated the principles enshrined in its Call into practical
guidelines for implementing the international academic and cultural
boycott of Israel. [10] All the while, the Palestinian boycott movement
has been clear as to what the focus and goals of the BDS movement are.
In
this respect, the importance of the 2005 BDS Call lies in its
comprehensive approach to the Israeli colonial and apartheid system as
a whole, and its subjugation of the Palestinian people, whether as
second-class citizens inside Israel, subjects under its military
occupation, or dispossessed refugees. This was summarized in the
concise demands outlined in the Palestinian BDS call that Israel
recognize the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self
determination and fully comply with international law by: respecting,
protecting and promoting the right of return of all Palestinian
refugees; ending the occupation of all Palestinian and Arab lands; and
recognizing full equality for the Palestinian citizens of Israel. In
this sense, the BDS Call effectively counters the systematic Israeli
fragmentation of the Palestinian people and the reduction of the
struggle for freedom and self-determination to an endless bargaining
game over land in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Central
to the Palestinian BDS movementâs three demands is an understanding of
Israel as an apartheid state. Israel fits the UN definition of
apartheid not just in the West Bank and Gaza Strip; it defines itself
as a Jewish state, not a state of all its citizens. Most importantly,
Israeli laws, policies, and practices discriminate openly against
Palestinian--i.e., "non-Jewish"-- citizens of the state. The pervasive
and institutionalized racism and discrimination are particularly
evident in the vital domains of land ownership and use, education,
employment, access to public services, and urban planning. The
apartheid character has been part of the design of Israel since its
inception. [11]
The state of Israel was established in 1948 by
forcibly displacing the overwhelming majority of Palestineâs indigenous
Arab population from their homeland. Today, these Palestinian refugees
are prevented from returning to their homes and lands from which they
were expelled. In contrast, any person who claims Jewish descent from
anywhere in the world may become an Israeli citizen and national under
the so-called Law of Return. Moreover, Israelâs brutal war on Gaza was
not an anomaly; rather, it represents the most recent example of the
systematic policies of ethnic cleansing and colonial oppression that
Israel has carried out against the Palestinian people for more than six
decades. During this recent military onslaught, Israel killed over
1,440 Palestinians, of whom 431 were children, and injured another
5380. [12] Israel subjected the besieged population of Gaza to three
weeks of unrelenting state terror.
Despite the clarity with
which the Palestinian BDS movement has enunciated the goals of the
Palestinian struggle, some Israeli and other advocates of boycott have
tried to limit its scope. They have attempted to limit the goals of
the BDS movement by restricting it geo-politically and confining it to
a call to end the Israeli occupation over the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
This "interpretation" of BDS is most dangerous as it attempts to
appropriate the right to redefine the terms of the struggle in
Palestine and to impose an ideologically suspect political agenda that
lets Israel off the hook on the charges of apartheid and practicing the
most pernicious form of racism and discrimination in all the territory
under its control.
Some Israelis also base their support for BDS
on a purely utilitarian rationale, that of âsaving Israel from itself,â
rather than principled solidarity with the Palestinians. This
Israel-centered, âpragmaticâ perspective, however, reproduces a
colonial attitude of superiority where the indigenous population and
their inalienable rights and struggle for freedom are not even
recognized. What matter, according to this perspective, are Israelâs
own self-interest, international image, and future. Yet if some are
committed to preserving Israelâs character into the future without
challenging its colonial and apartheid laws and policies, how can they
be counted on as true allies in the Palestinian-led, global BDS
movement?
As for the targets chosen for BDS actions, the
strength of the BDS movement lies in the fact that it does not impose
specific targets or tactics on solidarity groups around the world.
Based on the principle of context-sensitivity and respect for the
autonomy and integrity of democratic international groups supporting
Palestinian rights, the Palestinian BDS collective leadership has
always believed that people of conscience and organizations advocating
human rights know their respective situation best and are the most
capable of deciding the appropriate ways and pace to build the BDS
movement in their contexts. Sometimes the tactical targeting of
settlement-only products may be the best way for a campaign to
progress. At other times, it may be resolutions at local unions
endorsing BDS, or cultural boycott targets, etc. But even if one were
concerned only about Israelâs occupation, not its denial of refugee
rights or its apartheid system, this cannot justify a principled focus
on boycotting âsettlement productsâ only, as if Israelâs colonies
themselves were the party guilty of colonialism, not the state that
established them and sustains their growth. In no other boycott context
in the world does anyone call for boycotting a manifestation of a
stateâs violations of international law, rather than the state itself.
After all, under international law states are the legal entities that
are supposed to be held accountable for crimes and violations that they
commit.
Regardless, it is never up to Israeli academics or
activists, no matter what their principles are, to set out the
reference parameters and priorities of the movement, particularly for
activists worldwide. More often than not, members of the Zionist left
have refused to recognize the BDS Call issued by the overwhelming
majority of Palestinian civil society organizations, and its anchor and
leadership, the Palestinian BDS National Committee, BNC. [13] In so
doing they fail to respect the aspirations of the Palestinian people
and our right to define the goals of our struggle. Moreover, in
response to the Zionist leftâs insistence on focusing on the symptoms
of the Israeli system of colonial oppression, by calling only for an
end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, it is
worth emphasizing that in apartheid South Africa it would have been
ludicrous to focus solely on the Bantustans. The struggle against the
Bantustans was an intrinsic part of the struggle to end the apartheid
system as a structure of dominance whereby the white minority
subjugated and oppressed the Black South African population.
As
a people living under Israeli apartheid and exiled from their land, it
is up to the Palestinians and their mass organizations to set their
priorities, objectives and strategies to attain our rights under
international law. Israeli support is a welcome and necessary part of
this movement. But it must be extended in the spirit of real
solidarity, as in the case of Boycott From Within, respecting the
wishes and aspirations of the Palestinian people themselves.
[1]
See, for example, the following incriminating evidence against Tel Aviv
Universityâs partnership with the Israeli army and weapons industries:
http://www.electronicintifada.net/downloads/pdf/090708-soas-palestine-society.pdf [2]
http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=63 [3]
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1062127.html and Reuven Pedatzur, The Israeli Army House Philosopher, Haaretz, 24 February 2004.
[4]
http://www.alternativenews.org/images/stories/downloads/Economy_of_the_occupation_23-24.pdf [5] See, for example, Neve Gordonâs BDS article at:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-gordon20-2009aug20,0,1126906.story and Udi Aloniâs at:
http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=37582 [6] See, for example, Tanya Reinhartâs letter to Israeli academic Baruch Kimmerling at:
http://www.mediamonitors.net/tanya13.html [7] http://
www.boycottisrael.info [8]
http://bdsmovement.net/?q=node/52 [9]
http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=869 [10]
http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=1047 and
http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=1107 [11] For more on Israelâs regime of occupation, colonization and apartheid see this important BNC strategic position paper:
http://bdsmovement.net/files/English-BNC_Position_Paper-Durban_Review.pdf [12]
http://www.ochaopt.org/gazacrisis/index.php?section=3 [13] For example Uri Avneryâs sweeping dismissal of the Palestinian BDS Call and the Palestinian BDS National Committee:
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1252168050 Source ---------------------------------------------------------------
Ha'aretz British academics urge Elton John to cancel Israel concert Elton John (AP) 9-2-2010
A group of British academics have called on singer Elton John to cancel his scheduled performance in Israel this June.
"Political
or not political, when you stand up on that stage in Tel Aviv, you line
yourself up with a racist state," the British Committee for
Universities of Palestine wrote in an open letter to John on Monday.
"Do you want to give them the satisfaction? Please don't go." In
the letter, the group urged John to read the Goldstone Commission's
report on Israel's conduct during the war in Gaza last year in order to
understand why his performance carried an inherently political
undertone.
"You may say you're not a political person, but does
an army dropping white phosphorus on a school building full of children
demand a political response? Does walling a million and a half people
up in a ghetto and then pounding that ghetto to rubble require a
political response from us, or a human one?
"You're behaving as
if playing in Israel is morally neutral - but how can it be? How can
the cruelties Israel practices against the Palestinians - fundamentally
because the Palestinians are there, on Palestinian land, and Israel
wants them to go - be morally neutral?"
"Okay, you turn up in
Ramat Gan, and it gets to that 'Candle in the Wind? moment, and
thousands of lighters flicker - but there won't be any Palestinians
from the Occupied Territories swaying along with the Israelis - the
army won't let them leave their ghettoes.
"Please read what
Judge Goldstone said about the onslaught on Gaza; what Amnesty
International and Human Rights Watch have been saying for decades about
the crimes committed against the Palestinians. Of course the Israeli
state denies it has a case to answer, though it's knee-deep in ethnic
cleansing and land-theft and the endless daily suffocating of
Palestinian lives and hopes."
Israel boycotters succeeded just
weeks ago in convincing Santana to cancel his own performance. Similar
attempts to get Leonard Cohen and Paul McCartney to stay away, however,
failed
Source ---------------------------------------------------------------
Ha'aretz What is the reason to start the header of this article with " Muslim students" Were this only Muslims ? How do you know that? Or is it just spinning and polarisation? You can see it yourself below on the Video found on the internet Note the difference in reporting by al Jazeera just below this article (H.) . Raucous protesters disrupt Israeli ambassador speech at UCI Twelve
people were arrested during a lecture at UC Irvine where Israeli
Ambassador Michael Oren came to talk about U.S.-Israel relations. Video
by Eugene Garcia, ocregister.com More video's here Source --------------------------------------------------------------- Israel's Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren. (Kobi Gideon) (Muslim ? ) students scream 'killer' during Israel envoy speech in L.A. By Natasha Mozgovaya Police arrest 12 hecklers who disrupted Michael Oren's speech at California university. 9-2-2010 California
police reportedly made 12 arrests on Monday after a speech by Israel's
U.S. Ambassador Michael Oren descended into chaos. Hecklers
interrupted Oren's lecture at University of California, Irvine, over 10
times, shouting "killers" and "how many Palestinians did you kill?" Oren
took a 20 minute break after the fourth protest, only to be interrupted
again by young men yelling at him every few minutes, local press
reported. Many members of the audience also applauded Oren. The arrested students were apparently ( ?- H.) members of the university's Muslim Student Union, which had publicly condemned Oren's visit earlier in the day. In a statement printed by the Orange County Register, a newspaper, the union said: "We condemn and oppose the presence of Michael Oren, the ambassador of Israel to the United States, on our campus today. "We
resent that the Law School and the Political Science Department on our
campus have agreed to cosponsor a public figure who represents a state
that continues to break international and humanitarian law and is
condemned by more UN Human Rights Council resolutions than all other
countries in the world combined." Oren eventually completed his speech, some time later than scheduled, but did not take questions from the audience as planned. University
Chancellor Michael Drake was booed by some and applauded by others when
he told the audience that he was embarrassed by the outburst.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------al Jazeera Israeli diplomats 'hazed' on campus By Clayton Swisher 11-2-2010Pro-Palestinian
university students appear to be growing more vocal and organized with
their frustrations. And it's a phenomena that seems to have caught the
Israelis off guard. The Israelis have a lot of experience
dealing with asymmetrical warfare. But they're not exactly used to its
latest manifestation, which could be coming to a college campus near
you. Committed activists let their frustrations be heard on Monday in two separate lectures delivered by senior Israeli diplomats. While the videos go viral among students, its watching the tactics used at these events that must be leaving Israel unnerved. Consider
the way in which a mockery was made of Israel's Ambassador to the U.S.
Michael Oren, who presented at the University of California at Irvine. The New York-born former academic
had nary a minute to get into his talking points when he himself was
taken to school by angry students, at least one of whom shouted
"propagating murder is not an expression of free speech!" The heckling made it impossible for Oren to carry on, and persisted in spite of pleas and threats by audience members and promises of arrest by the rattled college rector. Most of the Oren's detractors made reference to Israel's actions during the 2009 Gaza War. Israel is under heavy strain by UN officials
and international rights organizations to be held accountable for
crimes of war during the 17-day Israeli assault on Gaza. Some from
academia have defended Israel from the charges, including Harvard's Alan Dershowitz , who went so far as to attack UN Investigator Richard Goldstone with a provocative Hebrew word that translates as "traitor to the Jewish people".Off guard? But
by in large, what is making me take notice is how pro-Palestinian
students seem to be growing more vocal and organized with their
frustrations. It's a phenomena that seems to have caught the
Israelis off guard. When Oren's appeal for Middle East-like
hospitality failed, Oren jousted: "This is not London or Tehran!" He must have been clairvoyant. Across the Pond at Oxford Union on that same day, it was not exactly going swimmingly for Deputy Foreign Minister Dann Ayalon , trying also to lay down a rote defense of Israel. Students there also used timed interruptions, and apparently racist invectives, to upset their Israeli guest. Unlike Saudi Arabia's Prince Turki , these students were more interested in shaking fists at Ayalon than afterwards shaking hands. The implications of this week's Israeli diplo-heckling are uncertain. Aside from threatened legal action by Ayalon ,
stiffer heckling penalties will likely be imposed, but can only go so
far. These guys are professional and, in Ayalon's case, should know
from experience how to handle themselves . Much
as some might hope, campus gumshoes are unlikely to bar students from
attending based on their affiliations, religion, or appearance, lest
they abandon the pluralistic values which underpin most institutions
and set themselves up for lawsuits. Instead organizers will
have to find other ways to keep this youthful equalizer at bay, which
will probably mean skipping universities with large pro-Palestinian
activist bodies. And that seems to be a widening community. NOTE:
Middle East passions also reached my Alma Mater last month where the
same exact tactics were used to frustrate a presentation by U.S.
CENTCOM Commander General David Petraeus. Last October, Ehud Olmert, the former Israeli prime minister, also faced a tough crowd despite steps taken by the university.Source --------------------------------------------------------------- End the Occupation Boycott and divestment gets mainstream attention in church, on campus 4-2-2010It's
good news to see that boycott and divestment campaigns against
companies profiting from Israeli occupation and apartheid are becoming
increasingly mainstream. Here's a couple of recent examples. The National Catholic Reporter ran a great article about the Kairos Document produced by the Palestinian Christian community ,
calling for churches around the world to intervene for justice and
peace in Israel/Palestine via boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS)
campaigns: "The leaders of the
thirteen Christian communities serving in the Palestinian territories
-- including Latin and Orthodox patriarchs -- have declared the Israeli
occupation of the Palestinian Territories a âsin against God and
humanityâ and urged Christians everywhere to nonviolently intervene to
end its injustices....Such a response, the authors wrote, includes
civil disobedience, boycotts, and divestment campaigns. âResistance is
a right and duty for Christians. But it is resistance with love as its
logic,â they said....The national committee for the Palestinian Boycott and Divestment and Sanctions campaign
said it âsaluted the moral clarity, courage, and principled position
conveyed in this new document which emphasizes that resisting injustice
should âconcern the church.â " The article quotes US Campaign National Media Coordinator David Hosey in regards to U.S. church involvement with divestment campaigns:
"David Hosey, media coordinator for the U.S. Campaign to End the
Israeli Occupation and a missionary with the United Methodist Church,
said members of the New England conference of that church are in
correspondence with the targeted companies, the first step in âphased
divestment.â The Methodists adopted a resolution in 2004 opposing the
Israeli occupation of Palestinian Territories. Various regional
conferences are now debating whether or not to express that opposition
with divestment campaigns.... As for action from the Roman
Catholic Church, Hosey said members of the Sisters of Loretto, a U.S.
order of Catholic women religious, were pushing for shareholder
resolutions urging Caterpillar to stop its sale of militarized
bulldozers to Israel. Christian calls for divestment have
sparked criticism from various Jewish organizations and, at times,
strained inter-religious dialogue. But Hosey thinks that could change
as more Jewish and Israeli groups endorse using economic pressure to
change Israeli action in the Occupied Territories." Divestment is becoming part of the mainstream discourse on U.S. campuses as well. The University of Arizona Daily Wildcat now includes a weekly column on corporate involvement in the Israeli occupation. This week's column
notes the connections between corporate accountability work against
sweat shops, the BDS campaign against South African apartheid, and the
BDS movement against Israeli occupation, as well as highlighting the
University's investments in human rights abusers Caterpillar and
Motorola: "After an intensive
anti-sweatshop campaign last spring led by students in the
Sweatshop-Free Coalition and University Community for Human Rights,
President Robert Shelton had the UA divest our financial holdings in
the Russell Corporation due to the companyâs singularly cruel labor
abuses in its factories in Honduras. Now, while all eyes are on Shelton
as he continues to sit on the UAâs illegal business contracts with
Caterpillar and Motorola, itâs worth noting that divestment activism on
campus stretches back far beyond Sheltonâs tenure and probably beyond
everything else on campus except for the oldest of UAâs
buildings........Motorola and Caterpillar, two companies perpetuating
grisly crimes upon mostly Palestinian civilians in the occupied West
Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, are so unspeakable as to have prompted
Jewish South African politician Ronnie Kasrils, who was quoted in the
United Kingdomâs Guardian in a 2006 article, to denounce the
U.S.-backed Israeli occupation as âmuch worse than apartheidâ of the
sort under which Kasrils and others survived for so many long, bloody
years. A rich history has proven that UA students have risen to the
occasion of doing everything they can to disassociate themselves and
their universities from such atrocities. One doesnât have to look far
to see that such a time has come again." Check out the US Campaign's website for resources on starting your own boycott and divestment campaign on campus and/or organizing against Caterpillar and Motorola in your community. Source ---------------------------------------------------------------the Heathlander Donât mean no trouble⌠From the now legendary Cambridge Tab : 2-2-2010âThe
Cambridge University Israel Society have cancelled a talk by former
Cambridge student Benny Morris after pressure from students. The political historian, who was due to speak at Catz, has been accused in the press of âIslamophobiaâ. The
decision to cancel the talk was made by Israel Society after a letter
was sent to CUSU signed by over a dozen University employees and
students, including committee members of the CU Islamic Society, and
English Faculty staff. [...] Kingâs student, Jamie Stern-Weiner led a campaign on Facebook
to have the talk cancelled. The group, which today had 40 members,
described the invitation extended to Morris as âoffensive and
appallingâ and questioned why âan official student society would want
to invite such an individualâ. Stern-Weiner said âThis is not a
political issue, itâs about making a clear stand against hateful
opinions and the impact they have on the atmosphere on campus.ââ Muahahaha!Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Electronic Intifada Carleton University students launch campus divestment campaign Statement, Students Against Israeli Apartheid - Carleton 1-2-2010For
the past several months, Students Against Israeli Apartheid - Carleton
(SAIA), a student group at Carleton University in Ottawa that is
committed to supporting the Palestinian struggle for freedom, has been
conducting research on Carleton's investments in Israeli apartheid. The
Carleton Pension Fund currently lacks any ethical guidelines, with its
only mandate being the maximization of profit. SAIA has discovered that
the Pension Fund, which provides retirement income for Carleton staff
and faculty, currently has some $2,762,535 invested in five companies
that are complicit in the oppression of the Palestinian people. In
light of these findings, SAIA has launched a campaign calling on
Carleton to immediately divest from the offending corporations:
Motorola, BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman, L-3 Communications and Tesco
supermarkets, as well as to adopt a socially responsible investment
policy for all of its investments. Motorola is involved in
designing and implementing perimeter surveillance systems around
illegal Israeli settlements and military camps in the West Bank.
