Stop de bezetting van palestina

Stop de bezetting
 Vrienden:
  1558 X
 Tegenstanders:
  65 X

BDS. Boycott, also by Universities (old version)

Reageer (0)

29-1-2010
As of today there has been made a new section for BDS and Universities.
Nieuwe sectie voor BDS en Universiteiten hier


---------------------------------------------------------------                    

Facebook
pagina over dit onderwerp

---------------------------------------------------------------

Ha'aretz
    

Jordanian protesters burning an Israeli flag at an anti-Israel protest in Amman last year.(Reuters)
   
By Barak Ravid

12-2-2010
Israel is facing a global campaign of delegitimization, according to a report by the Reut Institute, made available to the cabinet on Thursday. The Tel Aviv-based security and socioeconomic think tank called on ministers to treat the matter as a strategic threat.

The report cites anti-Israel demonstrations on campuses, protests when Israeli athletes compete abroad, moves in Europe to boycott Israeli products, and threats of arrest warrants for Israeli leaders visiting London.

Reut says the campaign is the work of a worldwide network of private individuals and organizations. They have no hierarchy or overall commander, but work together based on a joint ideology - portraying Israel as a pariah state and denying its right to exist.

Reut lists the network's major hubs - London, Brussels, Madrid, Toronto, San Francisco and the University of California, Berkeley. The network's activists - "delegitimizers" the report dubs them - are relatively marginal: young people, anarchists, migrants and radical political activists. Although they are not many, they raise their profile using public campaigns and media coverage, the report says.

The "delegitimizers" cooperate with organizations engaging in legitimate criticism of Israel's policy in the territories such as Amnesty and Human Rights Watch, blurring the line between legitimate censure and delegitimization. They also promote pro-Palestinian activities in Europe as "trendy," the report says.

The network's activists are not mostly Palestinian, Arab or Muslim. Many of them are European and North American left-wing activists. The Western left has changed its approach to Israel and now sees it as an occupation state, the report says. To those left-wing groups, if in the 1960s Israel was seen as a model for an egalitarian, socialist society, today it epitomizes Western evil.

The delegitimization network sees the fight against the former regime in South Africa as a success model. It believes that like the apartheid regime, the Zionist-Israeli model can be toppled and a one-state model can be established.

The Reut team says the network's groups share symbols and heroes such as the Palestinian boy Mohammed al-Dura, American peace activist Rachel Corrie and joint events like the Durban Conference.

Israel's diplomats overseas, meanwhile, must counter the attempts to delegitimize the country. "The combination of a large Muslim community, a radical left, influential, English-language media and an international university center make London fertile ground for Israel's delegitimization," says Ron Prosor, Israel's ambassador in London.

Prosor gives many interviews to the British media and lectures at university campuses throughout the country. Although he says he has encountered anti-Israel demonstrations on almost every campus, Prosor has told his people to increase their campus activity.

"What is now happening in London universities will happen, at most, in five years at all the large universities in the United States," he says.

The Reut report says Israel is not prepared at all to deal with the threat of delegitimization. The cabinet has not defined the issue as a threat and sees the diplomatic arena as marginal compared to the military one.

"The Foreign Ministry is built for the challenges of the '60s, not the 2000s," the report says. "There are no budgets, not enough diplomats and no appropriate diplomatic doctrine."

Reut recommends setting up a counter-network, in which Israel's embassies in centers of delegitimization activity would serve as "front positions."

The report says the intelligence service should monitor the organizations' activities and study their methods. The cabinet should also confront groups trying to delegitimize Israel but embrace those engaged in legitimate criticism.

The report adds that Israel should not boycott these groups, as Israel's embassy in Washington does with the left-wing lobby J Street. Boycotting critics merely pushes them toward joining the delegitimizers, Reut says.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Mondoweiss

by Alex Kane

Student disruptions of Israeli officials continue to make waves


See also here

11-2-2010
The student protests at Oxford University and the University of California, Irvine that interrupted Israeli officials’ speeches are continuing to make waves in a variety of ways.

An apparent anti-Semitic remark in Arabic was hurled at Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon during the interruptions to his speech. Various media outlets are reporting that a protester yelled, “kill the Jews” at Ayalon, a former Israeli ambassador to the United States and a member of the far-right Yisrael Beiteinu party.

Ayalon is now considering pressing charges against the student who yelled at him. According to the Independent (UK), he said the move against the student demonstrated “our new policy on hatred and racism. We will have zero tolerance for anti-Semitism, something that should have happened a long time ago.”

The local police and the Oxford Union have launched investigations into the matter.

Of course, what these media reports don’t mention is the irony that as Ayalon is denouncing “hatred and racism,” he is a member of a political party whose leader, Avigdor Lieberman, is on record saying numerous racist remarks against Palestinians. For instance, Lieberman called for the execution of Arab members of the Knesset who met with Hamas, and ran a campaign centered around the slogan, “no citizenship without loyalty,” wanting Palestinians living inside Israel to be forced to sign a “loyalty” oath to the Jewish State. And Yisrael Beiteinu has introduced legislation that would ban commemoration of the Nakba.

Then there’s J Street U, the student branch of J Street, which released a statement seemingly painting the disruptions of Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren and Ayalon’s speeches as anti-Semitic and racist. The statement reads, in part:

    J Street U is deeply concerned about recent incidents on college campuses aimed at obstructing civil and open debate around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    We believe that universities should be a place for an honest discussion about tough issues. While appropriate and respectful protests are a legitimate and important part of the conversation on campus, anti-Semitic, racist, disruptive and inflammatory actions and language are simply unacceptable.

    In particular, we were profoundly offended by the anti-Semitic rhetoric used by a student to attack Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon during a recent talk at Oxford University. We were also deeply disappointed to hear about attempts to interrupt Ambassador Michael Oren’s remarks at the University of California, Irvine, with heckling aimed at drowning out the Ambassador’s speech.

The statement comes as Oren said that the rift between Oren and J Street– a result of Oren’s refusal to attend a J Street conference last October–is healing. Oren told the Los Angeles Jewish Journal that, “J Street has now come and supported Congressman [Howard] Berman’s Iran sanction bill; it has condemned the Goldstone report; it has denounced the British court’s decision to try Tzipi Livni for war crimes, which puts J Street much more into the mainstream.”

During Oren’s speech at the University of California, Irvine, 11 students were arrested for interrupting his speech.  The Muslim Public Affairs Council has demanded an investigation over the arrests in a letter to school officials, saying:

    University police had every right to escort the individuals out of the room, and bar them from re-entering. However, it is unclear what law they broke that would allow for them to be arrested for their actions. For this reason, we are calling on your office and that of the UCI Police Department to conduct a thorough and transparent investigation into the arrest of these students.

Source


---------------------------------------------------------------
Mondoweiss

Oxford students: Our protest of Ayalon was a massive success

by Philip Weiss

10-2-2010
The official report of Oxford University’s Palestine Society on last night’s demonstrations against the speech by Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon:

Danny Ayalon, Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister and member of the far-right Yisrael Beitenu party, came to the Oxford Union on 8 February, on a desperate PR mission to resuscitate Israel’s image after global public condemnation for its war crimes in Gaza last year. The Oxford Students’ Palestine Society, together with other student groups and members of the public, organised a protest, both on the street outside the Union and within the debating chamber itself.

It is our belief that Yisrael Beitenu, Danny Ayalon’s party, is a racist party which advocates apartheid policies. Ayalon himself refuses to recognise the West Bank and Jerusalem as Occupied Territory and is attempting to introduce legislation which would criminalise Palestinians who celebrate their national day of remembrance, Nakba Day. The fact that such a figure was invited to the Oxford Union unopposed is a disgrace. As such, we, the Oxford Students’ Palestine Society, felt it necessary to present our own challenge, and demonstrate the continuing resistance to apartheid, to occupation, to the crippling blockade on Gaza, to house demolitions and to settlement building.

The protest was a massive success. Outside, over a hundred people joined together to chant slogans in support of Palestine, carrying banners condemning Israeli policy and waving the Palestinian flag. Inside, numerous individual students interrupted the talk, challenging Ayalon’s assertions that the West Bank and East Jerusalem were not Occupied Territory, and that Israel had ‘given up’ a third of its country in its peace deal with Egypt. Before long, Ayalon was not able to continue his rehearsed speech, and was forced to contend with a gathering storm of intelligent questions and statements contradicting his evasions and outright lies. At one point a member of the Palestine Society read out a full page of the Goldstone Report dealing with Israel’s deliberate killing of civilians, to thunderous applause from the audience. Another student raised a Palestinian flag and called out a list of Israel’s war crimes, including the use of chemical weapons during the war on Gaza in January 2009. Israel’s ambassador to the UK, Ron Prosor, sitting in the front row, looked bewildered and embarrassed by his colleague’s feeble performance.

Beyond the hosting of Ayalon, and his outrageous remarks, the real scandal of the evening was the thuggery of Ayalon’s security staff. After the talk, as one protestor photographed their car, the security staff drove straight into him. This sort of violence is commonplace in the Occupied Territories, but rarely exposed outside them, seeming particularly surreal in Oxford. The protestor was carried on the car bonnet a hundred yards down New Inn Hall Street, clinging on as the security staff sped up. When he managed to fling himself clear, the protestor was badly bruised, but luckily escaped serious injury. Two other Oxford students had been forced to jump for cover as the car accelerated. After the car swiftly disappeared, the three lodged an official complaint. Thames Valley Police are now investigating the incident, having been provided with photographic evidence.

Nevertheless, despite the violence, the incident could not detract from the success of the protest, nor distract from the clear message that students sent to Ayalon and his state: until Israel ends its illegal occupation and the Palestinians receive the justice they have been denied for the last six decades, Israel’s representatives and propagandists will not be welcome at Oxford University. This is the same message which British students sent to President Shimon Peres in November 2008, and which American students sent to former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in October 2009. It was sent again to Ambassador Michael Oren by students in California, on the same day as our protest at Ayalon’s appearance in Oxford. The call for justice continues.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

PACBI


Boycott "Ariel" and the Rest! All Israeli Academic Institutions are Complicit in Occupation and Apartheid

10-2-2010
In response to the recent decision by the Israeli government to upgrade the status of the so-called Ariel University Center of Samaria (AUCS) to a full university, the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) reiterates its call for a boycott of AUCS and all other Israeli academic institutions due to their complicity in maintaining Israel‘s occupation, colonization and apartheid against the Palestinian people.
While PACBI welcomes the recent protests against the decision to recognize AUCS--located in the fourth largest Jewish colony in the occupied Palestinian territories–-as a university, it cautions against attempts to divert the boycott movement away from its basis in the comprehensive, UN-sanctioned rights embodied in the Palestinian call for boycotting Israel to a selective focus on a subset of these rights.