Motorola and its subsidiaries also have hundreds of millions of dollars
worth of contracts to supply the Israeli military with
telecommunications technology, checkpoint security and control systems.
By providing support for the Israeli military, Motorola plays a role in
ensuring that settlement expansion will continue, and that the
occupation will deepen, in a clear violation of international law. BAE
Systems is the world's third-largest arms producer. Both BAE and its
Israeli subsidiary, Rokar, contribute to weaponry used by Israel to
attack Palestinian civilians in the occupied West Bank and Gaza. BAE
produces cluster bombs and the F-16 combat aircraft, which were used
during the 2008-2009 assault on the Gaza Strip, which killed over 1,400
Palestinians, most of whom were non-combatant civilians. Northrop
Grumman, one of the world's largest weapons manufacturers, provided the
Israeli military with many of the parts for the Apache AH64D Longbow
Helicopter, which was described by Amnesty International as a piece of
"key equipment used by the [Israeli military] in the [December 2008 -
January 2009] Gaza bombing campaign." Furthermore, Northrop Grumman is
the sole provider of radars for the F-16 combat aircraft. It also
assists in producing the Longbow Hellfire 2 missiles, which, as has
been documented by many human rights organizations, were widely used
against Palestinian civilians in Gaza. L-3 Communications is one
of the many large multinational firms aiding in the construction and
maintenance of the system of military checkpoints that severely
restrict Palestinian freedom of movement in the West Bank and around
Gaza. The matrix of checkpoints has been condemned by human rights
organizations as a brutally repressive system that violates the basic
human rights of the Palestinian people. In addition to being a means of
political repression and land annexation, the checkpoints constitute a
tool of collective punishment, which is a crime under international law. Tesco
Supermarkets is a large United Kingdom-based international grocery and
general merchandising retail chain. It has been the target of social
justice activists in the UK for selling produce originating from
illegal Israeli settlements, for mislabeling products coming from the
settlements as "West Bank," as well as for using an exporter,
Carmel-Agrexco, which has been criticized for using slavery-type
working conditions in its factories in the occupied West Bank. Tesco's
financial support for the illegal Israeli settlements lends them
legitimacy and enables their economic growth and physical expansion,
while simultaneously inhibiting the development of the Palestinian
economy. Carleton is no stranger to boycott, divestment and
sanctions (BDS) activism, and it has a strong precedent to build upon.
In 1987, Carleton divested from all companies complicit in the
apartheid regime in South Africa. Carleton's president at the time
wrote a memorandum, saying, "Carleton University abhors apartheid and
will do all it can to show its position on apartheid within its
business practices." Given Carleton's past commitment to divesting from
apartheid regimes, SAIA is calling on the university to once again
place itself on the right side of history by ending its investments in
the ongoing oppression of the Palestinian people. The South
African victory serves as an inspiring model for SAIA's divestment
campaign, which is the first Palestine-centered divestment initiative
in Canada. Hopes are high that, through a well-planned local campaign,
as well as the natural growth of BDS, momentum will pick up at
universities across the country and similar initiatives will emerge to
form a national movement to cut campus ties with Israeli apartheid. Specifically, SAIA recommends that: 1.
The Carleton University Board of Governors, via the Pension Fund
Committee, immediately divest of its stock in BAE Systems, L-3
Communications, Motorola, Northrop Grumman and Tesco 2. Carleton
University refrain from investing in other companies involved in
violations of international law (for recommended guidelines see
Conclusions/Recommendations section of the divestment report) 3.
Carleton University work with the entire university community to
develop, adopt and implement a broader policy of Socially Responsible
Investment (SRI) for its Pension Fund and other investments, through a
transparent and effective process. Download the full report :
Carleton University Pension Fund: Complicity in Violations of Human
Rights and International Law in the Occupied Palestinian Territories
[PDF]Source ---------------------------------------------------------------SAIA Carleton launches pension divestment campaign > > > ".
. . the global movement for boycott, divestment and sanctions, BDS,
against Israel presents not only a progressive, anti-racist,
sophisticated, sustainable, moral and effective form of civil,
non-violent resistance, but a real chance of becoming the political
catalyst and moral anchor for a strengthened, reinvigorated
international social movement capable of reaffirming the rights of all
humans to freedom, equality and dignity and the right of nations to
self-determination." --- Omar Barghouti "
More video's here Click here for campaign resources & how to get involved
"It reminded me so much of what happened to us black people in South Africa. I have seen the humiliation of the Palestinians at checkpoints and roadblocks, suffering like us when young white police officers prevented us from moving about. Many South Africans are beginning to recognize the parallels to what we went through." --- Desmond Tutu More video's here REPRESSION BY CARLETON ADMINISTRATION * Report by CBC Radio One's All In A Day (18 February 2009) [Local MP3 ] * Visit our Campus Repression page for additional information.
* SAIA has been inundated with letters of support, criticizing the
administration's attempts at repressing students' rights to free
expression. o The first batch of letters is available here . UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA JOINS CARLETON IN BANNING IAW POSTER * In yet another act of repression by the Allan Rock administration, the University of Ottawa has joined Carleton's high administration in banning Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) use of the official Israeli Apartheid Week 2009 poster. * Report by CBC News . Source ---------------------------------------------------------------
Gaza stranded students losing hope Yousef al-Helou, Press TV, Gaza
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:01:59 GMT
---------------------------------------------------------------the National West Bank college boosts settlementsBy Jonathan Cook 25-1-2010NAZARETH,
ISRAEL // Ehud Barak, Israelâs defence minister, approved last week the
upgrading to university status of a college in a settlement located
deep inside the West Bank, a move certain to further undermine
Palestinian confidence in the peace process. The decision,
authorising the first Israeli university in Palestinian territory, is
expected to entitle the college to significant extra funding, allowing
it to expand its student population. About 11,000 students,
most from inside Israel, already attend the college in Ariel, studying
amid a population of 18,000 settlers. The expansion of Ariel,
20km inside the West Bank and close to Nablus, is likely to increase
tensions with the US administration of Barack Obama. The White House
has demanded a settlement freeze that is being only temporarily and
partially honoured by Israel. The United States and Israel
have repeatedly clashed over Israeli plans to extend its separation
wall east of Ariel, effectively annexing the settlement and separating
the central and northern parts of the West Bank. Peace groups
have been particularly shocked that authorisation for Ariel collegeâs
upgrade came from Mr Barak, leader of the Labor Party. Members of his
centre-left faction had previously blocked attempts by right-wing
parties to change the collegeâs status. Several Israeli
academics also warned that it would add fuel to existing campaigns in
Europe to boycott Israeli universities, which have been accused of
complicity with the occupation. âThis is all about trying to
make the settlement of Ariel âkosherâ,â said Yariv Oppenheimer, head of
the Peace Now, an Israeli group that monitors settlement growth. âIt
helps to reinforce the growing consensus in Israel that Ariel should
remain part of Israel permanently.â Ariel College has grown
dramatically since its founding in 1982 as the West Bank campus of Bar
Ilan University in Ramat Gan, close to Tel Aviv. On becoming
independent in 2004, the college immediately began lobbying for
university status. A year later it won the backing of Ariel Sharon, the
prime minister then, who described the upgrade as of âgreat importanceâ
in realising a policy of âstrengthening the settlementsâ. Benjamin
Netanyahu, the current prime minister, declared at the time that a
university in Ariel would ensure the settlement âwill forever remain
part of the state of Israelâ. The upgrade was opposed by
Israelâs education oversight body, the Higher Education Council, which
threatened to withhold recognition of the collegeâs degrees. Nonetheless,
in 2007 the college renamed itself the âAriel University Centreâ, a
change of status initially endorsed by the government of Ehud Olmert.
Under pressure from education officials, however, the decision was
reversed on the grounds that only Israeli military authorities in the
West Bank â under Mr Barak â could authorise such a change. Despite opposition from members of his party, the defence minister finally consented last week. Yossi
Sarid, a former chairman of the Higher Education Council, wrote in the
Haaretz newspaper on Thursday: âThanks to [Mr Barak], we will have the
only university in the free world whose founders and owners are
uniformed officers.â Mr Barakâs approval suggested the growing
power of the far right in Mr Netanyahuâs government, said Anat Matar, a
philosophy professor at Tel Aviv Universty. Two weeks ago,
Avigdor Lieberman, the foreign minister and leader of the Yisrael
Beiteinu Party, threatened to block all legislative proposals from
Labor unless Ariel Collegeâs upgrade was approved. Yisrael
Beiteinu has made the settlementâs expansion a key plank in its
platform because Ariel has a large proportion of immigrants from the
former Soviet Union, Mr Liebermanâs core constituency. Alex
Miller, an Ariel resident and Yisrael Beiteinu politician, issued a
statement last week welcoming the decision as an âimportant shot of
encouragement for the settlementsâ. Ron Nachman, the mayor of
Ariel, has said he intends to turn the settlement into Israelâs version
of Princeton, a US town that has flourished on the back of its Ivy
League university. Mr Barakâs officials said the new status of
âuniversity centreâ would be a transitional measure before Ariel
College became Israelâs eighth fully fledged university, probably
within two years. Ariel College plans to double its intake of
students over the next decade, triple the size of its campus and build
a new neighbourhood for staff. About 70 per cent of the collegeâs
students are drawn from the Tel Aviv area inside Israel, as well as a
small number of Israeli Arab students. The college displays an
Israeli flag in every classroom and requires all students to take at
least one course on Judaism or Jewish heritage, usually overseen by
settler rabbis. Ariel, the fourth-largest settlement in the
West Bank, is considered by most Israelis as one of the âsettlement
blocsâ that will be annexed to Israel in a peace deal. Palestinians say
such an annexation would effectively cut the West Bank in two. There
are widespread fears among Israeli academics that calls for a boycott
of Israeli universities will intensify following the Ariel College
decision. Yaron Ezrahi, a professor at Hebrew University, called the
decision the âacademisation of the occupationâ. Amal Jamal,
the head of political science at Tel Aviv University, said the upgrade
would also highlight the extent to which universities inside Israel
colluded with the West Bank college. âThere is strong support for the
college among some academics at Israeli universities, which co-operate
with it in holding conferences, conducting research, supervising
doctoral students and teaching,â he said. A vote by the
British lecturersâ union in 2005, in favour of a limited academic
boycott of Israel, targeted Bar Ilan University because of its links to
Ariel College. Similar boycott motions have been passed annually by the
union, though later overturned. Last November, a Norwegian
university, Trondheim, became the first to vote on boycotting Israeli
universities, though the motion was rejected. Ariel College
found itself at the centre of a diplomatic row last year when Spain
disqualified its researchers from the finals of a competition to design
a solar-powered house. Spanish officials said the institution could not
participate because it was built on occupied Palestinian land.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------YNet NORWAY: Twelve points!!! Norway university plans Israel boycott Yaheli Moran Zelikovich Rector at University of Bergen says he supports boycott; some lecturers complain to Israeli embassy. 24-1-2010University
of Bergen, among Norway's largest academic institutions, intends to
impose an official academic boycott against Israel over what it claims
is its apartheid-like conduct, Ynet has learned. The
university's management has not yet officially responded to the move or
presented its stance on the issue. However, the institution's Rector,
Signumd Gronmo, enthusiastically supports the boycott calls. In
a debate held last week regarding the question of academic boycotts,
the rector boasted that his university does not maintain any ties with
Israeli academia and told attendants he wishes to enlist the support of
lecturers at the university to realize the boycott call. The
rector said that the move has encountered difficulties because of a
"handful of objectors" who aim to torpedo the move. However, lecturers
at the university who oppose the boycott handed over a complaint
regarding the rector's words to Israel's embassy over the weekend. University of Bergen boasts roughly 14,500 students and employsabout 3,200 staff members.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------ISM Bradford Palestine Solidarity Group hosts Palestine Awareness Week Bradford Palestine Solidarity Group
21-1-2010As
Palestinians continue to suffer in occupied Palestine, actions and
events are being held in the UK and Europe. The University of Bradford
Union (UBU), Palestine Return Centre and Let Palestinians Study are
organizing Palestine Awareness Week (PAW) and remembrance in Bradford
city. The week of actions coincides with the 1st Anniversary of Gaza
War which has been commemorated worldwide. Events will run from 1st
February to 5th February. Palestine Awareness Week starts
Monday 1st February with a live graffiti about Palestine. At 5pm there
will be a film screening of Occupation 101 open to students and members of public. The
second day will be a day of cultural festivities where Palestinian
food, traditional items, and free literature will be provided for
people to take away. There will also be presentations of Palestinian
cultural history and if possible a performance during lunch. A number
of information stalls will be available featuring Interpal, PRC, PSC,
United 4 Palestine, Viva Palestina Bradford, Friends of Al-Aqsa, FOSIS
â Palestine, Ceasefire, NUS Black Students Campaign, CND, Amnesty
International, UBU Peace Society and My Deen Today. In the
evening, we will be setting up a video link with Gaza and Viva
Palestina members to talk about their experience while visiting Gaza.
They are expected to provide a detailed description of the disastrous
humanitarian conditions there. On Wednesday, the event will
start with a video link with IUG students from Gaza to celebrate and
announce the twinning with Bradford University. This will be followed
by speakers including Professor Paul Rogers and Dr. Mandy Turner from
the Bradford Peace Studies department, Anas Altikriti, and other
speakers. Their talks will be broken into different topics focusing on
the history of the conflict and how it is affecting Palestinians lives
and communities. It will end with a question and answer session. In
the evening of Thursday 4th February, an speak-out will be held where
participants will be able to share poems and songs about Palestine. On the last day of PAW we will be hosting a Friday prayer at the University Great hall followed by a fundraiser for Palestine.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------YNet Left warns of global boycott over Ariel U (niversity Center. H. ). 20-1-2010Leftist
members of Knesset and Arab parties protest defense minister's decision
first published in Ynet to recognize Ariel College as university.
Meretz chairman: Hard to find differences between Barak and Netanyahu.
Initiative also advocates establishing university in Nazareth While Yisrael Beiteinu praised the defense minister's decision to recognize Ariel College as a university , Ehud Barak's decision is sharply criticized among the Left. Meretz Chairman Chaim Oron said that the move is wrought with conceptual and moral bankruptcy. Ynet
first published Wednesday that Barak authorized implementation of the
decision that stood amidst political clashes within the coalition. At
first, the college will be officially recognized as a "university
center" as it calls itself currently. In a few years, another
discussion will be held about turning the Ariel campus into the eighth
university in Israel. Member of Knesset Chaim Oron launched a
scathing attack against the defense minister: "Even those of sharp
eyesight and fine-tuned capabilities of distinction have for some time
had difficulty locating the conceptual differences, even in the
smallest nuances, between Barak and Netanyahu. Barak's decision will
only accelerate the trends toward isolating Israel from the academic
world in the international community." The decision also drew criticism from the Arab parties in the Knesset. MK Ahmad Tibi (United Arab List-Ta'al )
said, "Barak continues to permit the infestation of settlements and
surrender to Lieberman and Yisrael Beiteinu. Barak's decision will only spur the academic boycott of Israel in the world. (bold H.) The Labor Party proves once again that that it is a barrier to reconciliation between the two nations." MK Hanna Swaid (Hadash )
added: "This is a purely political decision that amounts to supporting
the settlements under the guise of higher education. It is best for the
government, if it wishes to support higher education, to support
existing universities and to decide on starting a university in
Nazareth." Peace Now also criticized Barak's decision: "The
Labor Party has again betrayed its principles and is perpetuating with
its own hands the occupation and expansion of the settlements. In a
place where there is no democracy, such as the West Bank, there is no
place for an academic education founded on the values of justice and
equality." On the other hand, Yisrael Beiteinu praised Barak's
move and emphasized that "this was done in accordance with the
coalition agreement." MK Alex Miller, who serves as chairman of
the Student Union in the Knesset and lives in Ariel, praised the
decision which, according to him, will strengthen Jewish settlement of
the West Bank. "The government gave an important shot of encouragement
today to the Jewish settlement in Samaria and to academia in Israel." Amnon Meranda, Yaheli Moran Zelikovich, Sharon Roffe-Ofir, and Efrat Weiss contributed to this report Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Abu Pessoptimist First illegal university in the world officially acknowledged Eerste illegale universiteit ter wereld wordt officieel erkend
Het Ariel University Center of Samaria . 20-1-2010De
IsraĂŤlische minister van Defensie Ehud Barak heeft toegezegd dat hij
een beslissing zal erkennen waarbij het College in de nederzetting
AriĂŤl officieel universiteit wordt. De beslissing om het
college op te waarderen werd al in 2005 genomen. De toenmalige premier
Sharon stond daar vierkant achter, want de beslissing was in zijn
woorden 'volledig in lijn' met de opvatting van zijn regering die 'de
versterking van de nederzettingen ziet als een van haar doeleinden'. De
beslissing werd toen echter niet uitgevoerd, vooral door verzet van de
organen die het hoger onderwijs reguleren. In 2007 besloot het AriĂŤl
College, dat geĂŻrriteerd was over het uitstel, zichzelf AriĂŤl
University Center (HaMerkaz haUniversiti AriĂŤl beShomron).te noemen. De
toenmalige minister van Onderwijs Juli Tami (Arbeid) noemde dat toen
misleiding. Maar Tamirs partijgenoot Barak maakt nu aan die situatie
een einde, door te zwichten voor druk van de Israel Beitenu Partij van
Avigdor Lieberman, zo bericht Haaretz . Volgens Ynet
wordt het instituut in eerste instantie erkend als Ăniversiteits
Centrum, en zal in een paar jaar de beslissing vallen dat het IsraĂŤls
achtste universiteit wordt. De AriĂŤl Universiteit wordt met dit
besluit bij mijn weten de eerste illegale universiteit ter wereld.
Links in de Knesset reageerde scherp. Chaim Oron, de leider van de
linkse partij Meretz, zei dat zelfs mensen met een uiterst scherp
gezichtsvermogen en het vermogen om de kleinste nuances te
onderscheiden moeite hebben om ook maar het het geringste verschil in
uitgangspunten te ontwaren tussen Ehud Barak (van de scialistische
Arbeid) en Benyamin Netanyahu (van de Likud). Hij waarschuwde dat de
beslissing zal leiden tot een versterking van de internationale tendens
tot een academische boycot van Israel. Ahmed Tibi van de Verenigde
Arabische Lijst sloot zich hierbij aan. Hana Swaid van Hadash zei dat
de regering beter een nieuwe universiteit in de (Arabische) stad
Nazareth zou kunnen beginnen als zij zo nodig meer universiteiten
wilde.. Het insituut in AriĂŤl werd in 1982 opgericht als een
Likud-venture. President van de Raad van Bestuur is de voormalige
Likud-minister van Defensie Moshe Arens. De universiteit streeft ernaar
in 2020 een aantal studenten van 20.000 te halen en maakt geen geheim
van haar ideologische kleur. Zo meldt zij op haar website :
As a demonstratively Zionist institution, the University Center has two
key requirements: every student must study one course per semester on
some aspect of Judaism, Jewish heritage or Land of Israel studies, and
the Israeli flag must be displayed in every classroom, laboratory and
auditorium on campus. Mij interesseerde vooral wat er
door de sectie political science werd gedoceerd. De website vertelt dat
het dit studiejaar een simulatie-project van de diplomatie in het
Midden-Oosten is. Ongetwijfeld nuttig. Maar een studie van de
mogelijkheden in het kader van de EĂŠnstaats-oplossing komen misschien
toch meer in aanmerking. Bron ---------------------------------------------------------------Electronic Intifada
BDS. Uphill battle for academic freedom in US universities Reageer (0) By Nora Barrows-Friedman
University students demonstrate at Hampshire college. (Hampshire SJP )
11-1-2010University students demonstrate at Hampshire college. (Hampshire SJP) In
2009, Hampshire College in Amherst, Massachusetts, became the first
American higher educational institution to successfully pressure its
Board of Trustees to divest from Israel-tied mutual funds. The
victory came three decades after the college similarly disinvested from
funds linked to apartheid South Africa. Across North America,
student-led Palestine activism groups have used the methods formulated
by the Palestinian-led call for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS)
"to implement divestment initiatives against Israel, similar to those
applied to South Africa in the apartheid era, until Israel meets its
obligation to recognize the Palestinian people's inalienable right to
self-determination and fully complies with international law."
Hampshire College's divestment move was a victory for the students and
the administration of Hampshire College, and an inspirational model for
hundreds of activism groups across North American campuses. But
despite the expanding and momentous student-led BDS movement, open
dialogue around the reality of the situation in occupied Palestine
continues to be an uphill battle for many professors inside the
classrooms. Educators who openly align with the BDS movement, or speak
out against Israeli-US policy in Palestine and the region, are being
harassed, threatened, blacklisted, denied tenure and fired from their
academic posts.Denied tenure at Ithaca College Margo
Ramlal-Nankoe, former professor of Sociology at Ithaca College in New
York, said that after she started addressing issues of human rights
abuses in occupied Palestine -- especially after the start of the
second Palestinian intifada -- she was warned by faculty members at the
college that she was "risking" her career and "would suffer
repercussions from the administration." Ramlal-Nankoe told The
Electronic Intifada (EI) that the verbal threats eventually led to
alleged racist and sexist attacks, and an open death threat from a
faculty member who protested Ramlal-Nankoe's support of a department
colleague whose husband was Palestinian. "He [made] a cut-throat
gesture with his hand across his neck to me," Ramlal-Nankoe said. She
was later denied tenure in 2007. With the tenure review board voting
unanimously against her, alleging she did not "fit in the department,"
faculty colleagues had encouraged the board to "stop hiring third-world
elites," and told them that Ramlal-Nankoe's position in the department
should instead go to a "native-born American." "My tenure
debacle started in 2005," Ramlal-Nankoe told EI. "I received a strong
majority vote in support of my tenure in 2005 from the Sociology Tenure
Committee. However, the Dean committed violations in my tenure review
and denied me tenure. I appealed the dean's decision and the violations
by him and a minority in the Sociology tenure committee. After I won
the appeal in April 2006, the provost halted my tenure review and
proposed to have a new tenure review in 2007 to correct the violations.
This provost was fired soon after his decision." Ramlal-Nankoe
attributed the core of the attacks and her denial of tenure to her
support of Ithaca College's Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP)
group, her organization of a series of Palestine-Israel-themed speaking
events on campus (including guests such as Palestinian legislator Hanan
Ashrawi, EI's Ali Abunimah, and former UN Humanitarian Coordinator in
Iraq Denis Halliday) and her public criticism of Israel's ongoing
military occupation and violations of human rights in Palestine. The
college's Hillel organization was also aggressive in its attacks
against on-campus criticism of Israeli policy. Furthermore,
Ramlal-Nankoe alleged that the college's dean of the Humanities and
Sciences Department at the time of her tenure denial, Howard Erlich,
was "known" for his personal retaliation against faculty and staff who
he considered to be "too sympathetic" to the Palestinian cause). She
also asserted that Erlich denied funding requests for educational
programs on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, classifying them as
"anti-Israeli." Ramlal-Nankoe added that at this time, Erlich had
stated to her that his son was serving in the Israeli army. Professor
Ramlal-Nankoe has filed a lawsuit against Ithaca College, but it has
not been resolved, she said, despite lengthy appeals and publications.
Her case is now under investigation by the New York State Human Rights
Commission and the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. North Carolina State University case Film
studies professor Terri Ginsberg, similarly fired in 2008 by North
Carolina State University (NCSU) in what she says was a punishment for
her outspoken criticism of "Zionism, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict,
and US Middle East policy," believes that institutionalized censorship
on the Palestine-Israel issue in the academic realm is eerily
reminiscent of the McCarthy era of the 1950s and '60s. "So many of the
dynamics and methods of discrimination perpetrated against today's
scholarly critics of Israel and US Middle East policy derive from and
continue, in updated fashion, practices initiated and implemented
during that shameful period," she says. Ginsberg told EI that
she was strongly encouraged to apply for the tenure track position at
NCSU because of her strong academic service record and favorable
student evaluations. But when she began publicly criticizing US-Israeli
policy in the Middle East inside and outside the classroom, the
administration retaliated against her and she was "punished with
partial removal from -- and interference in -- duty, non-renewal of
contract and rejection from a tenure-track position." She remarked that
since then, her entire professional academic career has been crippled.
"I have been veritably blacklisted from the university classroom,
ostracized by many of my colleagues, and have been forced to endure
unnecessary, unwarranted economic hardship and psychological distress,"
Ginsberg said. Ginsberg also filed a legal complaint against
NCSU, accusing the administration of discrimination and violation of
the North Carolina Constitution, alleging freedom of speech violations
and employment prejudice. Terri Ginsberg's legal counsel, Rima
Kapitan, told EI that she expects NCSU to file a response to the
lawsuit soon. Kapitan added, "The pervasiveness of restrictions on
Palestine-related speech in today's academic climate is shocking, given
our Constitution's speech protections and our society's idealistic
conception of academia as a bastion of open dialogue and debate." Scare
tactics on campuses by administrations and outside Zionist-aligned
groups, Kapitan asserted, have resulted in widespread "self-censorship"
by untenured or adjunct professors. Combined with a paradigm in which
campus administrators and program coordinators take "neutral" stances
on the so-called Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Kapitan said that
"voices critical of Israel are often either banned or are not permitted
unless they are heard alongside Zionist perspectives ...[Academia] is a
very dangerous climate for critics of Zionism."Hostile climate Working
alongside discriminatory academic administrations are right-wing
Zionist groups, such as the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East
Reporting in America (CAMERA) and Campus Watch. Campus Watch in
particular has been a strong force behind smear campaigns against
university professors such as Terri Ginsberg. Campus Watch describes
itself as a "project of the Middle East Forum" that "seeks to have an
influence over the future course of Middle East studies" on US college
campuses. However, it has been instrumental in vilifying and
discrediting distinguished, well-known academic critics of Zionism and
Israeli policies such as Norman Finkelstein (denied tenure in June 2007
from DePaul University), and Joel Kovel (fired from Bard College in
2008 in what Koval claimed was a thinly-veiled attempt by the college
to categorize the firing as a necessary and nonpolitical budget cut).
The Middle East Forum (MEF) is a right-wing think tank based in
Philadelphia that "define[s] and promote[s] ... US interests in the
Middle East [including] fighting radical Islam; working for Palestinian
acceptance of Israel; robustly asserting US interests vis-a-vis Saudi
Arabia; and developing strategies to deal with Iraq and contain Iran."
Daniel Pipes, director of the MEF and a top neoconservative American
academic, was quoted in 2001 by the Washington Report on Middle East
Affairs as saying, "the Palestinians are a miserable people ... and
they deserve to be." Ginsberg said that because of the hostile
climate within certain academic structures, combined with external
pressure by these so-called watchdog groups that seek to silence
criticism of Israeli policy, academic workers are made to "self-censor
in order to locate and retain albeit meager employment, producing a
chilling environment for permanent faculty as well ... Meanwhile,
non-conforming Jewish voices and perspectives continue to be held with
suspicion and condemnation, not least when they articulate solidarity
with the oppressed." She said that her academic and intellectual
work was highly influenced by her Palestine activism, and "greatly
enhanced" her ability to make "informed, well-rounded scholarly
judgments about the conflict's academic and cultural expression,
discern true from false facts about it, and convey them to my students
and in my writing -- writing which would also begin to analyze the
ensuing, heightened suppression of academic speech critical of Zionism
and US Middle East policy." Slashed from the classroom but
undeterred in her political activism, she continues to pursue
"scholarly, activist and public intellectual work on Palestine/Israel
and on Middle Eastern culture in critical light of US and European
policy and attitudes toward the region."Fight for academic freedom Ramlal-Nankoe's
and Ginsberg's battles come at a time when there are both controversies
and victories in the fight for academic freedom. In New York, Nadia
Abou El Haj, professor of Anthropology at Barnard, became the focus of
an online petition to deny her tenure, organized in part by a Barnard
graduate who lives in the illegal Israeli settlement colony of Maale
Addumim in the occupied West Bank. Despite external pressure, Barnard
granted El Haj full tenure in 2007. Additionally, Joseph Massad,
EI contributor and professor of Modern Arab Politics and Intellectual
History at Columbia University, was finally granted tenure in 2009
after a years-long public struggle. Massad was the favored target of
pro-Zionist student groups who sought to dismantle his tenure
application in 2005 by discrediting him in the media in an attempt to
pressure the tenure review board. After Columbia's decision to grant
Massad tenure, The New York Post and The Huffington Post, among many
other media outlets, ran pieces decrying the outcome. Anna Kelner wrote
in The Huffington Post: "[W]hen Columbia University granted tenure to
Joseph Massad ... the University jeopardized its long-standing
commitment to cultivating and supporting its Jewish student population." EI also reported on the controversy surrounding Professor William Robinson at UC Santa Barbara ,
who, after emailing his students with a sharp critique of Israel's
attack on the Gaza Strip last winter, was accused by pro-Zionist
student groups (backed by the Anti-Defamation League and the Simon
Wiesenthal Center) of faculty misconduct; but the case was thrown out
by university officials in June of 2009. Hindering the debate However,
Ramlal-Nankoe and Ginsberg are still worried. They believe that by
attacking, censoring and firing professors because of their political
activism specifically on this issue, university students are disallowed
the broad-based political education necessary to understand the reality
in Israel-Palestine. "The overall situation in this respect will
only deteriorate unless, in contrast to the McCarthy era, public and
academic outcry, organized protest and transformative praxis are
marshaled to bring about a constructive reversal in the current,
nefarious trend," Ginsberg observed. "The ... Gaza Freedom March is one
such protest, the BDS movement yet another. But we should not, at the
same time, ignore troubles on the home-front. Persons dedicated to
teaching the history and culture of Palestine justice struggles, for
prime instance, must be allowed to do so unhindered by the fear and
economic insecurity wrought by a higher educational system in which
academic freedom has sadly devolved almost completely into academic
'free enterprise.'" Professor Margo Ramlal-Nankoe agrees. "The
repercussions on faculty who dare to speak out against injustices [are]
abysmal and contradict and defeat, in my opinion, the whole purpose of
education and critical inquiry. In other words, it is anti-education." Professor
Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University Richard Falk, who
is currently the United Nation's Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in
the Occupied Palestinian Territories, said he, too, is concerned about
"diverging trends in relation to academic freedom for those who express
sharply critical views of Israel [and] Zionism" "My only advice
[to professors], having been attacked for several decades," Falk added,
"is to make yourself as invulnerable as possible in relation to the
standard expectations that prevail in universities: publish in
scholarly venues, teach reliably and with receptivity to diverse
opinions, and be a useful colleague, but do not abandon your conscience
or your identity as an engaged citizen with critical views." Falk
told EI that the growing BDS movement, specifically within the academic
and cultural boycott call against Israeli apartheid, is an effective
course of action amongst educators and cultural workers of conscience.
"There seems to be diverging trends in relation to academic freedom for
those who express sharply critical views of Israel or Zionism," Falk
remarked. "On the one side there is growing sympathy for the
Palestinian struggle, and this is exhibited by the spreading BDS
campaign. On the other side, there are increased efforts by organized
Zionist groups to exert covert and overt pressure on university
administrations to punish those seen as critics of Israel. As a result,
we can expect some inconsistent outcomes in this period." Currently,
according to the US Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (USACBI)
campaign, more than 450 American educators and 125 writers,
journalists, artists and musicians (including this writer and EI's Ali
Abunimah) have signed onto the national statement. The BDS campaign is
gaining ground as academics stand up for their beliefs -- and resist
the aggressive political pressure -- within American educational
institutions. Nora Barrows-Friedman is the
co-host and Senior Producer of Flashpoints, a daily investigative
newsmagazine on Pacifica Radio. She is also a correspondent for Inter
Press Service. She regularly reports from Palestine, where she also
runs media workshops for youth in the Dheisheh refugee camp in the
occupied West Bank.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------PNN Gaza student holds graduation party at church
11-1-2010Palestinian
student Berlanty Azzam has never thought that her graduation ceremony
would take place in a small church far away from her university and
friends. After spending four years studying in Bethlehem
University in the West Bank, and two months before her course finishes,
Israeli soldiers kicked her to the Gaza Strip since her ID tells that
she is a Gazan. "I never imagined that my graduation
ceremony will be held in a church with no one from my classmates
attending," said the 22-year-old. "After all I graduated
from Bethlehem University," she said, holding her certificate and
posing for pictures with friends at the Holy Family Catholic Church in
Gaza city. Berlanty's graduation has a long, two-month story
of steadfastness and defiance started when she was sent to Gaza in
October 2009. Israeli human rights group "Gisha" waged a
legal war against the Israeli army to let Berlanty return to finish her
studies at the university, but all the attempts came up against a brick
wall after the Israeli high court decided that Berlanty should not
return to the West Bank. This led the Bethlehem University
to intervene decisively, taking a decision to provide Berlanty with the
classes she needs in Gaza before it is too late. Arriving in
Gaza to hand Berlanty her certificate, Vice-chancellor of the Bethlehem
University Peter Bray, said the university has a commitment to help
Berlanty graduate and the only successful step was providing her with
classes through the internet and phone. "We tried it and it
worked out and we are going to use it in case Israel is deporting any
of our Gaza students," he proudly said. Antonio Franco, a
representative of the Pope Archbishop, which sponsors Bethlehem
University, has also traveled all way to Gaza to meet Berlanty and
grant her bachelor degree in business administration. "We
came to show support and success," said Bray as he rushed to attend a
mass dedicated to his "outstanding student" Berlanty. The
moments when Archbishop Franco held special mass for Berlanty in the
church were very touching. Tears rolled down her cheeks, and many of
her friends and relatives in the service shed tears as well.