Academics, journalists and others on the Zionist "left" who have opposed the academic boycott for years are now enthusiastically advocating a boycott that solely targets Ariel College because it is illegally built on occupied Palestinian territory. This, however, reduces the scope of the academic boycott to one against settlement institutions, while exonerating the Israeli academy at large, which is just as complicit, if not more, than Ariel in maintaining and justifying the Israeli colonial and apartheid apparatus. But even if the boycott were to apply only to universities built on occupied Palestinian territory, why hasn‘t the fact that the Hebrew University‘s Mount Scopus campus sits on occupied Palestinian land in East Jerusalem provoked any Ariel-like condemnation?

All Israeli universities are deeply linked to the military-security establishment, playing indispensable -- direct and indirect -- roles in perpetuating Israel‘s decades-old violations of international law and fundamental Palestinian rights. No Israeli university or academic union has ever taken a public position against the occupation, let alone against Israel‘s system of apartheid or the denial of Palestinian refugee rights. Israeli universities are profoundly complicit in developing weapon systems and military doctrines deployed in Israel‘s recent war crimes in Gaza [1]; justifying the ongoing colonization of Palestinian land and gradual ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinians [2]; providing moral justification for extra-judicial killings and indiscriminate attacks against civilians [3]; systematically discriminating against "non-Jewish" students in admissions, dormitory room eligibility, financial aid, etc.; and many other implicit and explicit violations of human rights and international law. [4]

As BDS gains momentum globally, an increasing number of Israeli voices are emerging in support of this strategy as the most effective, non-violent route to bring about change towards justice and durable peace. The endorsement by Israeli artists and academics of specific boycott actions in the past few years is welcome and well known. After Israel’s war of aggression on Gaza, several Israeli academic and cultural figures came out in support of BDS. [5] Long before the Gaza massacre, though, staunch Israeli supporters of Palestinian rights such as Rachel Giora, Ilan Pappe, Haim Bresheeth, Oren Ben-Dor, Anat Matar and the late Tanya Reinhart had embraced BDS and defended it against Israeli critics, particularly so-called "leftists" in the academy. [6] The recently formed group, Boycott! Supporting the Palestinian BDS Call from Within [7], is particularly praiseworthy, as it unconditionally accepts BDS as defined and guided by the Palestinian BDS National Committee, and is therefore regarded by the BNC as a reliable and principled partner in the movement.

These emerging voices from inside Israeli society point to the growing appeal of BDS and the recognition of its power to effect real change towards just peace. It is nevertheless crucial to emphasize that the BDS movement derives its principles from both the demands of the Palestinian BDS Call, signed by over 170 Palestinian civil society organizations in July 2005, [8] and, in the academic and cultural fields, from the Palestinian Call for Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, issued a year earlier in July 2004. [9] Together, the BDS and PACBI Calls represent the most authoritative and widely supported strategic statements to have emerged from Palestine in decades; all political factions, labour, student and women organizations, and refugee groups across the Arab world have supported and endorsed these calls. Both calls underline the prevailing Palestinian belief that the most effective form of solidarity with the Palestinian people is direct action aimed at bringing an end to Israel’s colonial and apartheid regime, just as the apartheid regime in South Africa was abolished, by isolating Israel internationally through boycotts and sanctions, forcing it to comply with international law and respect Palestinian rights.

Since the formulation of these calls, a great deal of emphasis has been placed on defining the principles of the boycott movement. Rooted in universal values and principles, the BDS Call categorically rejects all forms of racism, racial discrimination and colonial oppression. PACBI has also translated the principles enshrined in its Call into practical guidelines for implementing the international academic and cultural boycott of Israel. [10] All the while, the Palestinian boycott movement has been clear as to what the focus and goals of the BDS movement are.

In this respect, the importance of the 2005 BDS Call lies in its comprehensive approach to the Israeli colonial and apartheid system as a whole, and its subjugation of the Palestinian people, whether as second-class citizens inside Israel, subjects under its military occupation, or dispossessed refugees. This was summarized in the concise demands outlined in the Palestinian BDS call that Israel recognize the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self determination and fully comply with international law by: respecting, protecting and promoting the right of return of all Palestinian refugees; ending the occupation of all Palestinian and Arab lands; and recognizing full equality for the Palestinian citizens of Israel. In this sense, the BDS Call effectively counters the systematic Israeli fragmentation of the Palestinian people and the reduction of the struggle for freedom and self-determination to an endless bargaining game over land in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Central to the Palestinian BDS movement’s three demands is an understanding of Israel as an apartheid state. Israel fits the UN definition of apartheid not just in the West Bank and Gaza Strip; it defines itself as a Jewish state, not a state of all its citizens. Most importantly, Israeli laws, policies, and practices discriminate openly against Palestinian--i.e., "non-Jewish"-- citizens of the state. The pervasive and institutionalized racism and discrimination are particularly evident in the vital domains of land ownership and use, education, employment, access to public services, and urban planning. The apartheid character has been part of the design of Israel since its inception. [11]

The state of Israel was established in 1948 by forcibly displacing the overwhelming majority of Palestine’s indigenous Arab population from their homeland. Today, these Palestinian refugees are prevented from returning to their homes and lands from which they were expelled. In contrast, any person who claims Jewish descent from anywhere in the world may become an Israeli citizen and national under the so-called Law of Return. Moreover, Israel’s brutal war on Gaza was not an anomaly; rather, it represents the most recent example of the systematic policies of ethnic cleansing and colonial oppression that Israel has carried out against the Palestinian people for more than six decades. During this recent military onslaught, Israel killed over 1,440 Palestinians, of whom 431 were children, and injured another 5380. [12] Israel subjected the besieged population of Gaza to three weeks of unrelenting state terror.

Despite the clarity with which the Palestinian BDS movement has enunciated the goals of the Palestinian struggle, some Israeli and other advocates of boycott have tried to limit its scope.  They have attempted to limit the goals of the BDS movement by restricting it geo-politically and confining it to a call to end the Israeli occupation over the West Bank and Gaza Strip. This "interpretation" of BDS is most dangerous as it attempts to appropriate the right to redefine the terms of the struggle in Palestine and to impose an ideologically suspect political agenda that lets Israel off the hook on the charges of apartheid and practicing the most pernicious form of racism and discrimination in all the territory under its control.

Some Israelis also base their support for BDS on a purely utilitarian rationale, that of ‘saving Israel from itself,’ rather than principled solidarity with the Palestinians. This Israel-centered, “pragmatic” perspective, however, reproduces a colonial attitude of superiority where the indigenous population and their inalienable rights and struggle for freedom are not even recognized. What matter, according to this perspective, are Israel’s own self-interest, international image, and future. Yet if some are committed to preserving Israel’s character into the future without challenging its colonial and apartheid laws and policies, how can they be counted on as true allies in the Palestinian-led, global BDS movement? 

As for the targets chosen for BDS actions, the strength of the BDS movement lies in the fact that it does not impose specific targets or tactics on solidarity groups around the world. Based on the principle of context-sensitivity and respect for the autonomy and integrity of democratic international groups supporting Palestinian rights, the Palestinian BDS collective leadership has always believed that people of conscience and organizations advocating human rights know their respective situation best and are the most capable of deciding the appropriate ways and pace to build the BDS movement in their contexts. Sometimes the tactical targeting of settlement-only products may be the best way for a campaign to progress. At other times, it may be resolutions at local unions endorsing BDS, or cultural boycott targets, etc. But even if one were concerned only about Israel’s occupation, not its denial of refugee rights or its apartheid system, this cannot justify a principled focus on boycotting “settlement products” only, as if Israel’s colonies themselves were the party guilty of colonialism, not the state that established them and sustains their growth. In no other boycott context in the world does anyone call for boycotting a manifestation of a state’s violations of international law, rather than the state itself. After all, under international law states are the legal entities that are supposed to be held accountable for crimes and violations that they commit.

Regardless, it is never up to Israeli academics or activists, no matter what their principles are, to set out the reference parameters and priorities of the movement, particularly for activists worldwide. More often than not, members of the Zionist left have refused to recognize the BDS Call issued by the overwhelming majority of Palestinian civil society organizations, and its anchor and leadership, the Palestinian BDS National Committee, BNC. [13] In so doing they fail to respect the aspirations of the Palestinian people and our right to define the goals of our struggle. Moreover, in response to the Zionist left’s insistence on focusing on the symptoms of the Israeli system of colonial oppression, by calling only for an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, it is worth emphasizing that in apartheid South Africa it would have been ludicrous to focus solely on the Bantustans. The struggle against the Bantustans was an intrinsic part of the struggle to end the apartheid system as a structure of dominance whereby the white minority subjugated and oppressed the Black South African population.

As a people living under Israeli apartheid and exiled from their land, it is up to the Palestinians and their mass organizations to set their priorities, objectives and strategies to attain our rights under international law. Israeli support is a welcome and necessary part of this movement. But it must be extended in the spirit of real solidarity, as in the case of Boycott From Within, respecting the wishes and aspirations of the Palestinian people themselves.

[1] See, for example, the following incriminating evidence against Tel Aviv University‘s partnership with the Israeli army and weapons industries: http://www.electronicintifada.net/downloads/pdf/090708-soas-palestine-society.pdf

[2] http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=63

[3] http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1062127.html and Reuven Pedatzur, The Israeli Army House Philosopher, Haaretz, 24 February 2004.