"I really wanted to be among my colleagues in such a day," she said as
she lit a candle and kneeled after the homily and the readings as peace
overwhelmed the church. "I still don't know why I was deported to Gaza."
According to Israeli media estimations, some 25,000 Palestinians in the
West Bank are at risk of being removed from their homes and separated
from their families, jobs and studies, simply because they are from
Gaza. Since 2000, Israel has banned Palestinian students
from Gaza from studying at Palestinian universities in the West Bank,
except for limited cases like Berlanty, who is a Christian.
In 2007, when Islamic Hamas movement seized control of Gaza, Israel
started to deal with the coastal Strip as a hostile entity since its
Islamist rulers are sworn to the destruction of the Jewish state.
"They did not even let me stay there for a few weeks to finish my
studies as if I was a security threat to the state of Israel," Berlanty
said, holding many roses from people who came to congratulate.
"Studying at a Palestinian university is my right and the right of
every Palestinian student. I will apply again for Bethlehem University
for MA and will legally fight Israel until I enjoy my rights to learn
and move freely," she said. Source: Xinhua Source ---------------------------------------------------------------CAUT Canadian Association of University teachersBasic Academic Freedoms and Rights Violated in Israel and Palestinian Territories 7-1-2020Ottawa
and Brussels â The academic freedom and professional rights of higher
education teaching personnel in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza are
increasingly under assault as a result of the continuing political
conflict in the region, according to a report released today by Education International and the Canadian Association of University Teachers. âBoth
Israeli and Palestinian academics are facing greater pressure from
outside political influences and from within the academy itself,â says
David Robinson, associate executive director of CAUT and author of the
report. âThere are clear and consistent violations of internationally
recognized academic rights as detailed in UNESCOâs 1997 Recommendation
Concerning the Status of Higher Education Teaching Personnel.â The study, The Status of Higher Education Teaching Personnel in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza ,
found that the strong polarization of opinions within Israel over the
political conflict between Israelis and Palestinians has generated
several prominent academic freedom controversies in recent years. In
addition, proposed changes to the governance of Israeli universities
threaten to weaken institutional autonomy and academic freedom. However,
it is in the Palestinian territories that the report finds the most
serious violations of basic academic freedoms and rights. âMany
of the violations of academic freedom in the West Bank and Gaza are a
result of the Israeli occupation,â says Robinson. âIsrael
unquestionably has legitimate security concerns and has a right and
responsibility to defend its citizens. However, as documented in the
report, the near complete blockade of the Gaza Strip and the tight
travel restrictions imposed on residents within the West Bank go beyond
what can be reasonably justified and have seriously disrupted the work
of Palestinian scholars.â Limits imposed on freedom of movement
within the Palestinian territories make it difficult and in many cases
impossible for Palestinian academics and students to attend conferences
or study abroad, and have forced local universities to shut down early
and to close entirely for extended periods. There are bans on the
import of certain research equipment and materials needed to pursue
scholarly activities, and many academics face arbitrary arrest and
detention by both Israeli and Palestinian authorities. The
report argues that the restrictions on academic freedom are undermining
the democratic development of the West Bank and Gaza and are
frustrating the peace process. âIsraeli and Palestinian
universities and colleges have a critical role to play in helping find
peaceful solutions to the conflict,â says Monique Fouilhoux, deputy
general secretary of Education International. âBut they can only do
this if their scholars are free to express their views and debate
controversial matters without fear of recrimination.â The report
recommends ways that higher education associations and unions worldwide
can provide expertise and support to Israeli and Palestinian colleagues
to help improve their conditions of employment and assert their
professional rights as recognized by the UNESCO Recommendation. Education
International is the global union federation representing more than 30
million teachers and education workers in 172 countries and territories. The
Canadian Association of University Teachers represents more than 67,000
academic and general staff at colleges and universities across Canada.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Electronic Intifada Press release United States Campaign for an Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, 24 December 2009 The
following press release was issued by the United States Campaign for an
Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (USACBI) on 23 December 2009: 23-12-200927
December 2009 marks the one-year anniversary of the beginning of
"Operation Cast Lead," Israel's 22-day assault on the captive
population of Gaza, which killed 1,400 people, one third of them
children, and injured more than 5,300. During this war on
an impoverished, mostly refugee population, Israel targeted civilians,
using internationally-proscribed white phosphorous bombs, deprived them
of power, water and other essentials, and sought to destroy the
infrastructure of Palestinian civil society, including hospitals,
administrative buildings and UN facilities. It targeted with peculiar
consistency educational institutions of all kinds: the Islamic
University of Gaza, the Ministry of Education, the American
International School, at least ten UNRWA schools, one of which was
sheltering internally displaced Palestinian civilians with nowhere to
flee, and tens of other schools and educational facilities. While
world leaders have tragically failed to come to Gaza's help, civilians
everywhere are rallying to show their solidarity with the Palestinian
people, with anniversary vigils taking place this week in New York,
Washington DC, Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Boston, Los Angeles,
and many more cities and towns in the US and world-wide. The
United States Campaign for an Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
was formed in the immediate aftermath of Operation Cast Lead, bringing
together educators of conscience who were unable to stand by and watch
in silence Israel's indiscriminate assault on the Gaza Strip and its
educational institutions. Today, over 500 US-based academics, authors,
artists, musicians, poets and other arts professionals have endorsed
our call. Our academic endorsers include postcolonial critics and
transnational feminists Chandra Talpade Mohanty and Gayatri Chakravorty
Spivak, Indigenous scholars J. Kehaulani Kauanui and Andrea Smith,
philosopher Judith Butler, Black studies scholars Cedric Robinson, Fred
Moten, evolutionary biologist Robert Trivers, and intellectual
historian Joseph Massad. "Cultural workers" who have endorsed
our call include well known author Barbara Ehrenreich, The Electronic
Intifada cofounder Ali Abunimah, poets Adrienne Rich and Lisa Suhair
Majjaj, International Solidarity Movement cofounder and documentary
filmmaker Adam Shapiro, Jordan Flaherty of Left Turn Magazine, and
Adrienne Maree Brown of the Ruckus Society. Among the 34
organizations supporting our mission are and the US Campaign to End the
Israeli Occupation, the Green Party, Code Pink, INCITE! Women of Color
Against Violence, Artists Against Apartheid and Teachers Against the
Occupation. The Advisory Board of the United States Campaign for an
Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (USACBI) has grown to include
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Hamid Dabashi, Lawrence Davidson, Bill
Fletcher Jr., Glen Ford, Mark Gonzales, Marilyn Hacker, Edward Herman,
Annemarie Jacir, J. Kehaulani Kauanui, Robin Kelley, Ilan Pappe, James
Petras, Vijay Prashad, Andrenne Rich, Michel Shehadeh and Lisa Taraki. Israeli
academics listed among the organization's International Endorsers have
also joined us, including Emmanuel Farjoun, Hebrew University; Rachel
Giora, Tel Aviv University; Anat Matar, Tel Aviv University; Kobi
Snitz, Technion; and Ilan Pappe now at Exeter. The USACBI
Mission Statement calls for a boycott of Israeli academic and cultural
institutions in support of an appeal by the Palestinian Campaign for
the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel. Individual Israelis are
not targeted by the boycott. Specifically, supporters are asked to: (1)
Refrain from participation in any form of academic and cultural
cooperation, collaboration or joint projects with Israeli institutions
that do not vocally oppose Israeli state policies against Palestine; (2)
Advocate a comprehensive boycott of Israeli institutions at the
national and international levels, including suspension of all forms of
funding and subsidies to these institutions; (3) Promote divestment and disinvestment from Israel by international academic institutions; (4)
Work toward the condemnation of Israeli policies by pressing for
resolutions to be adopted by academic, professional and cultural
associations and organizations; (5) Support Palestinian academic
and cultural institutions directly without requiring them to partner
with Israeli counterparts as an explicit or implicit condition for such
support. This boycott, modeled upon the global boycott,
divestment and sanctions movement that put an end to South African
apartheid, is to continue until Israel meets its obligation to
recognize the Palestinian people's inalienable right to
self-determination and fully complies with the precepts of
international law by: 1. Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall; 2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and 3.
Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees
to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution
194.Source --------------------------------------------------------------- Gaza Freedom March Contact: Maryam Khan, Student Press Coordinator 925.640.5376 maryamkhan31@gmail.com www.gazafreedommarch.org 100 International Students to Participate in International Delegation 1,000 Delegates from 42 Countries 18-12-2009 Over
one hundred students from around the world will be traveling to Gaza
this winter to participate in the Gaza Freedom March. On December 31,
over 1,000 international delegates will join Palestinians in a
non-violent march from Northern Gaza to the Israeli border calling for
an end to the siege. The march is a historic initiative to break the
ongoing US-backed Israeli blockade against Gaza. The group of
international students plans to meet with their peers at Gazan
universities who will have a chance to share their experiences as youth
in the war torn territory. Students in America have been fundraising
not only to pay for their travel expenses but also to bring thousands
of dollars of aid into the strip. Nuha Masri, a student from
California, sold baked goods at school in order to get to the march,
which will be her first trip back to Palestine since her family left
when she was eleven years old. Julia Hurley, a student in New Jersey,
fundraised over 12,000 dollars to bring aid to Palestinian youth
suffering as a result of the blockade. For Ali Glenesk, a student at UC
Berkeley and American student coordinator for the march, this will be
her third trip to Gaza. She states that, âUpon visiting Gaza, the
realities of the siege cannot be denied. It is imperative that
Americans work to lift the siege because our tax dollars are going to
support it.â Deema Mishal, a medical student, Gazan peace
activist, and the Palestinian student coordinator for the march, has
been working closely with Glenesk to organize the student delegation.
She firmly believes that the march is a means to highlight Gazaâs
condition as a whole. She says that, âwe have to change the reality
that is happening here now. The people in this land deserve to have a
normal life without all the fears that we wake up with everyday, we
only want peace.â Mishal also states that âthis is the first time ever
that the Palestinians come together in such large numbers along with
internationals to say no to repression.â Inside Gaza, excitement is
growing. Representatives of all aspects of civil society, including
students, professors, refugee groups, unions, women's organizations,
and NGOs, have been busy organizing and it is estimated that at least
50,000 Palestinians will participate. The iDocs Group in San
Francisco in cooperation with The Media Group in Gaza City has begun
filming a feature length documentary about the march. The film will
show how both Palestinians and internationals prepare for the march and
follow them throughout their experience. Producers plan to highlight
Mishal and Glenesk, and the student movement they have begun to build
across borders. Glenesk explains her continued involvement, saying, âI
guess I keep going back because you simply can't deny or turn away from
the injustice once you've been there and seen it. The heartwarming
thing about the student group though, is that we can spend the day
witnessing and talking about things that no human being should ever
have to experience, but then later be sitting around playing guitar and
having fun. There is hope in that.â For more information see www.gazafreedommarch.org Deema Mishal dm.meshal@gmail.com Ali Glenesk ali.glenesk@gmail.com Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Sabah blog Rules of human decency apply to Israelis too A dose of their own (academic) medicine might help the message sink in
Berlanty Azzam, 21,was handcuffed and blindfolded
By Stuart Littlewood 11-12-2009Poor Berlanty. What did she do to deserve this crushing blow to her hopes and life chances? The
Israeli High Court has denied her justice â again â and prevented
Berlanty Azzam returning to Bethlehem University for the final few
weeks to complete her degree. On 28 October this Christian
student at the Vatican-sponsored Bethlehem University was abducted by
the IDF, "the world's most moral army", after attending a job interview
in Ramalla, then blindfolded and handcuffed and dumped in Gaza. She had
lived in the West Bank since 2005 after being granted a permit. There
was only one kind of permit available in 2005 â an entry permit to
Israel. But the Israeli State claimed that this permit was insufficient
and Berlanty should have obtained some other permit, even though the
State admits that none existed at the time. State
representatives took her permit, a key piece of evidence, and never
produced it to the Court. After six weeks of double-talk the Court
accepted the State's claim that Berlanty entered the West Bank
illegally. We hear a lot about how independent Israel's justice system
is. Here's proof, if any were needed, that it is simply a tool of the
military. To avoid accusations that her residence was not
Bethlehem, Berlanty had for the last four years resisted the temptation
to return to Gaza and visit her folks. She and her parents submitted
numerous applications to change the Gaza address recorded on her
identity card to her actual place of residence, Bethlehem, but to no
avail. Israel controls the Palestinian population registry and refuses
to register changes in address from the Gaza Strip to the West Bank â
another example of how Gazans are effectively imprisoned. This,
of course, is in breach of her human rights. The West Bank and the Gaza
Strip are internationally recognized as one integral territory and
under international law everyone has the right to freely choose their
place of residence within a single territory. In 1999 Israel and the
Palestinian Authority signed an agreement establishing a 28 mile road
corridor giving Palestinians safe passage between the two parts of
Palestine â yet another empty gesture. "We are disappointed that
the Israeli military and High Court have interfered with the Church's
educational mission at Bethlehem University by denying Berlanty to be
brought back to Bethlehem to complete her studies," said Brother Peter
Bray, the Vice Chancellor, on hearing the Court ruling. "We realize
that Berlanty is one of the many people in Gaza who suffer so unjustly."Indeed.
Since 2000 Israel has implemented a sweeping ban preventing youngsters
from Gaza from studying at Palestinian universities in the West Bank. A
2007 High Court decision determined that students from Gaza wishing to
study in the West Bank should be allowed to do so "in cases that would
have positive humanitarian implications". (bold H.) However,
to the best of her legal team's knowledge, since that judgment was
handed down Israel hasn't issued a single entry permit. Only last
summer 12 students from Gaza were refused permits to study at Bethlehem
University. Back in the late 1990s, about 1,000 students from Gaza
studied in the West Bank, most of them in disciplines that are not
offered in the Gaza Strip. Like Berlanty, an estimated 25,000
people currently living in the West Bank have been declared "illegal"
by Israel solely because the address on their identity card is in the
Gaza Strip. Some of them have lived in the West Bank for decades but
Israel simply does not recognize their right to be there. They are
extremely limited in their daily movements and live in fear of being
detained and 'deported', just as Berlanty was. Consequently they have
very limited opportunities for employment, business and studies. This
policy not only breaches Israel's obligations under international
accords to treat the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as a "single
territorial entity" but it also chokes any prospect of healthy
development in Palestinian society. It is no use pretending that things will change until other countries give Israel a dose of their own medicine. How
does the Berlanty case and the thousands like it sit with the great and
the good who piously reject the idea of an academic boycott against
Israel? (bold H.) All political parties fight against
such a for muddle-headed reasons. The recent Channel 4 Dispatches
programme uncovered the influence of the Israel lobby and its money on
the Conservative Party. Another particularly obnoxious group that's
hopelessly out of touch with reality is the Liberal Democrat Friends of
Israel. At their party's conference they tabled a motion squashing an
academic boycott, saying that "Israeli universities are centres of free
debate and discussion and that the universities contain Jews, Muslims,
Christians, Israelis and Palestinians. Furthermore a boycott does
nothing to resolve a negotiated solution to the Israel/Palestine
conflict and is indeed counter-productive as it discourages dialogue."
This motion against the boycott was passed with an overwhelming
majority. The aim of the Liberal Democrats Friends of Israel is
to "maximise support for the State of Israel within the party and
Parliament" and "encourage a broad understanding of Israel's unique
political position as the only democracy in the Middle East". Their stated purpose isâŚ. â To influence the Party's Middle East policy so it places a high priority on Israel's right to peace and security. - To provide parliamentarians with briefing material for parliamentary debates, questions to Ministers and public appearances. - To rebut attacks on Israel in the media, Parliament and the Party. - To liaise with Israeli politicians and Government. - To arrange and accompany LDFI delegations to Israel. - To keep in regular contact with the Embassy of Israel. In other words they act as a prop within the British parliament for this racist military regime. Such
blind allegiance and bizarre conduct contribute to the tragedy of
Berlanty and countless other Palestinian youngsters. Without these
beacons of misplaced support across the Western world lawless Israel
would be sunk. * Stuart Littlewood is author of
the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the plight of the
Palestinians under occupation. Read other articles by Stuart, or visit
Stuart's website.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Electronic Intifada Sussex University students vote to boycott Israeli goods 6-11-2009 The following press release was issued by the University of Sussex Students' Union on 5 November 2009:Students
at the University of Sussex, England have voted to boycott Israeli
goods. The decision follows the Palestinian call for boycott,
divestment and sanctions against Israel, which calls upon the Israeli
state to respect international law and end the occupation of Palestine. In a campus-wide referendum, 56 percent of students voted in favor of the boycott. The referendum was held by the University of Sussex Students' Union (USSU), which represents the institution's 11,000 students. Goods
from Israel will no longer be stocked in USSU shops on the university
campus, and USSU will be lobbying the university administration to
observe the boycott. Tom Wills, USSU President, said "Israel has
broken more UN resolutions than any other state. No other
Western-backed democracy has committed such egregious violations of
international law, but the international community has failed to hold
Israel to account. "Sussex was one of the first universities to
boycott South Africa during apartheid, and we hope that this will help
kickstart an international movement on a similar scale to put pressure
on Israel to end its oppression of the Palestinian people. "We call on students at other universities to table boycott motions in their own unions." Earlier
this year the Israeli attack on Gaza triggered a resurgence in student
activism in the UK, with a wave of sit-in protests at universities
including Sussex. The student boycott comes after the Trades Union
Congress (TUC) backed a boycott of Israeli settlement goods in
September. USSU currently also boycotts Coca-Cola and Nestle in protest at unethical business practices by those corporations.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------
Palestine Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel
Guidelines for Applying the International Academic Boycott of Israel 1-10-2009Since
its founding in 2004, PACBI has advocated a boycott of Israeli academic
and cultural institutions, based on the premise that these institutions
are complicit in the system of oppression that has denied Palestinians
their basic rights guaranteed by international law. This
position is in line with the authoritative call by the Palestinian
Council for Higher Education for "non-cooperation in the scientific and
technical fields between Palestinian and Israeli universities"[1].