[4] http://www.alternativenews.org/images/stories/downloads/Economy_of_the_occupation_23-24.pdf

[5] See, for example, Neve Gordon’s BDS article at: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-gordon20-2009aug20,0,1126906.story and Udi Aloni’s at: http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=37582

[6] See, for example, Tanya Reinhart’s letter to Israeli academic Baruch Kimmerling at: http://www.mediamonitors.net/tanya13.html

[7] http://www.boycottisrael.info

[8] http://bdsmovement.net/?q=node/52

[9] http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=869

[10] http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=1047 and http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=1107

[11] For more on Israel‘s regime of occupation, colonization and apartheid see this important BNC strategic position paper: http://bdsmovement.net/files/English-BNC_Position_Paper-Durban_Review.pdf

[12] http://www.ochaopt.org/gazacrisis/index.php?section=3

[13] For example Uri Avnery’s sweeping dismissal of the Palestinian BDS Call and the Palestinian BDS National Committee: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1252168050

Source
---------------------------------------------------------------

Ha'aretz

British academics urge Elton John to cancel Israel concert


   
Elton John
(AP)

       
9-2-2010
A group of British academics have called on singer Elton John to cancel his scheduled performance in Israel this June.

"Political or not political, when you stand up on that stage in Tel Aviv, you line yourself up with a racist state," the British Committee for Universities of Palestine wrote in an open letter to John on Monday. "Do you want to give them the satisfaction? Please don't go."

In the letter, the group urged John to read the Goldstone Commission's report on Israel's conduct during the war in Gaza last year in order to understand why his performance carried an inherently political undertone.

"You may say you're not a political person, but does an army dropping white phosphorus on a school building full of children demand a political response? Does walling a million and a half people up in a ghetto and then pounding that ghetto to rubble require a political response from us, or a human one?

"You're behaving as if playing in Israel is morally neutral - but how can it be? How can the cruelties Israel practices against the Palestinians - fundamentally because the Palestinians are there, on Palestinian land, and Israel wants them to go - be morally neutral?"

"Okay, you turn up in Ramat Gan, and it gets to that 'Candle in the Wind? moment, and thousands of lighters flicker - but there won't be any Palestinians from the Occupied Territories swaying along with the Israelis - the army won't let them leave their ghettoes.

"Please read what Judge Goldstone said about the onslaught on Gaza; what Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have been saying for decades about the crimes committed against the Palestinians. Of course the Israeli state denies it has a case to answer, though it's knee-deep in ethnic cleansing and land-theft and the endless daily suffocating of Palestinian lives and hopes."

Israel boycotters succeeded just weeks ago in convincing Santana to cancel his own performance. Similar attempts to get Leonard Cohen and Paul McCartney to stay away, however, failed

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Ha'aretz

What is the reason to start the header of this article with "Muslim students"
Were this only
Muslims? How do you know that? Or is it just spinning and polarisation?


You can see it yourself below on the Video found on the internet

Note the difference in reporting by al Jazeera just below this article (H.).


Raucous protesters disrupt Israeli ambassador speech at UCI
Twelve people were arrested during a lecture at UC Irvine where Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren came to talk about U.S.-Israel relations. Video by Eugene Garcia, ocregister.com


More video's here

Source
---------------------------------------------------------------

    
Israel's Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren.
(Kobi Gideon)

    
(Muslim?) students scream 'killer' during Israel envoy speech in L.A.

By Natasha Mozgovaya

Police arrest 12 hecklers who disrupted Michael Oren's speech at California university.
 
9-2-2010
California police reportedly made 12 arrests on Monday after a speech by Israel's U.S. Ambassador Michael Oren descended into chaos.
Hecklers interrupted Oren's lecture at University of California, Irvine, over 10 times, shouting "killers" and "how many Palestinians did you kill?"

Oren took a 20 minute break after the fourth protest, only to be interrupted again by young men yelling at him every few minutes, local press reported.

Many members of the audience also applauded Oren.

The arrested students were apparently (?-H.) members of the university's Muslim Student Union, which had publicly condemned Oren's visit earlier in the day.

In a statement printed by the Orange County Register, a newspaper, the union said:

"We condemn and oppose the presence of Michael Oren, the ambassador of Israel to the United States, on our campus today.

"We resent that the Law School and the Political Science Department on our campus have agreed to cosponsor a public figure who represents a state that continues to break international and humanitarian law and is condemned by more UN Human Rights Council resolutions than all other countries in the world combined."

Oren eventually completed his speech, some time later than scheduled, but did not take questions from the audience as planned.

University Chancellor Michael Drake was booed by some and applauded by others when he told the audience that he was embarrassed by the outburst.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

al Jazeera

Israeli diplomats 'hazed' on campus

By Clayton Swisher   



11-2-2010
Pro-Palestinian university students appear to be growing more vocal and organized with their frustrations. And it's a phenomena that seems to have caught the Israelis off guard.

The Israelis have a lot of experience dealing with asymmetrical warfare.  But they're not exactly used to its latest manifestation, which could be coming to a college campus near you.

Committed activists let their frustrations be heard on Monday in two separate lectures delivered by senior Israeli diplomats.

While the videos go viral among students, its watching the tactics used at these events that must be leaving Israel unnerved.

Consider the way in which a mockery was made of Israel's Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren, who presented at the University of California at Irvine.

The New York-born former academic had nary a minute to get into his talking points when he himself was taken to school by angry students, at least one of whom shouted "propagating murder is not an expression of free speech!"

The heckling made it impossible for Oren to carry on, and persisted in spite of pleas and threats by audience members and promises of arrest by the rattled college rector.

Most of the Oren's detractors made reference to Israel's actions during the  2009 Gaza War.

Israel is under heavy strain by UN officials and international rights organizations to be held accountable for crimes of war during the 17-day Israeli assault on Gaza.  Some from academia have defended Israel from the charges, including Harvard's Alan Dershowitz, who went so far as to attack UN Investigator Richard Goldstone with a provocative Hebrew word that translates as "traitor to the Jewish people".

Off guard?

But by in large, what is making me take notice is how pro-Palestinian students seem to be growing more vocal and organized with their frustrations.

It's a phenomena that seems to have caught the Israelis off guard.  When Oren's appeal for Middle East-like hospitality failed, Oren jousted: "This is not London or Tehran!"  

He must have been clairvoyant.  Across the Pond at Oxford Union on that same day, it was not exactly going swimmingly for Deputy Foreign Minister Dann Ayalon, trying also to lay down a rote defense of Israel.

Students there also used timed interruptions, and apparently racist invectives, to upset their Israeli guest. 

Unlike Saudi Arabia's Prince Turki, these students were more interested in shaking fists at Ayalon than afterwards shaking hands.

The implications of this week's Israeli diplo-heckling are uncertain. Aside from threatened legal action by Ayalon, stiffer heckling penalties will likely be imposed, but can only go so far.  These guys are professional and, in Ayalon's case, should know from experience how to handle themselves.

Much as some might hope, campus gumshoes are unlikely to bar students from attending based on their affiliations, religion, or appearance, lest they abandon the pluralistic values which underpin most institutions and set themselves up for lawsuits.  

Instead organizers will have to find other ways to keep this youthful equalizer at bay, which will probably mean skipping universities with large pro-Palestinian activist bodies.  And that seems to be a widening community.

NOTE: Middle East passions also reached my Alma Mater last month where the same exact tactics were used to frustrate a presentation by U.S. CENTCOM Commander General David Petraeus.

Last October, Ehud Olmert, the former Israeli prime minister, also faced a tough crowd despite steps taken by the university.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

End the Occupation


Boycott and divestment gets mainstream attention in church, on campus


4-2-2010
It's good news to see that boycott and divestment campaigns against companies profiting from Israeli occupation and apartheid are becoming increasingly mainstream.

Here's a couple of recent examples.

The National Catholic Reporter ran a great article about the Kairos Document produced by the Palestinian Christian community, calling for churches around the world to intervene for justice and peace in Israel/Palestine via boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) campaigns:

    "The leaders of the thirteen Christian communities serving in the Palestinian territories -- including Latin and Orthodox patriarchs -- have declared the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian Territories a “sin against God and humanity” and urged Christians everywhere to nonviolently intervene to end its injustices....Such a response, the authors wrote, includes civil disobedience, boycotts, and divestment campaigns. “Resistance is a right and duty for Christians. But it is resistance with love as its logic,” they said....The national committee for the Palestinian Boycott and Divestment and Sanctions campaign said it “saluted the moral clarity, courage, and principled position conveyed in this new document which emphasizes that resisting injustice should ‘concern the church.’ "

The article quotes US Campaign National Media Coordinator David Hosey in regards to U.S. church involvement with divestment campaigns:

    "David Hosey, media coordinator for the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and a missionary with the United Methodist Church, said members of the New England conference of that church are in correspondence with the targeted companies, the first step in “phased divestment.” The Methodists adopted a resolution in 2004 opposing the Israeli occupation of Palestinian Territories. Various regional conferences are now debating whether or not to express that opposition with divestment campaigns....

    As for action from the Roman Catholic Church, Hosey said members of the Sisters of Loretto, a U.S. order of Catholic women religious, were pushing for shareholder resolutions urging Caterpillar to stop its sale of militarized bulldozers to Israel.

    Christian calls for divestment have sparked criticism from various Jewish organizations and, at times, strained inter-religious dialogue. But Hosey thinks that could change as more Jewish and Israeli groups endorse using economic pressure to change Israeli action in the Occupied Territories."

Divestment is becoming part of the mainstream discourse on U.S. campuses as well. The University of Arizona Daily Wildcat now includes a weekly column on corporate involvement in the Israeli occupation. This week's column notes the connections between corporate accountability work against sweat shops, the BDS campaign against South African apartheid, and the BDS movement against Israeli occupation, as well as highlighting the University's investments in human rights abusers Caterpillar and Motorola:

    "After an intensive anti-sweatshop campaign last spring led by students in the Sweatshop-Free Coalition and University Community for Human Rights, President Robert Shelton had the UA divest our financial holdings in the Russell Corporation due to the company’s singularly cruel labor abuses in its factories in Honduras. Now, while all eyes are on Shelton as he continues to sit on the UA’s illegal business contracts with Caterpillar and Motorola, it’s worth noting that divestment activism on campus stretches back far beyond Shelton’s tenure and probably beyond everything else on campus except for the oldest of UA’s buildings........Motorola and Caterpillar, two companies perpetuating grisly crimes upon mostly Palestinian civilians in the occupied West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, are so unspeakable as to have prompted Jewish South African politician Ronnie Kasrils, who was quoted in the United Kingdom’s Guardian in a 2006 article, to denounce the U.S.-backed Israeli occupation as “much worse than apartheid” of the sort under which Kasrils and others survived for so many long, bloody years. A rich history has proven that UA students have risen to the occasion of doing everything they can to disassociate themselves and their universities from such atrocities. One doesn’t have to look far to see that such a time has come again."

Check out the US Campaign's website for resources on starting your own boycott and divestment campaign on campus and/or organizing against Caterpillar and Motorola in your community.

Source
---------------------------------------------------------------

the Heathlander

Don’t mean no trouble…

From the now legendary Cambridge Tab:

2-2-2010
‘The Cambridge University Israel Society have cancelled a talk  by former Cambridge student Benny Morris after pressure from students.

The political historian, who was due to speak at Catz, has been accused in the press of ‘Islamophobia’.

The decision to cancel the talk was made by Israel Society after a letter was sent to CUSU signed by over a dozen University employees and students, including committee members of the CU Islamic Society, and English Faculty staff.

[...]

King’s student, Jamie Stern-Weiner led a campaign on Facebook to have the talk cancelled. The group, which today had 40 members, described the invitation extended to Morris as “offensive and appalling” and questioned why “an official student society would want to invite such an individual”.

Stern-Weiner said “This is not a political issue, it’s about making a clear stand against hateful opinions and the impact they have on the atmosphere on campus.”’

Muahahaha!

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Electronic Intifada

Carleton University students launch campus divestment campaign
Statement, Students Against Israeli Apartheid - Carleton


1-2-2010
For the past several months, Students Against Israeli Apartheid - Carleton (SAIA), a student group at Carleton University in Ottawa that is committed to supporting the Palestinian struggle for freedom, has been conducting research on Carleton's investments in Israeli apartheid.
The Carleton Pension Fund currently lacks any ethical guidelines, with its only mandate being the maximization of profit. SAIA has discovered that the Pension Fund, which provides retirement income for Carleton staff and faculty, currently has some $2,762,535 invested in five companies that are complicit in the oppression of the Palestinian people. In light of these findings, SAIA has launched a campaign calling on Carleton to immediately divest from the offending corporations: Motorola, BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman, L-3 Communications and Tesco supermarkets, as well as to adopt a socially responsible investment policy for all of its investments.

Motorola is involved in designing and implementing perimeter surveillance systems around illegal Israeli settlements and military camps in the West Bank. Motorola and its subsidiaries also have hundreds of millions of dollars worth of contracts to supply the Israeli military with telecommunications technology, checkpoint security and control systems. By providing support for the Israeli military, Motorola plays a role in ensuring that settlement expansion will continue, and that the occupation will deepen, in a clear violation of international law.

BAE Systems is the world's third-largest arms producer. Both BAE and its Israeli subsidiary, Rokar, contribute to weaponry used by Israel to attack Palestinian civilians in the occupied West Bank and Gaza. BAE produces cluster bombs and the F-16 combat aircraft, which were used during the 2008-2009 assault on the Gaza Strip, which killed over 1,400 Palestinians, most of whom were non-combatant civilians.

Northrop Grumman, one of the world's largest weapons manufacturers, provided the Israeli military with many of the parts for the Apache AH64D Longbow Helicopter, which was described by Amnesty International as a piece of "key equipment used by the [Israeli military] in the [December 2008 - January 2009] Gaza bombing campaign." Furthermore, Northrop Grumman is the sole provider of radars for the F-16 combat aircraft. It also assists in producing the Longbow Hellfire 2 missiles, which, as has been documented by many human rights organizations, were widely used against Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

L-3 Communications is one of the many large multinational firms aiding in the construction and maintenance of the system of military checkpoints that severely restrict Palestinian freedom of movement in the West Bank and around Gaza. The matrix of checkpoints has been condemned by human rights organizations as a brutally repressive system that violates the basic human rights of the Palestinian people. In addition to being a means of political repression and land annexation, the checkpoints constitute a tool of collective punishment, which is a crime under international law.

Tesco Supermarkets is a large United Kingdom-based international grocery and general merchandising retail chain. It has been the target of social justice activists in the UK for selling produce originating from illegal Israeli settlements, for mislabeling products coming from the settlements as "West Bank," as well as for using an exporter, Carmel-Agrexco, which has been criticized for using slavery-type working conditions in its factories in the occupied West Bank. Tesco's financial support for the illegal Israeli settlements lends them legitimacy and enables their economic growth and physical expansion, while simultaneously inhibiting the development of the Palestinian economy.

Carleton is no stranger to boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) activism, and it has a strong precedent to build upon. In 1987, Carleton divested from all companies complicit in the apartheid regime in South Africa. Carleton's president at the time wrote a memorandum, saying, "Carleton University abhors apartheid and will do all it can to show its position on apartheid within its business practices." Given Carleton's past commitment to divesting from apartheid regimes, SAIA is calling on the university to once again place itself on the right side of history by ending its investments in the ongoing oppression of the Palestinian people.

The South African victory serves as an inspiring model for SAIA's divestment campaign, which is the first Palestine-centered divestment initiative in Canada. Hopes are high that, through a well-planned local campaign, as well as the natural growth of BDS, momentum will pick up at universities across the country and similar initiatives will emerge to form a national movement to cut campus ties with Israeli apartheid.

Specifically, SAIA recommends that:

1. The Carleton University Board of Governors, via the Pension Fund Committee, immediately divest of its stock in BAE Systems, L-3 Communications, Motorola, Northrop Grumman and Tesco

2. Carleton University refrain from investing in other companies involved in violations of international law (for recommended guidelines see Conclusions/Recommendations section of the divestment report)

3. Carleton University work with the entire university community to develop, adopt and implement a broader policy of Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) for its Pension Fund and other investments, through a transparent and effective process.

Download the full report: Carleton University Pension Fund: Complicity in Violations of Human Rights and International Law in the Occupied Palestinian Territories [PDF]

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

SAIA Carleton launches pension divestment campaign > > >

". . . the global movement for boycott, divestment and sanctions, BDS, against Israel presents not only a progressive, anti-racist, sophisticated, sustainable, moral and effective form of civil, non-violent resistance, but a real chance of becoming the political catalyst and moral anchor for a strengthened, reinvigorated international social movement capable of reaffirming the rights of all humans to freedom, equality and dignity and the right of nations to self-determination." --- Omar Barghouti
"


More video's here

Click here for campaign resources & how to get involved

 

"It reminded me so much of what happened to us black people in South Africa. I have seen the humiliation of the Palestinians
at checkpoints and roadblocks, suffering like us when young white police officers prevented us from moving about.
Many South Africans are beginning to recognize the parallels to what we went through." --- Desmond Tutu  




More video's here
 
REPRESSION BY CARLETON ADMINISTRATION

    * Report by CBC Radio One's All In A Day (18 February 2009) [Local MP3]

    * Visit our Campus Repression page for additional information.

    * SAIA has been inundated with letters of support, criticizing the administration's attempts at repressing students' rights to free expression.

          o The first batch of letters is available here.

UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA JOINS CARLETON IN BANNING IAW POSTER

    * In yet another act of repression by the Allan Rock administration, the University of Ottawa has joined Carleton's high administration in banning Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) use of the official Israeli Apartheid Week 2009 poster.

    * Report by CBC News.


Source
---------------------------------------------------------------


Gaza stranded students losing hope

Yousef al-Helou, Press TV, Gaza
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:01:59 GMT

---------------------------------------------------------------

the National

West Bank college boosts settlements

By Jonathan Cook

25-1-2010
NAZARETH, ISRAEL // Ehud Barak, Israel’s defence minister, approved last week the upgrading to university status of a college in a settlement located deep inside the West Bank, a move certain to further undermine Palestinian confidence in the peace process.

The decision, authorising the first Israeli university in Palestinian territory, is expected to entitle the college to significant extra funding, allowing it to expand its student population.

About 11,000 students, most from inside Israel, already attend the college in Ariel, studying amid a population of 18,000 settlers.

The expansion of Ariel, 20km inside the West Bank and close to Nablus, is likely to increase tensions with the US administration of Barack Obama. The White House has demanded a settlement freeze that is being only temporarily and partially honoured by Israel.

The United States and Israel have repeatedly clashed over Israeli plans to extend its separation wall east of Ariel, effectively annexing the settlement and separating the central and northern parts of the West Bank.

Peace groups have been particularly shocked that authorisation for Ariel college’s upgrade came from Mr Barak, leader of the Labor Party. Members of his centre-left faction had previously blocked attempts by right-wing parties to change the college’s status.

Several Israeli academics also warned that it would add fuel to existing campaigns in Europe to boycott Israeli universities, which have been accused of complicity with the occupation.

“This is all about trying to make the settlement of Ariel ‘kosher’,” said Yariv Oppenheimer, head of the Peace Now, an Israeli group that monitors settlement growth. “It helps to reinforce the growing consensus in Israel that Ariel should remain part of Israel permanently.”

Ariel College has grown dramatically since its founding in 1982 as the West Bank campus of Bar Ilan University in Ramat Gan, close to Tel Aviv. On becoming independent in 2004, the college immediately began lobbying for university status. A year later it won the backing of Ariel Sharon, the prime minister then, who described the upgrade as of “great importance” in realising a policy of “strengthening the settlements”.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the current prime minister, declared at the time that a university in Ariel would ensure the settlement “will forever remain part of the state of Israel”.

The upgrade was opposed by Israel’s education oversight body, the Higher Education Council, which threatened to withhold recognition of the college’s degrees.

Nonetheless, in 2007 the college renamed itself the “Ariel University Centre”, a change of status initially endorsed by the government of Ehud Olmert. Under pressure from education officials, however, the decision was reversed on the grounds that only Israeli military authorities in the West Bank – under Mr Barak – could authorise such a change.

Despite opposition from members of his party, the defence minister finally consented last week.

Yossi Sarid, a former chairman of the Higher Education Council, wrote in the Haaretz newspaper on Thursday: “Thanks to [Mr Barak], we will have the only university in the free world whose founders and owners are uniformed officers.”

Mr Barak’s approval suggested the growing power of the far right in Mr Netanyahu’s government, said Anat Matar, a philosophy professor at Tel Aviv Universty.

Two weeks ago, Avigdor Lieberman, the foreign minister and leader of the Yisrael Beiteinu Party, threatened to block all legislative proposals from Labor unless Ariel College’s upgrade was approved.

Yisrael Beiteinu has made the settlement’s expansion a key plank in its platform because Ariel has a large proportion of immigrants from the former Soviet Union, Mr Lieberman’s core constituency.