Academic institutions in particular are part of the ideological and
institutional scaffolding of the Zionist colonial project in Palestine,
and as such are deeply implicated in maintaining the structures of
domination over the Palestinian people. Since its founding, the
Israeli academy has cast its lot with the hegemonic political-military
establishment in Israel, and notwithstanding the efforts of a handful
of principled academics, carries on business-as-usual in support of the
status quo. The beginnings of the academic boycott of Israel can
be traced to 2002, the year in which Israel launched its destructive
assault upon Palestinian cities, towns, refugee camps and villages,
targeting the institutions of Palestinian society and wreaking havoc on
communities, residential neighborhoods, and urban infrastructure. The
April 2002 statement by 120 European academics and researchers urging
the adoption of a moratorium on EU and European Science Foundation
support for Israel was followed by a number of pro-boycott initiatives
in the same year by academics in the USA, France, Norway, and
Australia. Particularly noteworthy have been the annual congresses of
UK academicsâ unions, where boycott-related resolutions have been
debated and passed since 2002. PACBIâs key partner in the UK, BRICUP
[2] has been instrumental in the ongoing struggle to popularize the
academic boycott in the union movement in the UK and beyond. In
October 2003, the first Palestinian Call for Boycott was issued by a
group of Palestinian academics and intellectuals in the diaspora and
the occupied Palestinian Territory. Building on all previous boycott
initiatives, PACBI issued its Call for an Academic and Cultural Boycott
of Israel in Ramallah in 2004, providing the Palestinian reference for
a steadily growing and sustainable institutional academic boycott
effort throughout the world. The lethal Israeli assault on the Gaza
Strip in December 2008-January 2009 served as a catalyst for further
activism, and the period since then has witnessed a tremendous growth
of initiatives in the spirit of BDS and targeting Israeli academic
institutions. Such efforts have come from Australia, Canada, Norway,
Sweden, Scotland, Lebanon, Spain and the United States. Particularly
encouraging has been the founding of the US Campaign for the Academic
and Cultural boycott of Israel (USACBI), inspired by PACBI and basing
itself upon the PACBI Call. During five years of intensive work
with partners in several countries to promote the academic boycott
against Israel, PACBI has examined many academic projects and events,
assessing the applicability of the boycott criteria to them and,
accordingly, has issued open letters, statements or advisory opinions
on them. Based on this experience and in response to the burgeoning
demand for PACBIâs specific guidelines on applying the academic boycott
to diverse projects, from conferences to exchange programs and research
efforts, the Campaign lays out below unambiguous, consistent and
coherent criteria and guidelines that specifically address the nuances
and particularities of the academy. These guidelines are mainly
intended to assist academics around the world in adhering to the
Palestinian call for boycott, as a contribution towards establishing a
just peace in our region. Similar guidelines for the cultural boycott
have been issued by PACBI [3]. Academic Boycott Guidelines Inspired
by the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa as well as the long
tradition of civil resistance against settler-colonialism in Palestine,
the PACBI Call [4] urges academics and cultural workers âto comprehensively and consistently boycott all Israeli academic and cultural institutions as a contribution to the struggle to end Israelâs occupation, colonization and system of apartheid, by applying the following: 1.
Refrain from participation in any form of academic and cultural
cooperation, collaboration or joint projects with Israeli institutions; 2.
Advocate a comprehensive boycott of Israeli institutions at the
national and international levels, including suspension of all forms of
funding and subsidies to these institutions; 3. Promote divestment and disinvestment from Israel by international academic institutions; 4.
Work toward the condemnation of Israeli policies by pressing for
resolutions to be adopted by academic, professional and cultural
associations and organizations; 5. Support Palestinian academic
and cultural institutions directly without requiring them to partner
with Israeli counterparts as an explicit or implicit condition for such
support.â Before discussing the various categories of academic
activities that fall under the boycott call, and as a general
overriding rule, it is important to stress that virtually all Israeli
academic institutions, unless proven otherwise, are complicit in
maintaining the Israeli occupation and denial of basic Palestinian
rights, whether through their silence, actual involvement in
justifying, whitewashing or otherwise deliberately diverting attention
from Israelâs violations of international law and human rights, or
indeed through their direct collaboration with state agencies in the
design and commission of these violations. Accordingly, these
institutions, all their activities, and all the events they sponsor or
support must be boycotted. Events and projects involving individuals
explicitly representing these complicit institutions should be
boycotted, by the same token. Mere institutional affiliation to the
Israeli academy is therefore not a sufficient condition for applying
the boycott. While an individualâs academic freedom should be
fully and consistently respected in this context, an individual
academic, Israeli or not, cannot be exempt from being subject to
boycotts that conscientious citizens around the world (beyond the scope
of the PACBI boycott criteria) may call for in response to what is
widely perceived as a particularly offensive act or statement by the
academic in question (such as direct or indirect incitement to
violence; justification -- an indirect form of advocacy -- of war
crimes and other grave violations of international law; racial slurs;
actual participation in human rights violations; etc.). At this level,
Israeli academics should not be automatically exempted from due
criticism or any lawful form of protest, including boycott; they should
be treated like all other offenders in the same category, not better or
worse. The following guidelines may not be completely
exhaustive and certainly do not preempt, replace or void other,
common-sense rationales for boycott, particularly when a researcher,
speaker, or event is shown to be explicitly justifying, advocating or
promoting war crimes, racial discrimination, apartheid, suppression of
fundamental human rights and serious violations of international law.Based
on the above, PACBI urges academics, academicsâ associations/unions and
academic institutions around the world, where possible and as relevant,
to boycott and/or work towards the cancellation or annulment of events,
activities, agreements, or projects that promote the normalization of
Israel in the global academy, whitewash Israelâs violations of
international law and Palestinians rights, or violate the boycott.
Specifically, the Palestinian academic boycott against Israel applies
to the following events, activities, or situations: 1.
Academic events (such as conferences, symposia, workshops, book and
museum exhibits) convened or co-sponsored by Israeli institutions. All
academic events, whether held in Israel or abroad, and convened or
co-sponsored by Israeli academic institutions or their departments and
institutes, deserve to be boycotted on institutional grounds. These
boycottable activities include panels and other activities sponsored or
organized by Israeli academic bodies or associations at international
conferences outside Israel. Importantly, they also include the
convening in Israel of meetings of international bodies and
associations. 2. Institutional cooperation agreements with
Israeli universities or research institutes. These agreements,
concluded between international and Israeli universities, typically
involve the exchange of faculty and students and, more importantly, the
conduct of joint research. Many of these schemes are sponsored and
funded by the European Union (in the case of Europe), and independent
and government foundations elsewhere. For example, the five-year EU
Framework programs, in which Israel has been the only non-European
participant, have been crucial to the development of research at
Israeli universities. European academic activists have been
campaigning for the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement
since 2002; under this Agreement, Israeli and European universities
exchange academic staff and students and engage in other activities,
mainly through the Erasmus Mundus and Tempus schemes [5]. It should be
noted that Israel is in violation of the terms of this Agreement,
particularly of the second article [6]. 3. Study abroad schemes
in Israel for international students. These programs are usually housed
at Israeli universities and are part of the Israeli propaganda effort,
designed to give international students a âpositive experienceâ of
Israel. Publicity and recruitment for these schemes are organized
through studentsâ affairs offices or academic departments (such as
Middle East and international studies centers) at universities abroad. 4.
Addresses and talks at international venues by official representatives
of Israeli academic institutions such as presidents and rectors. 5.
Special honors or recognition granted to official representatives of
Israeli academic institutions (such as the bestowal of honorary degrees
and other awards) or to Israeli academic or research institutions. Such
institutions and their official representatives are complicit and as
such should be denied this recognition. 6.
Palestinian/Arab-Israeli collaborative research projects or events,
especially those funded by the various EU and international
grant-giving bodies. It is widely known that the easiest route to
securing a research grant for a Palestinian academic is to apply with
an Israeli partner. This is a case of politically motivated research
par excellence, and contributes to enhancing the legitimacy of Israeli
institutions as centers of excellence instead of directly and
independently strengthening the research capacity of Palestinian
institutions. The argument that âscience is above politicsâ is often
used to justify such collaborations. In PACBIâs view, no normal
collaboration between the institutions of the oppressor and the
oppressed, or indeed between the academics of the oppressor and
oppressed can be possible while the structures of domination remain in
place. In fact, such projects do nothing to challenge the status quo
and contribute to its endurance. As an example,
Palestinian/Arab-Israeli research efforts in the field of water and
environment take as given the apartheid reality; tackling
Palestinian/Arab and Israeli water and environmental âproblemsâ as
commensurate, without recognizing the apartheid reality, only
contributes to the continuation of that reality. As in the
cultural field, events and projects (such as those involving educators,
psychologists, or historians) involving Palestinians and/or Arabs and
Israelis that promote âbalanceâ between the âtwo sidesâ in presenting
their respective narratives or âtraumas,â as if on par, or are
otherwise based on the false premise that the colonizers and the
colonized, the oppressors and the oppressed, are equally responsible
for the âconflict,â are intentionally deceptive, intellectually
dishonest and morally reprehensible. Such events and projects, often
seeking to encourage dialogue or âreconciliation between the two sidesâ
without addressing the requirements of justice, promote the
normalization and perpetuation of oppression and injustice. All such
events and projects that bring Palestinians and/or Arabs and Israelis
together, unless based on unambiguous recognition of Palestinian rights
and framed within the explicit context of opposition to occupation and
other forms of Israeli oppression of the Palestinians, are strong
candidates for boycott. Other factors that PACBI takes into
consideration in evaluating such events and projects are the sources of
funding, the design of the project or event, the objectives of the
sponsoring organization(s), the participants, and similar relevant
factors. 7. Research and development activities in the framework
of agreements or contracts between the Israeli government and other
governments or institutions. Researchers in such projects are based at
American, European or other universities. Examples include the United
States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF), an institution
established by the US and Israeli governments in 1972 to sponsor
research by Israelis and Americans, and the âEureka Initiative,â a
European inter-governmental initiative set up in 1985 that includes
Israel as the only non-European member. 8. Research and
development activities on behalf of international corporations
involving contracts or other institutional agreements with departments
or centers at Israeli universities. 9. Institutional membership
of Israeli associations in world bodies. While challenging such
membership is not easy, targeted and selective campaigns demanding the
suspension of Israeli membership in international forums contribute
towards pressuring the state until it respects international law. Just
as South Africaâs membership was suspended in world academic--among
other--bodies during apartheid, so must Israelâs. 10. Publishing
in or refereeing articles for academic journals based at Israeli
universities. These journals include those published by international
associations but housed at Israeli universities. Efforts should be
made to re-locate the editorial offices of these journals to
universities outside Israel. 11. Advising on hiring or promotion
decisions at Israeli universities through refereeing the work of
candidates [7], or refereeing research proposals for Israeli funding
institutions. Such services, routinely provided by academics to their
profession, must be withheld from complicit institutions. PACBI www.PACBI.orgPACBI@PACBI.org Notes: [1]
The Palestinian Council for Higher Education, composed of heads of
Palestinian universities and representatives from the community, has,
since the 1990âs, adhered to its principled position of non-cooperation
with Israeli universities until Israel ends its occupation; this
position was reiterated in a statement of thanks to the UK academic
union NATFHE in 2006: http://www.mohe.gov.ps/ENG/news/index.html#7 [2] www.BRICUP.org.uk [3] http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=1045 [4] http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=869 [5] See http://ec.europa.eu/education/external-relation-programmes/doc70_en.htm and http://ec.europa.eu/education/external-relation-programmes/doc72_en.htm [6] http://www.bdsmovement.net/?q=node/179 [7]
In 2002, more than 700 European academics signed this declaration: "I
can no longer in good conscience continue to cooperate with official
Israeli institutions, including universities. I will attend no
scientific conferences in Israel, and I will not participate as referee
in hiring or promotion decisions by Israeli universities, or in the
decisions of Israeli funding agencies. I will continue to collaborate
with, and host, Israeli scientific colleagues on an individual basis."
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2002/jul/08/highereducation.israel )Source ---------------------------------------------------------------AIC
The Economy of the Occupation 23-24: Academic Boycott of Israel
Academic Boycott of Israel and the Complicity of Israeli Academic Institutions in Occupation of Palestinian Territories 20-10-2009The
idea of an academic boycott of Israel first emerged in 2002 as part of
the growing boycott and divestment campaign against Israel, itself a
part of the struggle against the Israeli occupation of Palestinian
territories and the violation of Palestinian human and national rights. Compared
to other types of boycott, the academic boycott has gathered a relative
amount of widespread support amongst academic unions and organizations,
primarily in Great Britain. Not surprisingly, this relative success has
stirred a public debate and opposition to the boycott, mostly by
pro-Israeli organizations and academics. The campaign for academic
boycott has wavered under these pressures and various degrees and
measures of boycott have since been approved and then often canceled by
academic organizations. The arguments in favor of this kind of boycott
have relied largely on the facts of the Israeli occupation and the idea
of pressuring Israel through its academic world; often, they have not
utilised details relating to the specific academic institutions that
they call to boycott. Through this report, however, the
Alternative Information Center (AIC) aims to inform and empower the
debate on an academic boycott by giving information not on Israeli
violence and violations of international law and human rights, but on
the part played in the Israeli occupation by the very academic
institutions in question. The report demonstrates that Israeli academic
institutions have not opted to take a neutral, apolitical position
toward the Israeli occupation but to fully support the Israeli security
forces and policies toward the Palestinians, despite the serious
suspicions of crimes and atrocities hovering over them. Any who argue
either for or against an academic boycott against Israeli institutions,
we believe, should know and consider not only facts regarding the
situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), but also the
ways in which the Israeli academic institutions make political choices
and actively take sides in the ongoing conflict. This report
deals with relevant facts about the connections between Israeli
academic institutions and the occupation. It is doubtful that in the
process of researching this report all facts relevant to the subject
were uncovered, especially since some of the economic connections
between academic institutions and private companies are actively hidden
by the parties involved. The involvement of Israeli academic
institutions in the occupation takes many forms and scopes, and not all
Israeli academic institutions can be said to be involved on the same
scale. However, all main Israeli academic institutions are involved in
the occupation. Indeed, all major Israeli academic institutions,
certainly the ones with the strongest international connections, were
found to provide unquestionable support to Israelâs occupation. Some of
the details depicted in this report are evidence of blunt and direct
support to the occupation while others are more minor details, which,
nonetheless, provide a clear indication of the political stance taken
by academic institutions. It should be noted that the Israeli
security forces are the prime proponents of the occupation and
therefore any aid given to them is considered here as support for the
occupation. It is probable that universities in other countries may
also occasionally support the local security forces. However the
situation of the Israeli army is unlike that of other armies around the
world and no support given to the Israeli security agencies can be
defined as âneutral.âTo read the whole booklet, click here *.pdf. Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Electronic Intifada Palestinian students at Israeli universities support academic boycott Open letter, Abnaa el-Balad, Iqraa Student Association, National Democratic Assembly, 11 November 2009 11-11-2009The
following open letter to the Norwegian University of Science and
Technology in Trondheim was issued on 9 November 2009 by Arab students
at Israeli universities. The university's board is due to consider a
measure supporting the academic boycott of Israel: We are
Arab students at the Israeli universities writing to you in support of
the proposed academic boycott of Israeli academic institutions. We
believe that the boycott is timely and hopefully will help in upholding
moral values of fairness, justice and equality which have been sorely
missed in our region. While the reason for the boycott is
rightly what has been going on in the 1967 occupied territories [West
Bank and Gaza Strip], we propose another angle which affirms the need
for boycott, namely our daily experience as Arabs in Israeli
institutions. We are the lucky ones who have been able to pursue our
studies in institutions of higher education, to which we arrived
against great odds. Only very few among our generation have been
qualified to attend universities due to the state's discriminatory
policies. Our schools mostly lack the basic facilities needed for
education, and the curriculum is structured to serve the state's goal
in socializing the pupils for self-estrangement. It contains very
little, if any at all, on our history and culture. Additionally, it
aims to erase our historical memory and promote the official policy
line of divide and rule. In short, it is modeled on curriculums that
dark regimes, like apartheid South Africa, have used to indoctrinate
rather than educate. We arrive to universities with this "educational"
baggage. The idea that Israeli universities adhere to the values
of free academic institutions, where academic freedom, objectivity and
meritocracy prevail, is widely accepted in the West. From our
experience we attest -- and indeed prove beyond doubt -- that this is
not the case. In recent years Israeli universities have changed the
criteria of acceptance to various faculties in order -- as a certain
president of an Israeli university put it -- to prevent large number of
undesirable (i.e. Arab) students from attending prestigious faculties
such as medicine and natural sciences. Moreover, lecturers who
presented findings which are at odds with the official ideology -- such
as Ilan Pappe and Neve Gordon -- are bullied and harassed or forced to
resign. Meanwhile raw racist statements by many lecturers are
considered by the administrations of the universities as benign or even
objective statements. For example, recently Dr. Dan Scheuftan stated in
one of his lectures: "The Arabs are the biggest failure in the history
of the human race ... there's nothing under the sun that's more screwed
up than the Palestinians;" "Throughout the Arab world, people fire guns
at weddings in order to prove that they have at least one thing that's
hard and in working order that can shoot." It goes without
saying that none of these lecturers has ever been disciplined.