Alex Miller, an Ariel resident and Yisrael Beiteinu politician, issued a statement last week welcoming the decision as an “important shot of encouragement for the settlements”.

Ron Nachman, the mayor of Ariel, has said he intends to turn the settlement into Israel’s version of Princeton, a US town that has flourished on the back of its Ivy League university.

Mr Barak’s officials said the new status of “university centre” would be a transitional measure before Ariel College became Israel’s eighth fully fledged university, probably within two years.

Ariel College plans to double its intake of students over the next decade, triple the size of its campus and build a new neighbourhood for staff. About 70 per cent of the college’s students are drawn from the Tel Aviv area inside Israel, as well as a small number of Israeli Arab students.

The college displays an Israeli flag in every classroom and requires all students to take at least one course on Judaism or Jewish heritage, usually overseen by settler rabbis.

Ariel, the fourth-largest settlement in the West Bank, is considered by most Israelis as one of the “settlement blocs” that will be annexed to Israel in a peace deal. Palestinians say such an annexation would effectively cut the West Bank in two.

There are widespread fears among Israeli academics that calls for a boycott of Israeli universities will intensify following the Ariel College decision. Yaron Ezrahi, a professor at Hebrew University, called the decision the “academisation of the occupation”.

Amal Jamal, the head of political science at Tel Aviv University, said the upgrade would also highlight the extent to which universities inside Israel colluded with the West Bank college. “There is strong support for the college among some academics at Israeli universities, which co-operate with it in holding conferences, conducting research, supervising doctoral students and teaching,” he said.

A vote by the British lecturers’ union in 2005, in favour of a limited academic boycott of Israel, targeted Bar Ilan University because of its links to Ariel College. Similar boycott motions have been passed annually by the union, though later overturned.

Last November, a Norwegian university, Trondheim, became the first to vote on boycotting Israeli universities, though the motion was rejected.

Ariel College found itself at the centre of a diplomatic row last year when Spain disqualified its researchers from the finals of a competition to design a solar-powered house. Spanish officials said the institution could not participate because it was built on occupied Palestinian land.

Source 

---------------------------------------------------------------

YNet

NORWAY: Twelve points!!! Norway university plans Israel boycott

Yaheli Moran Zelikovich

Rector at University of Bergen says he supports boycott; some lecturers complain to Israeli embassy.

24-1-2010
University of Bergen, among Norway's largest academic institutions, intends to impose an official academic boycott against Israel over what it claims is its apartheid-like conduct, Ynet has learned.
 
The university's management has not yet officially responded to the move or presented its stance on the issue. However, the institution's Rector, Signumd Gronmo, enthusiastically supports the boycott calls.
 
In a debate held last week regarding the question of academic boycotts, the rector boasted that his university does not maintain any ties with Israeli academia and told attendants he wishes to enlist the support of lecturers at the university to realize the boycott call.
 
The rector said that the move has encountered difficulties because of a "handful of objectors" who aim to torpedo the move. However, lecturers at the university who oppose the boycott handed over a complaint regarding the rector's words to Israel's embassy over the weekend.
 
University of Bergen boasts roughly 14,500 students and employsabout 3,200 staff members.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

ISM

Bradford Palestine Solidarity Group hosts Palestine Awareness Week

Bradford Palestine Solidarity Group

Bradford Palestine Solidarity Group

21-1-2010
As Palestinians continue to suffer in occupied Palestine, actions and events are being held in the UK and Europe. The University of Bradford Union (UBU), Palestine Return Centre and Let Palestinians Study are organizing Palestine Awareness Week (PAW) and remembrance in Bradford city. The week of actions coincides with the 1st Anniversary of Gaza War which has been commemorated worldwide. Events will run from 1st February to 5th February.

Palestine Awareness Week starts Monday 1st February with a live graffiti about Palestine. At 5pm there will be a film screening of Occupation 101 open to students and members of public.

The second day will be a day of cultural festivities where Palestinian food, traditional items, and free literature will be provided for people to take away. There will also be presentations of Palestinian cultural history and if possible a performance during lunch. A number of information stalls will be available featuring Interpal, PRC, PSC, United 4 Palestine, Viva Palestina Bradford, Friends of Al-Aqsa, FOSIS – Palestine, Ceasefire, NUS Black Students Campaign, CND, Amnesty International, UBU Peace Society and My Deen Today.

In the evening, we will be setting up a video link with Gaza and Viva Palestina members to talk about their experience while visiting Gaza. They are expected to provide a detailed description of the disastrous humanitarian conditions there.

On Wednesday, the event will start with a video link with IUG students from Gaza to celebrate and announce the twinning with Bradford University. This will be followed by speakers including Professor Paul Rogers and Dr. Mandy Turner from the Bradford Peace Studies department, Anas Altikriti, and other speakers. Their talks will be broken into different topics focusing on the history of the conflict and how it is affecting Palestinians lives and communities. It will end with a question and answer session.

In the evening of Thursday 4th February, an speak-out will be held where participants will be able to share poems and songs about Palestine.

On the last day of PAW we will be hosting a Friday prayer at the University Great hall followed by a fundraiser for Palestine.

Source


---------------------------------------------------------------

YNet

Left warns of global boycott over Ariel U
(niversity Center. H.).

20-1-2010
Leftist members of Knesset and Arab parties protest defense minister's decision first published in Ynet to recognize Ariel College as university. Meretz chairman: Hard to find differences between Barak and Netanyahu. Initiative also advocates establishing university in Nazareth

While Yisrael Beiteinu praised the defense minister's decision to recognize Ariel College as a university, Ehud Barak's decision is sharply criticized among the Left. Meretz Chairman Chaim Oron said that the move is wrought with conceptual and moral bankruptcy.
 
Ynet first published Wednesday that Barak authorized implementation of the decision that stood amidst political clashes within the coalition. At first, the college will be officially recognized as a "university center" as it calls itself currently. In a few years, another discussion will be held about turning the Ariel campus into the eighth university in Israel.
 
Member of Knesset Chaim Oron launched a scathing attack against the defense minister: "Even those of sharp eyesight and fine-tuned capabilities of distinction have for some time had difficulty locating the conceptual differences, even in the smallest nuances, between Barak and Netanyahu. Barak's decision will only accelerate the trends toward isolating Israel from the academic world in the international community."
 
The decision also drew criticism from the Arab parties in the Knesset. MK Ahmad Tibi (United Arab List-Ta'al) said, "Barak continues to permit the infestation of settlements and surrender to Lieberman and Yisrael Beiteinu. Barak's decision will only spur the academic boycott of Israel in the world. (bold H.) The Labor Party proves once again that that it is a barrier to reconciliation between the two nations."
 
MK Hanna Swaid (Hadash) added: "This is a purely political decision that amounts to supporting the settlements under the guise of higher education. It is best for the government, if it wishes to support higher education, to support existing universities and to decide on starting a university in Nazareth."
 
Peace Now also criticized Barak's decision: "The Labor Party has again betrayed its principles and is perpetuating with its own hands the occupation and expansion of the settlements. In a place where there is no democracy, such as the West Bank, there is no place for an academic education founded on the values of justice and equality."
 
On the other hand, Yisrael Beiteinu praised Barak's move and emphasized that "this was done in accordance with the coalition agreement."
 
MK Alex Miller, who serves as chairman of the Student Union in the Knesset and lives in Ariel, praised the decision which, according to him, will strengthen Jewish settlement of the West Bank. "The government gave an important shot of encouragement today to the Jewish settlement in Samaria and to academia in Israel."
 
Amnon Meranda, Yaheli Moran Zelikovich, Sharon Roffe-Ofir, and Efrat Weiss contributed to this report

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Abu Pessoptimist

First illegal university in the world officially acknowledged
Eerste illegale universiteit ter wereld wordt officieel erkend

Het Ariel University Center of  Samaria.


20-1-2010
De IsraĂŤlische minister van Defensie Ehud Barak heeft toegezegd dat hij een beslissing zal erkennen waarbij het College in de nederzetting AriĂŤl officieel universiteit wordt.

De beslissing om het college op te waarderen werd al in 2005 genomen. De toenmalige premier Sharon stond daar vierkant achter, want de beslissing was in zijn woorden 'volledig in lijn' met de opvatting van zijn regering die 'de versterking van de nederzettingen ziet als een van haar doeleinden'.

De beslissing werd toen echter niet uitgevoerd, vooral door verzet van de organen die het hoger onderwijs reguleren. In 2007 besloot het AriĂŤl College, dat geĂŻrriteerd was over het uitstel, zichzelf  AriĂŤl University Center (HaMerkaz haUniversiti AriĂŤl beShomron).te noemen. De toenmalige minister van Onderwijs Juli Tami (Arbeid) noemde dat toen misleiding. Maar Tamirs partijgenoot Barak maakt nu aan die situatie een einde, door te zwichten voor druk van de Israel Beitenu Partij van Avigdor Lieberman, zo bericht Haaretz.

Volgens Ynet wordt het instituut in eerste instantie erkend als Úniversiteits Centrum, en zal in een paar jaar de beslissing vallen dat het Israëls achtste universiteit wordt.

De AriĂŤl Universiteit wordt met dit besluit bij mijn weten de eerste illegale universiteit ter wereld. Links in de Knesset reageerde scherp. Chaim Oron, de leider van de linkse partij Meretz, zei dat zelfs mensen met een uiterst scherp gezichtsvermogen en het vermogen om de kleinste nuances te onderscheiden moeite hebben om ook maar het het geringste verschil in uitgangspunten te ontwaren tussen Ehud Barak (van de scialistische Arbeid) en  Benyamin Netanyahu (van de Likud). Hij waarschuwde dat de beslissing zal leiden tot een versterking van de internationale tendens tot een academische boycot van Israel. Ahmed Tibi van de Verenigde Arabische Lijst sloot zich hierbij aan. Hana Swaid van Hadash zei dat de regering beter een nieuwe universiteit in de (Arabische) stad Nazareth zou kunnen beginnen als zij zo nodig meer universiteiten wilde.. 

Het insituut in AriĂŤl werd in 1982 opgericht als een Likud-venture. President van de Raad van Bestuur is de voormalige Likud-minister van Defensie Moshe Arens. De universiteit streeft ernaar in 2020 een aantal studenten van 20.000 te halen en maakt geen geheim van haar ideologische kleur. Zo meldt zij op haar website:

    As a demonstratively Zionist institution, the University Center has two key requirements: every student must study one course per semester on some aspect of Judaism, Jewish heritage or Land of Israel studies, and the Israeli flag must be displayed in every classroom, laboratory and auditorium on campus.

Mij interesseerde vooral wat er door de sectie political science werd gedoceerd. De website vertelt dat het dit studiejaar een simulatie-project van de diplomatie in het Midden-Oosten is. Ongetwijfeld nuttig. Maar een studie van de mogelijkheden in het kader van de EĂŠnstaats-oplossing komen misschien toch meer in aanmerking.

Bron

---------------------------------------------------------------

Electronic Intifada

BDS. Uphill battle for academic freedom in US universities

Reageer (0)

By Nora Barrows-Friedman

University students demonstrate at Hampshire college. (Hampshire SJP)
11-1-2010
University students demonstrate at Hampshire college. (Hampshire SJP)
In 2009, Hampshire College in Amherst, Massachusetts, became the first American higher educational institution to successfully pressure its Board of Trustees to divest from Israel-tied mutual funds.


The victory came three decades after the college similarly disinvested from funds linked to apartheid South Africa. Across North America, student-led Palestine activism groups have used the methods formulated by the Palestinian-led call for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) "to implement divestment initiatives against Israel, similar to those applied to South Africa in the apartheid era, until Israel meets its obligation to recognize the Palestinian people's inalienable right to self-determination and fully complies with international law." Hampshire College's divestment move was a victory for the students and the administration of Hampshire College, and an inspirational model for hundreds of activism groups across North American campuses.

But despite the expanding and momentous student-led BDS movement, open dialogue around the reality of the situation in occupied Palestine continues to be an uphill battle for many professors inside the classrooms. Educators who openly align with the BDS movement, or speak out against Israeli-US policy in Palestine and the region, are being harassed, threatened, blacklisted, denied tenure and fired from their academic posts.

Denied tenure at Ithaca College

Margo Ramlal-Nankoe, former professor of Sociology at Ithaca College in New York, said that after she started addressing issues of human rights abuses in occupied Palestine -- especially after the start of the second Palestinian intifada -- she was warned by faculty members at the college that she was "risking" her career and "would suffer repercussions from the administration." Ramlal-Nankoe told The Electronic Intifada (EI) that the verbal threats eventually led to alleged racist and sexist attacks, and an open death threat from a faculty member who protested Ramlal-Nankoe's support of a department colleague whose husband was Palestinian. "He [made] a cut-throat gesture with his hand across his neck to me," Ramlal-Nankoe said. She was later denied tenure in 2007. With the tenure review board voting unanimously against her, alleging she did not "fit in the department," faculty colleagues had encouraged the board to "stop hiring third-world elites," and told them that Ramlal-Nankoe's position in the department should instead go to a "native-born American."

"My tenure debacle started in 2005," Ramlal-Nankoe told EI. "I received a strong majority vote in support of my tenure in 2005 from the Sociology Tenure Committee. However, the Dean committed violations in my tenure review and denied me tenure. I appealed the dean's decision and the violations by him and a minority in the Sociology tenure committee. After I won the appeal in April 2006, the provost halted my tenure review and proposed to have a new tenure review in 2007 to correct the violations. This provost was fired soon after his decision."

Ramlal-Nankoe attributed the core of the attacks and her denial of tenure to her support of Ithaca College's Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) group, her organization of a series of Palestine-Israel-themed speaking events on campus (including guests such as Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi, EI's Ali Abunimah, and former UN Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq Denis Halliday) and her public criticism of Israel's ongoing military occupation and violations of human rights in Palestine. The college's Hillel organization was also aggressive in its attacks against on-campus criticism of Israeli policy.

Furthermore, Ramlal-Nankoe alleged that the college's dean of the Humanities and Sciences Department at the time of her tenure denial, Howard Erlich, was "known" for his personal retaliation against faculty and staff who he considered to be "too sympathetic" to the Palestinian cause). She also asserted that Erlich denied funding requests for educational programs on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, classifying them as "anti-Israeli." Ramlal-Nankoe added that at this time, Erlich had stated to her that his son was serving in the Israeli army.

Professor Ramlal-Nankoe has filed a lawsuit against Ithaca College, but it has not been resolved, she said, despite lengthy appeals and publications. Her case is now under investigation by the New York State Human Rights Commission and the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

North Carolina State University case


Film studies professor Terri Ginsberg, similarly fired in 2008 by North Carolina State University (NCSU) in what she says was a punishment for her outspoken criticism of "Zionism, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and US Middle East policy," believes that institutionalized censorship on the Palestine-Israel issue in the academic realm is eerily reminiscent of the McCarthy era of the 1950s and '60s. "So many of the dynamics and methods of discrimination perpetrated against today's scholarly critics of Israel and US Middle East policy derive from and continue, in updated fashion, practices initiated and implemented during that shameful period," she says.

Ginsberg told EI that she was strongly encouraged to apply for the tenure track position at NCSU because of her strong academic service record and favorable student evaluations. But when she began publicly criticizing US-Israeli policy in the Middle East inside and outside the classroom, the administration retaliated against her and she was "punished with partial removal from -- and interference in -- duty, non-renewal of contract and rejection from a tenure-track position." She remarked that since then, her entire professional academic career has been crippled. "I have been veritably blacklisted from the university classroom, ostracized by many of my colleagues, and have been forced to endure unnecessary, unwarranted economic hardship and psychological distress," Ginsberg said.

Ginsberg also filed a legal complaint against NCSU, accusing the administration of discrimination and violation of the North Carolina Constitution, alleging freedom of speech violations and employment prejudice.

Terri Ginsberg's legal counsel, Rima Kapitan, told EI that she expects NCSU to file a response to the lawsuit soon. Kapitan added, "The pervasiveness of restrictions on Palestine-related speech in today's academic climate is shocking, given our Constitution's speech protections and our society's idealistic conception of academia as a bastion of open dialogue and debate." Scare tactics on campuses by administrations and outside Zionist-aligned groups, Kapitan asserted, have resulted in widespread "self-censorship" by untenured or adjunct professors. Combined with a paradigm in which campus administrators and program coordinators take "neutral" stances on the so-called Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Kapitan said that "voices critical of Israel are often either banned or are not permitted unless they are heard alongside Zionist perspectives ...[Academia] is a very dangerous climate for critics of Zionism."

Hostile climate

Working alongside discriminatory academic administrations are right-wing Zionist groups, such as the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) and Campus Watch. Campus Watch in particular has been a strong force behind smear campaigns against university professors such as Terri Ginsberg. Campus Watch describes itself as a "project of the Middle East Forum" that "seeks to have an influence over the future course of Middle East studies" on US college campuses. However, it has been instrumental in vilifying and discrediting distinguished, well-known academic critics of Zionism and Israeli policies such as Norman Finkelstein (denied tenure in June 2007 from DePaul University), and Joel Kovel (fired from Bard College in 2008 in what Koval claimed was a thinly-veiled attempt by the college to categorize the firing as a necessary and nonpolitical budget cut). The Middle East Forum (MEF) is a right-wing think tank based in Philadelphia that "define[s] and promote[s] ... US interests in the Middle East [including] fighting radical Islam; working for Palestinian acceptance of Israel; robustly asserting US interests vis-a-vis Saudi Arabia; and developing strategies to deal with Iraq and contain Iran." Daniel Pipes, director of the MEF and a top neoconservative American academic, was quoted in 2001 by the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs as saying, "the Palestinians are a miserable people ... and they deserve to be."

Ginsberg said that because of the hostile climate within certain academic structures, combined with external pressure by these so-called watchdog groups that seek to silence criticism of Israeli policy, academic workers are made to "self-censor in order to locate and retain albeit meager employment, producing a chilling environment for permanent faculty as well ... Meanwhile, non-conforming Jewish voices and perspectives continue to be held with suspicion and condemnation, not least when they articulate solidarity with the oppressed."

She said that her academic and intellectual work was highly influenced by her Palestine activism, and "greatly enhanced" her ability to make "informed, well-rounded scholarly judgments about the conflict's academic and cultural expression, discern true from false facts about it, and convey them to my students and in my writing -- writing which would also begin to analyze the ensuing, heightened suppression of academic speech critical of Zionism and US Middle East policy."

Slashed from the classroom but undeterred in her political activism, she continues to pursue "scholarly, activist and public intellectual work on Palestine/Israel and on Middle Eastern culture in critical light of US and European policy and attitudes toward the region."

Fight for academic freedom

Ramlal-Nankoe's and Ginsberg's battles come at a time when there are both controversies and victories in the fight for academic freedom. In New York, Nadia Abou El Haj, professor of Anthropology at Barnard, became the focus of an online petition to deny her tenure, organized in part by a Barnard graduate who lives in the illegal Israeli settlement colony of Maale Addumim in the occupied West Bank. Despite external pressure, Barnard granted El Haj full tenure in 2007.

Additionally, Joseph Massad, EI contributor and professor of Modern Arab Politics and Intellectual History at Columbia University, was finally granted tenure in 2009 after a years-long public struggle. Massad was the favored target of pro-Zionist student groups who sought to dismantle his tenure application in 2005 by discrediting him in the media in an attempt to pressure the tenure review board. After Columbia's decision to grant Massad tenure, The New York Post and The Huffington Post, among many other media outlets, ran pieces decrying the outcome. Anna Kelner wrote in The Huffington Post: "[W]hen Columbia University granted tenure to Joseph Massad ... the University jeopardized its long-standing commitment to cultivating and supporting its Jewish student population."

EI also reported on the controversy surrounding Professor William Robinson at UC Santa Barbara, who, after emailing his students with a sharp critique of Israel's attack on the Gaza Strip last winter, was accused by pro-Zionist student groups (backed by the Anti-Defamation League and the Simon Wiesenthal Center) of faculty misconduct; but the case was thrown out by university officials in June of 2009.

Hindering the debate


However, Ramlal-Nankoe and Ginsberg are still worried. They believe that by attacking, censoring and firing professors because of their political activism specifically on this issue, university students are disallowed the broad-based political education necessary to understand the reality in Israel-Palestine.