Moreover, foreign students are warned by the security authorities of
Haifa University not to visit Arab villages or towns. Although
some Israeli universities -- such as the University of Haifa -- pride
themselves on promoting "co-existence," nothing is further from the
truth than this. We are prevented from forming our [own] (i.e. Arab)
students union, and racial discrimination against us -- under the
pretext of not serving in the army -- is widely practiced in the
granting of scholarships, as well as in the provision of housing at the
universities' residential halls. This is particularly grave as the
universities are located in Jewish towns, and Arab students face many
obstacles and hardships in finding appropriate housing due to
prevailing prejudices and anti-Arab sentiments in Israeli society. Yet,
the restrictions imposed on our freedom of expression are more
stifling. We are not allowed to express our collective sentiments or
ideas publicly. It is quite often that our public gatherings are not
only violently interrupted by extreme right-wing Jewish students, but
also in various occasions the universities called on the police to
intervene. In several occasions, as during our peaceful demonstration
at Haifa University against the war on Gaza, the police sent in large
number of its special units which are infamous for their brutality.
Needless to say that they do the job they are trained for. Moreover,
the universities collaborate with the internal security services (the
feared Shin Bet) and provide them with names of the activists among the
students who are regularly summoned, investigated and threatened. In
the end, we are hopeful that you will take a decision which reaffirms
the true meaning of human values, and provide a proof that racism,
religious tribalism, obfuscation and disregard for human dignity are no
longer tolerated. Undersigned: Abnaa el-Balad - The Student Movement Iqraa Student Association - Islamic Movement National Democratic Assembly (NDA) - The Student MovementSource ---------------------------------------------------------------Occupation Magazine Israelis to Trondheim: Boycott the Israeli Academy Now! On
Thursday 12 November Trondheim University in Norway will vote on a
resolution proposal calling for institutional sanctions against the
Israeli acedemia. The right wing Israeli lobby is trying hard to stop
this initiative. Please send mail in support of the boycott proposal,
to University officials listed below. You can use the letter below,
sent by the Israeli BDS support group, or send your own letter. BOYCOTT! Supporting the Palestinian BDS call from withinhttp://www.boycottisrael.info/ Boycott the Israeli Academy Now! - Open Letter from Israeli Citizens to the Board of Governors of Trondheim University Dear Trondheim University Officials, We,
Israeli citizens, activists and supporters of BOYCOTT! Supporting the
Palestinian BDS call from within, an Israeli group in support of
boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel, applaud faculty
members at the University of Trondheim and University College of
Sרr-Trרndelag in Norway for their principled support for the cause of
justice in Palestine by proposing a motion to boycott Israeli
universities. We support this historic step in the direction of
applying effective pressure on Israel and holding it accountable for
its occupation and apartheid policies, which violate international law
and fundamental human rights. We urge the Board of Governors
of the University of Trondheim and University College of Sרr-Trרndelag
to declare at their upcoming meeting that Israeli universities and
academic institutions cannot be normal partners of any self-respecting
Norwegian institution. Indeed, it has to be recognized by academics the
world over that Israeli universities are part and parcel of the
structures of domination and oppression of the Palestinian people. They
have played a direct and indirect role in promoting, justifying,
developing or supporting the stateâs racist policies and persistent
violations of human rights and international law. Most recently, and
only as an example, a Tel Aviv University publication announced with
pride that the Research & Development Directorate of the Israeli
Ministry of Defense is currently funding 55 projects at the university;
it went on to quote the head of the Security Studies Program at the
University that âmilitary R&D in Israel would not exist without the
universities. They carry out all the basic scientific investigation,
which is then developed either by the defence industries or the army.
It should be noted that this is the same Ministry of Defense that
executed the relentless and bloody war against the Palestinians in Gaza
last December and January, killing,sometimes murdering, over 1400
Palestinians, more than 300 of whom were children, and wounding over
5000 people. Many neighborhoods were reduced to rubble, and educational
institutions were destroyed. In general, the Israeli academy sees
nothing wrong with partnering with the Israeli military machine. As
Israeli citizens, we strongly believe that the impunity of Israel must
be challenged. Academic and cultural boycotts are effective measures
available to world civil society to indicate its intolerance of
oppression and as a means to bear pressure upon Israel to cease its
campaign of violent colonial control over the Palestinian people. We
support PACBI`s call for boycott in 2004 of Israeli academic and
cultural institutions, like the Palestinian civil societyâs widely
endorsed call for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) in 2005.
These calls are based on the same moral principle embodied in the
international civil society campaign against the apartheid regime in
South Africa: that people of conscience must take a stand against
oppression and use all the means of civil resistance available to bring
it to an end. We urge the Board of Governors to pass the boycott motion in its meeting on November 12, 2009, and to join the growing global movement for justice for the Palestinian people. Sincerely, ______________ ______________ Israeli CitizenLinks to the latest articles in this section British activists kick off week-long boycott against Israeli settlement products Israelis to Trondheim: Boycott the Israeli Academy Now! Petition - talk to Hamas! Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Jews sans frontieres Students "bully" Israel's plucky ambassador to the UK 8-11-2009Since
I've been working, quick JSF has made my blogging a lot easier. See
this Ynet report on how students in the UK wanted to place Israel's
ambassador to the UK, Ron Prossor, under citizen's arrest. It's headed
Students bully Britain envoy:
Protestors at the University of Nottingham prepared a rude welcome for
Israel's Ambassador to England, Ron Prosor, welcoming him with
anti-Israel signs and interrupting his speech. Hours before
the visit, British police learned that students at the university
intend to place the Israeli envoy under citizen's arrest. Prosor's
lecture on Israel's peace efforts was delayed, as a heavy police guard
escorted him into the lecture site through a back door. The
lecture itself was accompanied by the shouting of charges and
accusations against the State of Israel. During the event, students cut
off Prosor on several occasions and some caused other disturbances.
Despite the interruptions, the Israeli ambassador completed his
lecture, before leaving the site in a secured vehicle accompanied by
local security forces. Fearing for his safety, local police resorted to
a deceptive ploy, leading Prosor through one entrance while protestors
waited at a different exit. The envoy later said that the
events at University of Nottingham are "yet another manifestation of
the ugly smear campaign being managed against Israel on campuses across
Britain." "It's regrettable to see important academic
institutions becoming hostages in the hands of radicals, who seek to
silence any civilized discussion," he said. "We will fight with all
means available to us against academic boycotts, economic boycotts, and
diplomatic-legal boycotts." Meanwhile, Minister Daniel
Hershkowitz faced a similar experience while visiting Erasmus
University in Holland. Protestors who attempted to disrupt the
minister's address were removed from the site. The news just gets better and better. Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Ha'aretz Norwegian official: Schools considering Israel boycott By Cnaan Liphshiz 9-11-2009A Norwegian university's controversial vote on boycotting Israel is part of a nationwide campaign that may bring additional boycott votes at other Norwegian universities, said a representative on the board of executives at the University of Tromso. Hundreds of scholars from Israel and elsewhere have signed a petition condemning the vote at the University of Trondheim, scheduled for November 12. If
the initiative passes, Trondheim, also known as the Norwegian
University of Science and Technology (NTNU), could become the first
Western university to boycott Israel. A representative of the executive board at the University of Tromso said pro-Palestinian activists are trying to call a vote on boycotting Israel there as well. "A
group of people have petitioned the board to hold a vote on this in the
coming weeks, but no decision has been made yet," said the board representative,
who spoke on condition of anonymity. He added there was "a national
effort" to have Norwegian universities boycott Israel, and that the
Norwegian boycott proponents were acting in unison with their American
and British peers. The petition condemning the Trondheim boycott
initiative bears the signatures of more than 900 scholars, including
Nobel laureates. It states that they "refute and condemn the campaign
to boycott Israeli academics" and academic institutions. "We
stand in solidarity with Israeli academics and academic institutions;
if you boycott them, boycott us as well," states the petition,
co-signed by Nobel laureates Kenneth J. Arrow from Stanford University,
Aaron Ciechanover from the Technion Israel Institute of Technology,
Roald Hoffmann of Cornell University and Claude Cohen-Tannoudji of the
Ecole Normale Superieure. Parliamentarian Hans Olav Syversen
from the Christian Democrat Party said NTNU was "turning itself into a
laughingstock" by holding the vote. An NTNU spokesman said that the
institution will hold the vote, but that the exact agenda for the vote
has not been set yet.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------PIC Stranded students in Gaza appeal for solution
8-11-2009GAZA
-- Palestinian students stranded in the Gaza Strip who could not travel
via the Rafah border crossing with Egypt to follow up their studies
abroad have called on the media to shed light on their plight. The
students appealed in a statement on Friday to all government
institutions, the media and human rights groups to consider their just
case and to highlight it before the local and international public
opinion. They said that many of them were either deprived of
their right to study in the current semester in many universities or
lost the entire academic year in others.Source --------------------------------------------------------------- Birzeit University - Palestine PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY See also article here
31-10-200921 year old Berlanty Azzam was detained at a military checkpoint, blindfolded and then deported to Gaza on Monday 2nd November. Azzam
had been returning to Bethlehem after attending a job interview in
Ramallah when she was detained on account of her Gaza-registeted ID.
Whilst being held at the checkpoint, Azzam was told by soldiers that
she would be taken to a detention facility until a petition to the
Supreme Court by human rights organisation Gisha was resolved. Despite
such promises, Azzam was blindfolded, handcuffed and loaded into a
military jeep, only to find herself left in Gaza late last night. The
military refuses to let her return to the West Bank. Born in Gaza,
Azzam has lived in Bethlehem since 2005, after being awarded an exit
visa and a scholarship to study Business Administration at Bethlehem
University. A second Gaza resident who was travelling in the same car
as Azzam was also arrested and remains in detention. Israel's
military released a statement to the US news network CNN saying Azzam
was "residing illegally" in the West Bank. Israel bans Palestinian
residents of Gaza from studying at Palestinian universities in the West
Bank, denying individuals such as Azzam the right to remain in the West
Bank. Her deportation comes at a time of increased efforts by the
Israeli military to forcibly remove Palestinians with ID cards that are
registered in Gaza from the West Bank. In 2000 there were 350
Gaza students at Birzeit University, many were deported, others stayed
in the West Bank 'illegally' and risk being deported at any moment. By
2005 there were only 35 Gaza students in Birzeit. Today there are none. The
R2E Campaign strongly condemns the treatment that Azzam has received at
the hands of the Israeli forces. Her deportation, simply for attempting
to pursue her education in her home country, constitutes a severe
violation of academic freedom. We call on all our supporters to contact
their local government representatives, Israeli embassies and the
Israeli Ministry for the Interior to protest the denial of Berlanty,
and all students from Gaza, the Right to Study in the West Bank. We
also call on our supporters to contact their local government
representatives to demand a stronger stand from their governments on
the issue of Palestinian right to education. Please see the following contacts below: Ehud Barak Minister of Defence, Ministry of Defence, 37 Kaplan Street, Hakirya, Tel Aviv 61909, Israel Fax: 00 972 3 691 6940 Email: minister@mod.gov.il COPIES TO: Yuli Tamir (Ms) Minister of Education, Ministry of Education , PO Box 292, 34 Shivtei Israel, Jerusalem 91911, Israel Fax: 00 972 2 560 2223 Email: ytamir@knesset.gov.ilPLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY Urgent Appeals INDEX What's new on this site? Studies & Research: R2E Fact Sheet (30 April 2009) Urgent Appeals: Open letter to international academic institutions from the R2E Campaign (17 January 2009) Studies & Research: Report on Israeli police/ Military Escort of school children to and from At-Tuwani ( 4 November 2009) Urgent Appeals: Urgent Call for Action: Gazan Student Deported. Support Right to Study (31 October 2009) Activism News: Palestinian Elected as Honorary President of LSE Students' Union (30 October 2009) Activism News: Norway university to vote next month on boycott of Israel (30 October 2009) In The Media: Petition filed to overturn student's Gaza deportation (30 October 2009)Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Al Arabiya Norway university to mull academic boycott of Israel
The letter criticized Israel for its assault of Gaza that inflicted "immense human suffering" that shocked the world Mona Moussly 3-11-2009DUBAI
- A group of professors in Norway have called for a boycott of Israeli
academics because of "systematic" discrimination against Palestinian
students and for altering history to develop the Zionist ideology, the
professors said in their proposal sent to Al Arabiya on Tuesday. The
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), where the
professors work, is set to decide next week whether to boycott Israel
after it received the proposal from 30 of its professors who said their
aim was to put "pressure" on Israel to end its occupation of
Palestinian land."
Historians and archaeologists are important in the development of the
Zionist ideology and renouncement of Palestinian history and identity. " Open letter reads "We,
who have signed this letter, believe that it is time that academic
institutions contributed to an international pressure against Israel so
that real negotiations between Israel, democratically elected
Palestinian authorities and the international society can begin," the
open letter said. The group accused Israeli universities and
institutions of higher education of playing "a key role in the policy
of oppression" and said "historians and archaeologists are important in
the development of the Zionist ideology and renouncement of Palestinian
history and identity." The letter cited Israel's 22-day land,
air and sea assault of Gaza as an example of Tel Aviv's actions that
inflict "immense human suffering," which they said "shocked the world."Academic freedom " Israeli universities and other institutions of higher education have played a key role in the policy of oppression. " Open letter The
letter also blasted Israeli institutions for "systematically"
discriminating against Palestinian staff and students, which they said
showed Israel had no regard for "the ideals of open universities and
academic freedom." The group called for the boycott to "cover
the educational, research and culture institutions of the state of
Israel and their representatives, regardless of religion or
nationality" and said they hoped it would continue "until guarantees
are issued that the occupation of Palestinian land will be terminated." The
board of directors at NTNU, Norway's second largest university located
in the western town of Trondheim, has agreed to consider the motion,
Anne Katherine Dahl, an advisor to the president of NTNU, told Al
Arabiya. "From NTNU there will be no further comment until the board has concluded on November 12th," Dahl said. The
board is composed of 11 members: four representatives of the state,
four from the university staff, two student representatives and one
from the temporary staff. To read the english version of the open letter to NTNU Click Here Source --------------------------------------------------------------- Ma'anUK student union boycotts Israeli goods 3-11-2009Bethlehem
- Following a landmark referendum, students at the UK's Sussex
University in Brighton this week voted to boycott Israeli goods. The
decision comes in line with the international Boycott, Divestment and
Sanctions (BDS) campaign, which calls upon Israel to respect
international law and end the occupation of Palestinian territory. The
referendum received messages of support and thanks from Jewish and
Israeli academics and non-governmental organizations that oppose
Israel's occupation. Author and scholar Norman G. Finkelstein described
the referendum result as "a victory, not for Palestinians but for truth
and justice." According to Iyad Burnat, head of the Popular
Committee Against the Wall in Bil'in, "We hope even more people all
around the world will follow by our example so that we can put an end
to the Israeli occupation and dismantle the apartheid wall."Source ---------------------------------------------------------------PNN Sussex University Students' Union first in United Kingdom to boycott Israeli goods 1-11-2009Following a landmark referendum, students at Sussex University have voted to boycott Israeli goods. The
decision will become part of the international Boycott, Divestment and
Sanctions campaign, which calls upon the Israelis to respect
international law and end the occupation of Palestine. Besides
being penned and assisted by Palestinian, Arabs and international
supporters, the referendum received messages of support and thanks from
Jewish and Israeli academics and non-governmental organizations that
oppose the Israeli policy of occupation in Palestine. Author and
scholar Norman G. Finkelstein described the referendum result as âa
victory, not for Palestinians but for truth and justice.â Head
of Popular Committee against the Wall and-co-founder of Friends for
Freedom and Justice in Bilâin, Iyad Burnat issued a brief statement of
encouragement: âThe Committee really appreciates Sussex
Students' Union remarkable idea of starting a boycott of Israeli goods.
We hope even more people all around the world will follow the example
so that we can put an end to the Israeli occupation and dismantle the
apartheid Wall.â The western Ramallah town of Bilâin is one of
many that hold weekly demonstrations against the Wall and settlements.