"The overall situation in this respect will only deteriorate unless, in contrast to the McCarthy era, public and academic outcry, organized protest and transformative praxis are marshaled to bring about a constructive reversal in the current, nefarious trend," Ginsberg observed. "The ... Gaza Freedom March is one such protest, the BDS movement yet another. But we should not, at the same time, ignore troubles on the home-front. Persons dedicated to teaching the history and culture of Palestine justice struggles, for prime instance, must be allowed to do so unhindered by the fear and economic insecurity wrought by a higher educational system in which academic freedom has sadly devolved almost completely into academic 'free enterprise.'"

Professor Margo Ramlal-Nankoe agrees. "The repercussions on faculty who dare to speak out against injustices [are] abysmal and contradict and defeat, in my opinion, the whole purpose of education and critical inquiry. In other words, it is anti-education."

Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University Richard Falk, who is currently the United Nation's Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, said he, too, is concerned about "diverging trends in relation to academic freedom for those who express sharply critical views of Israel [and] Zionism"

"My only advice [to professors], having been attacked for several decades," Falk added, "is to make yourself as invulnerable as possible in relation to the standard expectations that prevail in universities: publish in scholarly venues, teach reliably and with receptivity to diverse opinions, and be a useful colleague, but do not abandon your conscience or your identity as an engaged citizen with critical views."

Falk told EI that the growing BDS movement, specifically within the academic and cultural boycott call against Israeli apartheid, is an effective course of action amongst educators and cultural workers of conscience. "There seems to be diverging trends in relation to academic freedom for those who express sharply critical views of Israel or Zionism," Falk remarked. "On the one side there is growing sympathy for the Palestinian struggle, and this is exhibited by the spreading BDS campaign. On the other side, there are increased efforts by organized Zionist groups to exert covert and overt pressure on university administrations to punish those seen as critics of Israel. As a result, we can expect some inconsistent outcomes in this period."

Currently, according to the US Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (USACBI) campaign, more than 450 American educators and 125 writers, journalists, artists and musicians (including this writer and EI's Ali Abunimah) have signed onto the national statement. The BDS campaign is gaining ground as academics stand up for their beliefs -- and resist the aggressive political pressure -- within American educational institutions.

Nora Barrows-Friedman is the co-host and Senior Producer of Flashpoints, a daily investigative newsmagazine on Pacifica Radio. She is also a correspondent for Inter Press Service. She regularly reports from Palestine, where she also runs media workshops for youth in the Dheisheh refugee camp in the occupied West Bank.


Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

PNN

Gaza student holds graduation party at church



11-1-2010
Palestinian student Berlanty Azzam has never thought that her graduation ceremony would take place in a small church far away from her university and friends.
After spending four years studying in Bethlehem University in the West Bank, and two months before her course finishes, Israeli soldiers kicked her to the Gaza Strip since her ID tells that she is a Gazan.

    "I never imagined that my graduation ceremony will be held in a church with no one from my classmates attending," said the 22-year-old.

    "After all I graduated from Bethlehem University," she said, holding her certificate and posing for pictures with friends at the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza city.

    Berlanty's graduation has a long, two-month story of steadfastness and defiance started when she was sent to Gaza in October 2009.

    Israeli human rights group "Gisha" waged a legal war against the Israeli army to let Berlanty return to finish her studies at the university, but all the attempts came up against a brick wall after the Israeli high court decided that Berlanty should not return to the West Bank.

    This led the Bethlehem University to intervene decisively, taking a decision to provide Berlanty with the classes she needs in Gaza before it is too late.

    Arriving in Gaza to hand Berlanty her certificate, Vice-chancellor of the Bethlehem University Peter Bray, said the university has a commitment to help Berlanty graduate and the only successful step was providing her with classes through the internet and phone.

    "We tried it and it worked out and we are going to use it in case Israel is deporting any of our Gaza students," he proudly said.

    Antonio Franco, a representative of the Pope Archbishop, which sponsors Bethlehem University, has also traveled all way to Gaza to meet Berlanty and grant her bachelor degree in business administration.

    "We came to show support and success," said Bray as he rushed to attend a mass dedicated to his "outstanding student" Berlanty.

    The moments when Archbishop Franco held special mass for Berlanty in the church were very touching. Tears rolled down her cheeks, and many of her friends and relatives in the service shed tears as well.

    "I really wanted to be among my colleagues in such a day," she said as she lit a candle and kneeled after the homily and the readings as peace overwhelmed the church. "I still don't know why I was deported to Gaza."

    According to Israeli media estimations, some 25,000 Palestinians in the West Bank are at risk of being removed from their homes and separated from their families, jobs and studies, simply because they are from Gaza.

    Since 2000, Israel has banned Palestinian students from Gaza from studying at Palestinian universities in the West Bank, except for limited cases like Berlanty, who is a Christian.

    In 2007, when Islamic Hamas movement seized control of Gaza, Israel started to deal with the coastal Strip as a hostile entity since its Islamist rulers are sworn to the destruction of the Jewish state.

    "They did not even let me stay there for a few weeks to finish my studies as if I was a security threat to the state of Israel," Berlanty said, holding many roses from people who came to congratulate.

    "Studying at a Palestinian university is my right and the right of every Palestinian student. I will apply again for Bethlehem University for MA and will legally fight Israel until I enjoy my rights to learn and move freely," she said. 

Source: Xinhua


Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

CAUT Canadian Association of University teachers

Basic Academic Freedoms and Rights Violated in Israel and Palestinian Territories

7-1-2020
Ottawa and Brussels – The academic freedom and professional rights of higher education teaching personnel in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza are increasingly under assault as a result of the continuing political conflict in the region, according to a report released today by Education International and the Canadian Association of University Teachers.

“Both Israeli and Palestinian academics are facing greater pressure from outside political influences and from within the academy itself,” says David Robinson, associate executive director of CAUT and author of the report. “There are clear and consistent violations of internationally recognized academic rights as detailed in UNESCO’s 1997 Recommendation Concerning the Status of Higher Education Teaching Personnel.”

The study, The Status of Higher Education Teaching Personnel in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, found that the strong polarization of opinions within Israel over the political conflict between Israelis and Palestinians has generated several prominent academic freedom controversies in recent years. In addition, proposed changes to the governance of Israeli universities threaten to weaken institutional autonomy and academic freedom.

However, it is in the Palestinian territories that the report finds the most serious violations of basic academic freedoms and rights.

“Many of the violations of academic freedom in the West Bank and Gaza are a result of the Israeli occupation,” says Robinson. “Israel unquestionably has legitimate security concerns and has a right and responsibility to defend its citizens. However, as documented in the report, the near complete blockade of the Gaza Strip and the tight travel restrictions imposed on residents within the West Bank go beyond what can be reasonably justified and have seriously disrupted the work of Palestinian scholars.”

Limits imposed on freedom of movement within the Palestinian territories make it difficult and in many cases impossible for Palestinian academics and students to attend conferences or study abroad, and have forced local universities to shut down early and to close entirely for extended periods. There are bans on the import of certain research equipment and materials needed to pursue scholarly activities, and many academics face arbitrary arrest and detention by both Israeli and Palestinian authorities.

The report argues that the restrictions on academic freedom are undermining the democratic development of the West Bank and Gaza and are frustrating the peace process.

“Israeli and Palestinian universities and colleges have a critical role to play in helping find peaceful solutions to the conflict,” says Monique Fouilhoux, deputy general secretary of Education International. “But they can only do this if their scholars are free to express their views and debate controversial matters without fear of recrimination.”

The report recommends ways that higher education associations and unions worldwide can provide expertise and support to Israeli and Palestinian colleagues to help improve their conditions of employment and assert their professional rights as recognized by the UNESCO Recommendation.

Education International is the global union federation representing more than 30 million teachers and education workers in 172 countries and territories.

The Canadian Association of University Teachers represents more than 67,000 academic and general staff at colleges and universities across Canada.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Electronic Intifada

Press release

United States Campaign for an Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, 24 December 2009

The following press release was issued by the United States Campaign for an Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (USACBI) on 23 December 2009:


23-12-2009
27 December 2009 marks the one-year anniversary of the beginning of "Operation Cast Lead," Israel's 22-day assault on the captive population of Gaza, which killed 1,400 people, one third of them children, and injured more than 5,300.

During this war on an impoverished, mostly refugee population, Israel targeted civilians, using internationally-proscribed white phosphorous bombs, deprived them of power, water and other essentials, and sought to destroy the infrastructure of Palestinian civil society, including hospitals, administrative buildings and UN facilities. It targeted with peculiar consistency educational institutions of all kinds: the Islamic University of Gaza, the Ministry of Education, the American International School, at least ten UNRWA schools, one of which was sheltering internally displaced Palestinian civilians with nowhere to flee, and tens of other schools and educational facilities.

While world leaders have tragically failed to come to Gaza's help, civilians everywhere are rallying to show their solidarity with the Palestinian people, with anniversary vigils taking place this week in New York, Washington DC, Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Boston, Los Angeles, and many more cities and towns in the US and world-wide.

The United States Campaign for an Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel was formed in the immediate aftermath of Operation Cast Lead, bringing together educators of conscience who were unable to stand by and watch in silence Israel's indiscriminate assault on the Gaza Strip and its educational institutions. Today, over 500 US-based academics, authors, artists, musicians, poets and other arts professionals have endorsed our call. Our academic endorsers include postcolonial critics and transnational feminists Chandra Talpade Mohanty and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Indigenous scholars J. Kehaulani Kauanui and Andrea Smith, philosopher Judith Butler, Black studies scholars Cedric Robinson, Fred Moten, evolutionary biologist Robert Trivers, and intellectual historian Joseph Massad.

"Cultural workers" who have endorsed our call include well known author Barbara Ehrenreich, The Electronic Intifada cofounder Ali Abunimah, poets Adrienne Rich and Lisa Suhair Majjaj, International Solidarity Movement cofounder and documentary filmmaker Adam Shapiro, Jordan Flaherty of Left Turn Magazine, and Adrienne Maree Brown of the Ruckus Society.

Among the 34 organizations supporting our mission are and the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, the Green Party, Code Pink, INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence, Artists Against Apartheid and Teachers Against the Occupation.
The Advisory Board of the United States Campaign for an Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (USACBI) has grown to include Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Hamid Dabashi, Lawrence Davidson, Bill Fletcher Jr., Glen Ford, Mark Gonzales, Marilyn Hacker, Edward Herman, Annemarie Jacir, J. Kehaulani Kauanui, Robin Kelley, Ilan Pappe, James Petras, Vijay Prashad, Andrenne Rich, Michel Shehadeh and Lisa Taraki.