Bilâin also hosts an annual nonviolence conference. The Sussux Studentsâ Union is the first student union in the UK to boycott Israeli goods.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Al Manar Norway University to Vote Next Month on Boycott of Israel 30-10-2009 30-10-2009 The
University of Trondheim in Norway may become the first university in
the West to adopt an academic boycott of Israel, if a majority of its
board votes in favor of the move at a meeting on the subject next month. Three
days prior to the November 12 vote by the board of the Norwegian
University of Science and Technology (NTNU), the institution will host
a lecture on Israel's use of anti-Semitism as a political tool. The
lecture, by Prof. Moshe Zuckermann of Tel Aviv University, is part of a
controversial six-session seminar on âIsraelâ that is comprised
entirely of Norwegians and Israelis known for highly critical attitudes
toward Israel. Prof. Morten Levin, an NTNU lecturer and member
of the seminar's organizing committee, set up the series of lectures -
which also featured Ilan Pappe and Stephen Walt - with Ann Rudinow
Saetnan and Rune Skarstein. All have signed a call for an academic
boycott of Israel. In a letter this week to Norwegian Prime
Minister Jens Stoltenberg, the Simon Wiesenthal Center's director for
international relations, Shimon Samuels, called the seminar "a new
stage in Norwegian incitement to Jew-hatred" and "outrageously
anti-Israel bigotry." According to a scientist working at NTNU
who spoke to Haaretz on condition of anonymity, the idea of holding a
vote on boycotting Israel was modeled on the campaign run by Sue
Blackwell, a leading proponent of an academic boycott of Israel in the
United Kingdom. A group of pro-Israel employees of NTNU are currently
looking for ways to prevent the boycott from being adopted, drawing on
the legal reasoning that in 2007 prompted Britain's University and
College Union - of which Blackwell is a prominent member - to nix plans
for a boycott of Israel. According to people who fought the
U.K. boycott motion, it was dropped after legal consultants told UCU
officials that a boycott of Israel would violate anti-discrimination
laws. "We have to see how similar the laws in Norway are," the
Trondheim scientist said. "If this were the U.K., [a boycott]
would be illegal. But this is Norway, where these things may fly," said
Manfred Gerstenfeld, chairman of the Jerusalem Center for Public
Affairs, who has published a book on anti-Semitism and anti-Israelism
in the Nordic countries.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Anna in Palestine For
anyone who doesn't know this, last Spring, Hampshire College became the
first US college to divest from the Israeli occupationâ33 years after
they became the first US college to divest from Apartheid South Africa!
Times are changing and we all have much to learn from Hampshire folks. Therefore,I
am excited to announce the 2009 National Campus Boycott,
Divestment,Sanctions Conference, taking place Nov20th - Nov 22nd at
Hampshire College in Amherst,Massachusetts. Find out more and register
at: http://www.hsjp.org/2009/09/21/CampusBDS/ See below here Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Students For Justice In Palestine a Hampshire student group 09:53 PMAnnouncing the 2009 Campus Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Conference at Hampshire College National Campus Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions Conference endorsed by the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of IsraelWhat & Where:
This fall from November 20th through the 22nd, students, faculty, and
staff from around the country who are engaged in Palestine solidarity
activism will converge for a conference on campus Boycott, Divestment,
and Sanctions (BDS). This conference has three key goals: 1) To co-educate and share resources amongst campus organizers on the process of initiating BDS campaigns on campuses 2) To strategize tactics to address the needs of different campuses in carrying out BDS campaigns 3)
To bring together Palestine-solidarity campus groups that have or have
not met under a larger network in order to strive towards a coordinated
national BDS campaign. There have been many BDS conferences
around the country, but rarely have they focused exclusively on the
campus movement. This conference therefore presents an exceptional and
important opportunity for this movement.Why: In July of
2005, âa clear majority of Palestinian civil society called upon
international civil society organizations and people of conscience all
over the world to impose broad boycotts and implement divestment
initiatives against Israel, similar to those applied to South Africa in
the apartheid era, until Israel meets its obligation to recognize the
Palestinian people's inalienable right to self-determination and fully
complies with international law.â* In addition, BDS is a non-violent
means of protest and action that campuses in the United States can
directly engage in to effectively stand in solidarity with the
Palestinian people. A similar strategy was adopted in the struggle to
end apartheid in South Africa in the 1970âs and 1980âs, and campus
groups played a large role in helping spark and maintain that
successful movement. As campus members in the United States, we
are directly complicit in perpetuating the injustices committed against
the Palestinian people â our schoolsâ money is invested in companies
that directly profit from Israelâs militarism, annexation of
Palestinian land, and apartheid practices. After sixty-years of
displacement, over forty-years of occupation, a two-year old siege, and
in light of the recent invasion of Gaza and the continuing expansion of
settlements in the West Bank, we must act now to cultivate the BDS
movement in the United States. As members of academic communities, we
can engage BDS as a means of applying economic and public pressure on
Israel to abide by international law and we can change the discourse
around Palestine/Israel in this country.How to Participate:
Attend the National Campus BDS conference at Hampshire College in
Amherst, MA along with other members of your campus group. You will
have the opportunity to organize workshops and panels, engage in
discussions led by peers, listen to panels and lectures by influential
members of the movement, develop skills, share resources, explore
strategies, build networks, and more. Workshops at this conference will
have a particular focus on: education and campus outreach, movement
building strategies, and utilizing publicity and media for BDS. We
encourage both Palestine-solidarity and allied groups to attend and
contribute to this important conference through general participation,
the building of a larger organizing network, and the facilitation of
workshops. (In order to facilitate a workshop, please see the âWorkshop
Proposal Submission Formâ at the end of this post.) Prominent
public figures and outspoken supporters of the BDS movement will be
attending the conference as keynote speakers and panelists, including
representatives of the BNC and PACBI.Dates and Times: Friday, November 20th at 6 PM through Sunday, November 22nd , at 9 PM.Hosted By:
Hampshire College Students for Justice in Palestine and allied groups,
and endorsed by various Palestine Solidarity organizations. Please continue to check our website www.hsjp.org , where we will announce updates, lodging/food information, financial aid, and a place for registration for the conference. Please forward this to other Palestine solidarity activists and mark the date! See you at Hampshire! Toward a free Palestine, Hampshire College SJPhampshiresjp@gmail.com Workshop Proposal Submission Form Although
Hampshire College Students for Justice in Palestine is organizing the
logistics and providing the spaces for the 2009 National Campus BDS
Conference, most of the content of the conference will come from other
attending activists with campus organizing experience. If you
wish to organize and facilitate a workshop or panel at the National
Campus Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Conference at Hampshire
College in November of 2009, please complete the following workshop
proposal form and submit it to BDSconference2009@gmail.com
by no later than October 12th, 2009. Please only complete this process
if you are certain you would like to organize and facilitate a
workshop. Following the approval of your workshop by October 19th, you
will be e-mailed a confirmation letter. In order to submit a
proposal, please answer each of the numbers below in a document. Before
each answer, include the question number and the question itself. Save
the document as the following: (Your Name) â BDS Workshop Proposal, and
save it as a .doc, .rtf, or .odt file.Please note: This
conference is aimed at individuals and groups who already have an
understanding of the situation in Palestine. Therefore, such workshop
proposals as âPalestine 101â are discouraged. However, workshops that
could replace âPalestine 101â include â âTeaching Palestine 101â or
âPalestine 201: Organizing around Resource Politics in Palestine.â
(Primary emphasis should be related to campus organizing and BDS
strategies).Workshop/Panel Descriptions: For this
conference, panels are defined as educational presentations that are
led by two or more individuals, with time for follow up questions from
the audience. Workshops will be organized as interactive sessions,
including skill-shares, skill-building exercises, dialogue
opportunities, networking, debate spaces, educational activities, and
more.Workshop/Panel Proposal Questions - Workshop/Panel Facilitator Information 1. Name of your organization, if applicable: 2. Name of your college, university, or school: 3. Name of primary facilitator and contact information (e-mail, phone number. Can be contacted for clarifying questions): 4. Name of other potential facilitators, affiliated organizations (if applicable), and e-mails: Workshop/Panel Information 5. Title: 6. One Sentence Introduction to workshop/panel Subject: 7. Description of workshop/panel (4-12 sentences): 8. Objectives (tools and/or knowledge participants will come away with): 9. Format (panel, presentation, discussion, activity, etc.):Other 10.
What A/V or other special equipment will you need? Will you need us to
provide it or will you be able to? If you are able to, may other groups
use your equipment?: 11. Do any of the presenters or facilitators have any scheduling constraints?: 12. Any other information that you feel is important to include: * "What is the Call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)? |." Global BDS Movement. 15 June 2009. <http://bdsmovement.net/?q=node/159 >.Source ---------------------------------------------------------------Al Jazeera Olmert faces tough crowdBy Teymoor Nabili in Photo by Getty Images While
those critical of Iran were given front row seats when President
Ahmedinejad visited Columbia University, critics of Ehud Olmert were
ushered from the hall when he spoke to students at Chicago University
this week. 21-10-2009When President Ahmadinejad of Iran spoke
to students at Columbia University in September 2007, the students, the
faculty and the media were all given front row seats to condemn and to
vilify. Even the President of the University, Lee Bollinger, took the opportunty to get a dig in, telling Ahmadinejad:"âMr. President, you exhibit all the signs of a petty and cruel dictatorâ The New York Times reported:"Mr.
Bollinger praised himself and Columbia for showing they believed in
freedom of speech by inviting the Iranian president, then continued his
attack." The entire event generated reams of press coverage. Contrast this with the experience faced by Ehud Olmert when he spoke to students at Chicago University this week. In
a letter to students, the university expressly forbade any video or
audio recording equipment, barred members of the media from attending,
told students they needed to be there 2 hours before the speech for
security screening, and stipulated that questions should be
pre-submitted, presumably also for screening. The university ended the letter with the somewhat ironic comment::"we appreciate your co-operation with our efforts to to ensure open discourse and freedom of expression." Despite
these efforts, a small group of students did protest, inside and
outside the lecture hall, condeming Olmert's decision to attack Gaza
and demanding that he respond to the Goldstone report. But where
critics of Ahmadinejad had been encouraged - and given every
opportunity - to attack, critics of Olmert were ushered from the hall. The New York Times and the mainstream US media didn't see fit to cover the event. However, the Electronic Intifada did, and even managed to sneak in a camera:Source -------Electronic Intifada EI exclusive video: Protesters shout down Ehud Olmert in Chicago Maureen Clare Murphy 16-10-2009Approximately
30 activists -- mainly students from area universities -- disrupted a
lecture given in Chicago by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
yesterday which was hosted by the University of Chicago's Harris School
of Public Policy. While Olmert's speech was disrupted inside the
lecture hall, approximately 150 activists protested outside the hall in
the freezing rain. Protesters inside the hall read off the
names of Palestinian children killed during Israel's assault on Gaza
last winter. They shouted that it was unacceptable that the war crimes
suspect be invited to speak at a Chicago university when his army
destroyed a university in Gaza in January. They reminded the audience
of the more than 1,400 Palestinians killed during the Gaza attacks and
the more than 1,200 killed during Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 2006.
Both invasions happened during Olmert's premiership. With
interventions coming every few minutes throughout his appearance,
Olmert had difficulty giving his speech and often appeared frustrated.
At one point he appealed for "just five minutes" to speak without being
interrupted. The demonstration was mobilized last week after
organizers learned of the lecture, paid for by a grant provided by
Jordan's King Abdullah II. Within hours an appeal was issued, urging
those concerned with Palestinian rights to call the university and
demand that the lecture be canceled. The call was put out by major
community organizations such as the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination
Committee (ADC)-Chicago, American Muslims for Palestine and the United
States Palestine Community Network, as well as solidarity organizations
al-Awda, the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network, the
International Solidarity Movement, the Palestine Solidarity
Group-Chicago and area campus groups such as Students for Justice in
Palestine chapters at DePaul University and the University of Illinois
at Chicago, as well as the Arab Student Union at Moraine Valley. The
security presence at the lecture was severe with university police, the
US Secret Service and Israeli security present -- many of them visibly
armed -- with Israeli security checking in those who had registered in
advance to attend the lecture. Video and photography was banned inside
the hall and media were not allowed to cover the lecture. Despite these
restrictions, activists managed to take video inside the hall and drop
an eight-foot-long banner from the mezzanine that read "Goldstone" in
both English and Hebrew, referring to the recently published UN report
investigating violations of international law during the Gaza invasion.
One activist was arrested and put in a headlock by a police officer,
witnesses said, and released around midnight. Approximately 30
supporters waited for him at the police station while he was detained. Towards
the end of the lecture, Olmert put his hand over his brow and squinted
to search out the source of the shout, "There's no discussion with a
war criminal -- the only discussion you should be having is in court!"
That call was made by Ream Qato, who graduated from the university in
2007, and added, "You belong in the Hague!" Qato told The Electronic
Intifada that yesterday's protest "Set the stage for University of
Chicago students and students in the Chicago area ... no one should be
afraid of speaking out against someone." She added that the
demonstration was significant because "The Palestinian community [in
Chicago] for the first time went to a university campus to protest."
Approximately
150 protesters demonstrated outside the University of Chicago hall
where former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was speaking. (Maureen
Clare Murphy) Second-year medical student Afshan
Mohiuddin was removed from the hall after she voiced her disapproval at
the Harris School dean's on-stage assertion that Olmert was invited to
express his views. "He can do that at the International Court of
Justice, not at this university," Mohiuddin shouted, adding, "[Olmert]
belongs in a cage, not on a stage!" Mohiuddin told The
Electronic Intifada that "it was ironic that they searched us [instead
of him]," considering that Olmert is suspected of war crimes. She
added, "As a University of Chicago student I was upset with the lack of
commotion on behalf of the student body before the event ... No one has
protested the event." Mohiuddin's frustration was echoed in a commentary published by the University of Chicago's student publication The Chicago Maroon
earlier this week, in which third-year student Nadia Marie Ismail
decried the lack of protest by the university community towards the
Olmert speech. She contrasted this silence with the pressure the Center
for Middle Eastern Studies faced after a lecture earlier this year by
The Electronic Intifada's Ali Abunimah (who was the first to disrupt
Olmert's speech yesterday), University of Chicago professor John
Mearsheimer and Norman Finkelstein, whose lost bid for tenure at DePaul
University is attributed to outside pressure by Israel government
apologists. "[T]hat University center was put under unprecedented
pressure for weeks before and months after the event, with claims that
University centers and schools should not host 'one-sided' speakers,"
Ismail wrote. Olmert's lecture in Chicago was one of several
scheduled throughout the United States. His speech at the University of
Kentucky the previous day was disrupted by activists and met with a
protest outside. These demonstrations are part of a wave of notched-up
dissent towards Israeli officials implicated in war crimes and racist
policy. In 2003, former Israeli minister Natan Sharansky was greeted
with a pie in the face by an activist at Rutgers University in New
Jersey. Last year at the UK's Oxford University, a speech by Israeli
President Shimon Peres was drowned out by protesters outside while students inside the hall disrupted his talk . One
of the organizers of the protest, Hatem Abudayyeh, National
Coordinating Committee member of the United States Palestine Community
Network, hoped for a larger count of protesters despite the adverse
weather. However, he said, "The fact that there's people around the
world who know about it, the fact that PACBI [the Palestinian Campaign
for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel] sent us a letter of
support and endorsement of our action, the fact that there was
coordination with the outside protest and the inside disruption -- all
of these components and aspects of the action made it one of the more
successful ones that we've done." He added, "There is real
change happening, whether it's the international response to the
Lebanon war or the international response to the Gaza war. The US is
the most powerful country in the world, Israel is a powerful military
as well, but the Palestinians have the world on their side."Video shot and produced by The Electronic Intifada Maureen
Clare Murphy is Managing Editor of The Electronic Intifada and an
activist with the Palestine Solidarity Group-Chicago, which
co-sponsored the demonstration. Source ---------Norman Finkelstein Blog Embedded reporter (and former student) tells it like it was 20-10-2009 Dear Professor Finkelstein, When
we first heard that former Israeli PM Ehud Olmert was coming to the
University of Chicagoâs Harris School of Public Policy, about 30 of us
Palestinian activists (mainly students) RSVPâd. We arrived at
the event. They checked our names off and gave us pink wristbands to go
in. But once you were in, no re-entry was allowed. So we stayed in the
lobby and waited for other activists. We all gathered together and
planned out what would be an internal disruption. We were to each stand
up and say something to disrupt Olmertâs speech every 2 minutes or so.
Some of us would also be holding a banner from the balcony, facing
Olmert that said âGoldstone Reportâ to make him nervous during his
speech. While we were doing this, of course a protest would also be
held outside. Once we got into the lecture hall, it felt like a
checkpoint. An IDF soldier and U.S. secret service were everywhere.
After getting our items searched and going through a metal detector, we
were finally allowed in. We all spread around, some of us in the main
area and others on the balcony. It seemed as if the security had
Palestinian radar, as their eyes were on us the whole time. One young
Palestinian man who was wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh I believe, was
racially profiled. Because of his skin color and attire, he made some
members of the crowd a bit nervous, so the security warned him and his
friends who were sitting with him not to disrupt. Olmert comes
in to speak, and after literally 10 seconds from the beginning of his
speech, Ali Abunimah disrupts him, standing up and saying that a war
criminal should not have freedom of expression, and also expressed his
disappointment with his Alma Mater for inviting a murderer. He was
escorted out by the police. After that, approximately every
minute or two, someone else stood up and disrupted Olmertâs speech. One
student read off the names of people in Gaza that were killed at
Olmertâs hands. Others repeatedly mentioned he was a war criminal and
asserted that he had blood on his hands for the murders of 1,400
Palesitnians in Gaza, as well as 1,200 Lebanese. After each
person was escorted out by the police, cheering ensued. Olmert was
getting nervous or frustrated, as he kept laughing and smiling.
However, he began instigating the Palestinian crowd by saying more
extreme statements as the disruptions died down toward the end. It
seemed as if he WANTED more interruptions. Perhaps he anticipated
disruptions and didnât write a speech. He kept talking about how Israel
had been terrorized for 60 years, and is merely trying to defend
herself. He also mentioned that Israel is and always will be a Jewish
nation. According to Olmert, Jerusalem has always been fully Jewish,
and if you dig under the Temple Mount, no history of Palesitnians can
be found. This made us activists even more angry. During the
lecture, a young male student stood up and interrupted (as usual, no
different from any others). A police officer, who WAS NOT wearing a
uniform, just regular attire, comes up and grabs him! From where I was
sitting, it looked like he was choking the boy. Another member of the
crowd, who was this boyâs good friend, got up to defend him and tried
to push the man off him, not knowing it was a police officer. Another
police officer, in uniform, arrested him.The police officers at the
event were generally very unfair and harsh on the Palestinian
activists. The Zionists in the audience were also getting increasingly
hostile, one of them throwing a book at our activists. I was one
of the last to disrupt. After my shout I was escorted out by a police
officer. On the way out, I said shalom to the IDF soldier and joined
the crowd outside protesting. I believe that Thursday was a huge
success for us. Olmert didnât get to speak. About 30 of us stood up and
interrupted him throughout his speech. He was constantly getting
disrupted. As one of our disrupters said, a war criminal should never
be allowed to speak unless itâs in front of an international court. Iâm
proud of the Chicago activist community for having the courage to look
Olmert in the eye and tell him exactly what we feel. A friend in
Gaza contacted me and told me they heard what we did, and that people
in Gaza were so proud of us in Chicago. It made me proud of what we
did, and it was a historical day I will never forget. But Olmert is
still on a speaking tour across America. His next stop: San Francisco.
I hope the activists there come out strong and refuse to let him speak
as well. As one the students who disrupted said, âJustice will be
served.â Dr. Finkelstein, I wish you were there. But no worries, you were there with us in spirit. Sincerely, your former student, S.D. Source see also here and here ---------------------------------------------------------------Stop the Wall 'Study in Israel' billboards modified by guerilla advertisers 14-6-200910
bus shelter billboards advertising the University of Californiaâs
âStudy in Israelâ campaign were remade into âBoycott Israelâ ads and
placed around Berkeley and San Francisco in May. Under the
headline, âBoycott Israel? We boycott Israel becauseâŚâ, one of the
modified posters depicts students saying, âI believe in speaking out
against racism. Israelâs entrenched system of racial discrimination
& segregation against the Palestinian citizens of Israel is
frighteningly similar to the former apartheid system in South Africa!â
and âI believe that governments must be held accountable for their
actions! Israel denies its responsibility for the waves of ethnic
cleansing that have made millions of Palestinians into refugees.â The
original ad campaign was financed by the pro-Israel publicity agency
BlueStar PR as part of an intensive campaign to promote study in Israel
at California universities. The University of California recently
reinstated its study abroad program at the Hebrew University in
Jerusalem, after years of lobbying from pro-Israel students and
professionals. The posters ask members of the University of
California community to pressure U.C. to respect the cultural and
academic boycott initiated by Palestinian civil society in April 2004.
Above: Prior to modification.
Above:
âI believe that governments must be held accountable for their actions!
Israel denies its responsibility for the waves of ethnic cleansing that
have made millions of Palestinians into refugees.â
Above: Prior to modification.
Above:
âI believe in speaking out against racism. Israelâs entrenched system
of racial discrimination & segregation against the Palestinian
citizens of Israel is frighteningly similar to the former apartheid
system in South Africa!â For more photos, click here . source ---------------------------------------------------------------Boycott Divestment and sanctions for Palestine Palestinian Students in Gaza Launch Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel A Call from Palestine Palestinian Studentsâ Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel (PSCABI) 29-5-2009"Gaza today has become the test of our indispensable morality and common humanity." Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) National Committee, 27 December 2008 Statement The
Palestinian Studentsâ Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel
(PSCABI) calls upon freedom-loving students all over the world to stand
in solidarity with us by boycotting Israeli academic institutions for
their complicity in perpetuating Israel's illegal military occupation
and apartheid system. We note the historic action taken by thousands of
courageous students of British and American universities in occupying
their campuses in a show of solidarity with the brutally oppressed
Palestinian people in Gaza. We also deeply appreciate the decision by
Hampshire College to divest from companies profiting from the Israeli
occupation. Such pressure on Israel is the most likely to contribute to
ending its denial of our rights, including the right to education. In
this regard, we fully endorse the call for boycott issued by the
Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel,
PACBI, in 2004.[i] We emphasize our endorsement of the BDS call issued by more than 170 Palestinian civil society organizations in July 2005.[ii] We
also support the Call from Gaza issued by a group of civil society
organizations in the second week of the Gaza Massacre (Gaza 2009).[iii] Our
goal, as students, is to play a role in promoting the global BDS
movement which has gained an unprecedented momentum as a result of the
latest genocidal war launched by Israel against the occupied and
besieged Gaza Strip. We address our fellow students to take whatever
step possible, however small, to stand up for justice, international
law and the inalienable rights of the indigenous people of Palestine by
applying effective and sustainable pressure on Israel, particularly in
the form of BDS, to help put an end to its colonial and racist regime
over the Palestinians. We strongly urge our fellow university students all over the world to: (1) Support all the efforts aimed at boycotting Israeli academic institutions; (2)
Pressure university administrations to divest from Israel and from
companies directly or indirectly supporting the Israeli occupation and
apartheid policies; (3) Promote student union resolutions
condemning Israeli violations of international law and human rights and
endorsing BDS in any form; (4) Support the Palestinian student movement directly. To
break the medieval and barbaric Israeli siege of Gaza, people of
conscience need to move with a sense of urgency and purpose. Israel
must be compelled to pay a heavy price for its war crimes and crimes
against humanity through the intensification of the boycott against it
and against institutions and corporations complicit in its crimes. As
in the anti-apartheid struggle in solidarity with the black majority in
South Africa, students concerned about justice and sustainable peace
have a moral duty to support our boycott efforts. The Palestinian Studentsâ Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel (PSCABI) Endorsed by: * Progressive Student Union Block; * Fateh Youth Organization; * Progressive Student Labor Front; * Islamic Block; * Islamic League of Palestinian Students; * Student Unity Block; * Students Affairs (University of Palestine). [i] http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=869 [ii] http://www.bdsmovement.net/?q=node/52 [iii] http://www.odsg.org/co/index.php/component/content/article/1100-a-call-f... source ---------------------------------------------------------------Bernama.com Islamic University Of Gaza Appeals For Aid 5-6-2009KUALA
LUMPUR -- The board of trustees of the Islamic University of Gaza where
two buildings were destroyed in an aerial attack by the Zionist regime
last December has appealed for aid from Malaysians for reconstruction . Board director Dr Jamal Naji El-Khoudary said US$15 billion was needed to rebuild the two buildings. He
spoke to reporters after a news conference, held in conjunction with
the commemoration of the "An-Naksah" (1967 War), organised by the
Palestine Centre of Excellence (PACE) at the headquarters of the Jamaah
Islah Malaysia (JIM), here. PACE director Assoc Prof Dr Hafizi
Mohd Noor said the people could send their donations through the
Maybank account 562209608847 in the name of "Pertubuhan Jamaah Islah
Malaysia" or contact the JIM headquarters at 03-4108 9669. He
also said that the people of the world should remember the An-Naksah or
defeat in the Six-Day War in the process to establish peace in
Palestine. "The struggle to free Palestine, especially the
Al-Aqsa Mosque, belongs not only to the people of Palestine but is the
responsibility of all Muslims, in fact every member of the
international community who loves peace," he said.source ---------------------------------------------------------------the Guardian Why Palestinians are calling for a boycott of Israeli universities A Palestinian academic union urges British colleagues to back a boycott in support of 'our struggle for justice' By Amjad Barham 26-5-2009Palestinian
academics have been heartened by the outpouring of solidarity with our
people on the part of British academics and students â the latter
attested to by the creative "student occupation movement" in the wake
of the brutal Israeli war against the Palestinian people in Gaza last
December and January. What does the Palestinian academic community expect from international colleagues? It
has sometimes been suggested that solidarity with Palestinian academics
is best expressed in fostering academic links between British and
Palestinian universities, with the aim of strengthening the capacity of
Palestinian academic institutions that have suffered from the long
siege imposed by Israel's colonial regime. While we value
academic and institutional forms of support, we feel that this is not
sufficient. Decades of life under military occupation have taught us
that no sustainable development, including in the academy, is possible
without freedom from occupation and oppression. We are keenly
aware that British intellectuals and academics have been at the
forefront of many international campaigns for justice, the most
illustrious and successful of which was the fight against the apartheid
regime in South Africa. What we ask for is moral consistency: if it was
acceptable for British academics to support unreservedly the academic
boycott of South Africa with a view to ending the system of apartheid,
then the same should apply in the case of Israel. It is the duty
of civil society to shoulder the moral responsibility of isolating
Israel in the international arena through various forms of boycott and
sanctions to compel it to obey international law and respect
Palestinian rights. It is well documented that Israeli academic
institutions are deeply complicit in Israel's colonial and racist
policies against the Palestinian people. Not only do Israeli
universities and research institutions co-operate closely with the
security-military establishment through research and other academic
activities, they have never dissociated themselves from the occupation
regime, despite the more than four decades of the systematic stifling
of Palestinian education. Israeli universities have never
condemned the entrenched and institutionalised system of discrimination
against Palestinian citizens of Israel within the Israeli polity,
society and even the academy. Israel and its supporters have
argued that the Palestinian call for institutional boycott infringes
the universal principle of academic freedom. Palestinians find this
argument biased and hypocritical â not to mention based on false
premises. The privileging of academic freedom above more basic
human rights conflicts with the very idea of universal human rights, as
it assigns far more importance to the academic freedom of a sector of
Israeli society than to the fundamental rights of all Palestinians to
live in freedom and dignity. Is upholding the academic freedom â in our
view, the privileges â of Israeli academics a loftier aim than
defending the freedom of an entire people living under a brutal and
illegal occupation? "Constructive engagement" with the Israeli
academy is often suggested to us as a more effective mechanism to
address the injustice inflicted upon us by Israel. We have tried this
method, only to realise that as long as the terms of the relationship
between the Israelis and the Palestinians are those of occupier and
occupied, and oppressor and oppressed, the engagement process only
results in normalising the occupation on the ground and whitewashing
Israeli atrocities abroad. I can give an example from my own
personal experience. Once, as I was crossing one of the hundreds of
military checkpoints on my way to my university, I was stopped by an
Israeli soldier who turned out to be a fellow mathematician at an
Israeli university. But our collegiality ended here: he told me that I
could cross the checkpoint if I was able to answer a mathematics
question correctly! What kind of engagement can be possible here? As
to the charge that the boycott is discriminatory, it is completely
false. The Palestinian boycott call is institutional; it simply does
not target individual Israeli academics and cannot, therefore, be
"discriminatory" in any real sense of the term. Endorsing and applying
the boycott does not in any way prevent individual Israeli academics
from participating in international academic conferences and research
projects, so long as the projects themselves are not based on
institutional links with Israeli universities and research centers. Moreover,
being enshrined in universalist values and principles, the boycott call
adopted by an overwhelming majority in Palestinian civil society
categorically rejects all forms of racial discrimination and racism,
including Islamophobia and anti-Semitism. Finally, we of course
recognise and deeply appreciate the steadily increasing support for the
boycott we are witnessing among Israeli academics, who have reached the
conclusion that only sustained pressure on Israel and its complicit
institutions can bring about a just peace. Our struggle for
justice and peace is best supported through actions that aim at ending
Israel's impunity by compelling it to respect international law and our
rights. Boycott is the most effective among those.⢠Dr Amjad Barham is president of the Palestinian Federation of Unions of University Professors and Employees (PFUUPE) source ---------------------------------------------------------------WSW Pro-Israel forces attempt to silence University of California Santa Barbara professor By Jack Cody 25-5-2009On
January 19 University of California Santa Barbara sociology Professor
William Robinson sent an email to students on the roster of his Global
Affairs course in which he compared the Israeli occupation of Gaza to
the Warsaw Ghetto. He was subsequently brought up on disciplinary
charges by the Academic Senate of the university, as well as subjected
to harassment and persecution by pro-Israeli elements. The
charges against Robinson pose a serious threat to academic freedom.
They are an effort to intimidate critics of Israeli policy at a time
when that regimeâs actions have produced widespread revulsion.
Ultimately, the aim of such witch-hunts is to silence those opposed to
the policies of one of the US governmentâs key allies. Robinsonâs
January 19 email began with a strong denunciation of the Israeli
assault on Gaza. The professor, who is Jewish, wrote: âGaza is Israelâs
Warsawâa vast concentration camp that confined and blockaded
Palestinians, subjecting them to the slow death of malnutrition,
disease and despair, nearly two years before their subjection to the
quick death of Israeli bombs. We are witness to a slow-motion process
of genocide (Websters: âthe systematic killing of, or a program of
action intended to destroy, a whole national or ethnic groupâ), a
process whose objective is not so much to physically eliminate each and
every Palestinian than to eliminate the Palestinians as a people in any
meaningful sense of the notion of people-hood.â Robinson then
displayed a graphic set of photographs that had been circulating the
Internet through email forwards. At the time Robinson was unaware of
the identity of the originator of the email, although he subsequently
learned that it was a Jewish-American professor at another university.
The series juxtaposed photographs of Nazi operations and atrocities
with images of Israeli crimes in Gaza. The photo series is
arranged such that each image from one time period is displayed next to
a corresponding image from the other. Pictures of the Warsaw Ghetto are
on the left, Gaza on the right. The photographs are disturbing, as is
the often-uncanny similarity apparent in the side-by-side images. The
full original course material can be viewed at the Committee to Defend
Academic Freedom at UCSB, a blog created in defense of Professor
Robinson, and the principle of academic freedom by a group of UCSB
students (http://sb4af.wordpress.com/ ). On
February 9 Robinson received a copy of a letter that the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL) sent, in addition to Robinson himself, to
the president of the University of California system based in Oakland,
the chancellor of UCSB, his dean and the chair of his department. The
ADL, a prominent defender of Israeli policy, accuses Robinson of
anti-Semitism and of abusing his access to university resources by
using the student mailing list to disseminate personal views unrelated
to course material. On February 19 these same accusations
appeared in two official grievances filed with the university by two of
Robinsonâs former students. The pair had withdrawn from the course,
unbeknownst to Robinson, because they claimed the content of the email
was intimidating and, according to one student, made her ânauseous.â
The claims of misconduct put forth by the two students are nearly
identical and are very similar to those cited in the ADLâs February 9
letter. The accusations against Robinson are baseless and
politically motivated. In an interview with the World Socialist Web
Site, he discussed the issues involved. âThe essence of the
charges,â Professor Robinson said, âis that the course material I
submitted was anti-Semitic, and according to these letters [from the
ADL and the two students], it was anti-Semitic because it was critical
of the state of Israel. That is absurd, that the condemnation of the
policies of the state of Israel is equivalent to anti-Semitism. One,
anti-Semitism, is the discrimination against and oppression of a
religious/ethnic group, and the other, criticism of Israel, is a
condemnation of the policies of a nation-state.â As to the
charges that the material contained in the email was unrelated to the
course, Robinson responded: âHow in the world the invasion of Gaza in
January is unrelated to a course on global affairs in the same month is
absolutely beyond my comprehension!â The UCSB catalogue
describes the course as a â[s]urvey of the principal theories and
debates in globalization studies, with a focus on economic, political
and cultural transnational processes.â According to this description,
the military occupation of one sovereign territory by another is
clearly highly relevant to such a course. âOn March 9,â Robinson
pointed out, âAbraham Foxman, the president of the ADL convenes a
meeting on the campus of the University of California Santa Barbara
with about ten faculty members and two deans. Some people at the
meeting assume the purpose of the meeting was to search for a chair of
the Jewish Studies program, but when the meeting starts, Foxman
announces that the only thing on his agenda is the demand that I be
prosecuted. âOn March 25 the university announces it is opening
up a formal inquiry, a formal investigation of me and bringing me up on
charges of possible violation of the faculty code of conduct. What is
going on here is a tremendous assault on academic freedom; an assault
in which the community has been complicit, and an assault which has
been orchestrated from outside the university by the Israel lobby. âWhat
became clear is that the entire grievance process had been orchestrated
from the outside by the Israel lobby. This is part of a more systematic
campaign. The Israel lobby goes after anyone and everyone that
criticizes the state of Israel. âWhat is particularly egregious
in this case,â says Robinson, âis that the University of California
Santa Barbara is undermining academic freedom, bringing shame to the
university. Some university officials have been complicit with this
attack against me and this attack against academic freedom. We have
documented a whole series of procedural irregularities.â Professor
Robinson has received strong support from students and professors on
the campus, as well as concerned members of the local community. A
group of students created the Committee To Defend Academic Freedom at
UCSB and launched a Web site documenting up-to-date details of the
Robinson case and mobilizing resources to counter the pro-Israeli
forces. âStudents on the campus, graduates and undergraduates, when
they heard of this, became enraged,â says Robinson. âThey feel that the
integrity of their own education is under threat.â A forum to
discuss academic freedom originally scheduled to take place on the
campus of UCSB on May 7 was put off until May 21 to make arrangements
to accommodate a larger audience due to the amount of popular interest
over the Robinson case within the Santa Barbara community.source Archive: 10 feb 2009 - 4 may 2009
Overzicht Reacties over dit Artikel