Israeli academics listed among the organization's International Endorsers have also joined us, including Emmanuel Farjoun, Hebrew University; Rachel Giora, Tel Aviv University; Anat Matar, Tel Aviv University; Kobi Snitz, Technion; and Ilan Pappe now at Exeter.

The USACBI Mission Statement calls for a boycott of Israeli academic and cultural institutions in support of an appeal by the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel. Individual Israelis are not targeted by the boycott.

Specifically, supporters are asked to:

(1) Refrain from participation in any form of academic and cultural cooperation, collaboration or joint projects with Israeli institutions that do not vocally oppose Israeli state policies against Palestine;

(2) Advocate a comprehensive boycott of Israeli institutions at the national and international levels, including suspension of all forms of funding and subsidies to these institutions;

(3) Promote divestment and disinvestment from Israel by international academic institutions;

(4) Work toward the condemnation of Israeli policies by pressing for resolutions to be adopted by academic, professional and cultural associations and organizations;

(5) Support Palestinian academic and cultural institutions directly without requiring them to partner with Israeli counterparts as an explicit or implicit condition for such support.

This boycott, modeled upon the global boycott, divestment and sanctions movement that put an end to South African apartheid, is to continue until Israel meets its obligation to recognize the Palestinian people's inalienable right to self-determination and fully complies with the precepts of international law by:

1. Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall;

2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and

3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.

Source


---------------------------------------------------------------

Gaza Freedom March


Contact: Maryam Khan, Student Press Coordinator
925.640.5376
maryamkhan31@gmail.com
www.gazafreedommarch.org


100 International Students to Participate in International Delegation


1,000 Delegates from 42 Countries

18-12-2009
Over one hundred students from around the world will be traveling to Gaza this winter to participate in the Gaza Freedom March. On December 31, over 1,000 international delegates will join Palestinians in a non-violent march from Northern Gaza to the Israeli border calling for an end to the siege. The march is a historic initiative to break the ongoing US-backed Israeli blockade against Gaza. 

The group of international students plans to meet with their peers at Gazan universities who will have a chance to share their experiences as youth in the war torn territory. Students in America have been fundraising not only to pay for their travel expenses but also to bring thousands of dollars of aid into the strip. Nuha Masri, a student from California, sold baked goods at school in order to get to the march, which will be her first trip back to Palestine since her family left when she was eleven years old. Julia Hurley, a student in New Jersey, fundraised over 12,000 dollars to bring aid to Palestinian youth suffering as a result of the blockade. For Ali Glenesk, a student at UC Berkeley and American student coordinator for the march, this will be her third trip to Gaza. She states that, “Upon visiting Gaza, the realities of the siege cannot be denied. It is imperative that Americans work to lift the siege because our tax dollars are going to support it.” 

Deema Mishal, a medical student, Gazan peace activist, and the Palestinian student coordinator for the march, has been working closely with Glenesk to organize the student delegation. She firmly believes that the march is a means to highlight Gaza’s condition as a whole. She says that, “we have to change the reality that is happening here now. The people in this land deserve to have a normal life without all the fears that we wake up with everyday, we only want peace.” Mishal also states that “this is the first time ever that the Palestinians come together in such large numbers along with internationals to say no to repression.” Inside Gaza, excitement is growing. Representatives of all aspects of civil society, including students, professors, refugee groups, unions, women's organizations, and NGOs, have been busy organizing and it is estimated that at least 50,000 Palestinians will participate. 

The iDocs Group in San Francisco in cooperation with The Media Group in Gaza City has begun filming a feature length documentary about the march. The film will show how both Palestinians and internationals prepare for the march and follow them throughout their experience. Producers plan to highlight Mishal and Glenesk, and the student movement they have begun to build across borders. Glenesk explains her continued involvement, saying, “I guess I keep going back because you simply can't deny or turn away from the injustice once you've been there and seen it. The heartwarming thing about the student group though, is that we can spend the day witnessing and talking about things that no human being should ever have to experience, but then later be sitting around playing guitar and having fun. There is hope in that.”

For more information see www.gazafreedommarch.org

Deema Mishal dm.meshal@gmail.com

Ali Glenesk ali.glenesk@gmail.com

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------


Sabah blog


Rules of human decency apply to Israelis too



A dose of their own (academic) medicine might help the message sink in


Berlanty Azzam, 21,was handcuffed and blindfolded

Berlanty Azzam, 21,was handcuffed and blindfolded


By Stuart Littlewood


11-12-2009
Poor Berlanty. What did she do to deserve this crushing blow to her hopes and life chances?

The Israeli High Court has denied her justice – again – and prevented Berlanty Azzam returning to Bethlehem University for the final few weeks to complete her degree.

On 28 October this Christian student at the Vatican-sponsored Bethlehem University was abducted by the IDF, "the world's most moral army", after attending a job interview in Ramalla, then blindfolded and handcuffed and dumped in Gaza. She had lived in the West Bank since 2005 after being granted a permit.

There was only one kind of permit available in 2005 – an entry permit to Israel. But the Israeli State claimed that this permit was insufficient and Berlanty should have obtained some other permit, even though the State admits that none existed at the time.

State representatives took her permit, a key piece of evidence, and never produced it to the Court. After six weeks of double-talk the Court accepted the State's claim that Berlanty entered the West Bank illegally. We hear a lot about how independent Israel's justice system is. Here's proof, if any were needed, that it is simply a tool of the military.

To avoid accusations that her residence was not Bethlehem, Berlanty had for the last four years resisted the temptation to return to Gaza and visit her folks. She and her parents submitted numerous applications to change the Gaza address recorded on her identity card to her actual place of residence, Bethlehem, but to no avail. Israel controls the Palestinian population registry and refuses to register changes in address from the Gaza Strip to the West Bank – another example of how Gazans are effectively imprisoned.

This, of course, is in breach of her human rights. The West Bank and the Gaza Strip are internationally recognized as one integral territory and under international law everyone has the right to freely choose their place of residence within a single territory. In 1999 Israel and the Palestinian Authority signed an agreement establishing a 28 mile road corridor giving Palestinians safe passage between the two parts of Palestine – yet another empty gesture.

"We are disappointed that the Israeli military and High Court have interfered with the Church's educational mission at Bethlehem University by denying Berlanty to be brought back to Bethlehem to complete her studies," said Brother Peter Bray, the Vice Chancellor, on hearing the Court ruling. "We realize that Berlanty is one of the many people in Gaza who suffer so unjustly."

Indeed. Since 2000 Israel has implemented a sweeping ban preventing youngsters from Gaza from studying at Palestinian universities in the West Bank. A 2007 High Court decision determined that students from Gaza wishing to study in the West Bank should be allowed to do so "in cases that would have positive humanitarian implications". (bold H.)

However, to the best of her legal team's knowledge, since that judgment was handed down Israel hasn't issued a single entry permit. Only last summer 12 students from Gaza were refused permits to study at Bethlehem University. Back in the late 1990s, about 1,000 students from Gaza studied in the West Bank, most of them in disciplines that are not offered in the Gaza Strip.

Like Berlanty, an estimated 25,000 people currently living in the West Bank have been declared "illegal" by Israel solely because the address on their identity card is in the Gaza Strip. Some of them have lived in the West Bank for decades but Israel simply does not recognize their right to be there. They are extremely limited in their daily movements and live in fear of being detained and 'deported', just as Berlanty was. Consequently they have very limited opportunities for employment, business and studies. This policy not only breaches Israel's obligations under international accords to treat the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as a "single territorial entity" but it also chokes any prospect of healthy development in Palestinian society.

It is no use pretending that things will change until other countries give Israel a dose of their own medicine. How does the Berlanty case and the thousands like it sit with the great and the good who piously reject the idea of an academic boycott against Israel? (bold H.)

All political parties fight against such a for muddle-headed reasons. The recent Channel 4 Dispatches programme uncovered the influence of the Israel lobby and its money on the Conservative Party. Another particularly obnoxious group that's hopelessly out of touch with reality is the Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel. At their party's conference they tabled a motion squashing an academic boycott, saying that "Israeli universities are centres of free debate and discussion and that the universities contain Jews, Muslims, Christians, Israelis and Palestinians. Furthermore a boycott does nothing to resolve a negotiated solution to the Israel/Palestine conflict and is indeed counter-productive as it discourages dialogue." This motion against the boycott was passed with an overwhelming majority.

The aim of the Liberal Democrats Friends of Israel is to "maximise support for the State of Israel within the party and Parliament" and "encourage a broad understanding of Israel's unique political position as the only democracy in the Middle East".

Their stated purpose is….

– To influence the Party's Middle East policy so it places a high priority on Israel's right to peace and security.

- To provide parliamentarians with briefing material for parliamentary debates, questions to Ministers and public appearances.

- To rebut attacks on Israel in the media, Parliament and the Party.

- To liaise with Israeli politicians and Government.

- To arrange and accompany LDFI delegations to Israel.

- To keep in regular contact with the Embassy of Israel.

In other words they act as a prop within the British parliament for this racist military regime.

Such blind allegiance and bizarre conduct contribute to the tragedy of Berlanty and countless other Palestinian youngsters. Without these beacons of misplaced support across the Western world lawless Israel would be sunk.

* Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the plight of the Palestinians under occupation. Read other articles by Stuart, or visit Stuart's website.


Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Electronic Intifada

Sussex University students vote to boycott Israeli goods

6-11-2009
The following press release was issued by the University of Sussex Students' Union on 5 November 2009:

Students at the University of Sussex, England have voted to boycott Israeli goods. The decision follows the Palestinian call for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel, which calls upon the Israeli state to respect international law and end the occupation of Palestine.

In a campus-wide referendum, 56 percent of students voted in favor of the boycott.

The referendum was held by the University of Sussex Students' Union (USSU), which represents the institution's 11,000 students.

Goods from Israel will no longer be stocked in USSU shops on the university campus, and USSU will be lobbying the university administration to observe the boycott.

Tom Wills, USSU President, said "Israel has broken more UN resolutions than any other state. No other Western-backed democracy has committed such egregious violations of international law, but the international community has failed to hold Israel to account.

"Sussex was one of the first universities to boycott South Africa during apartheid, and we hope that this will help kickstart an international movement on a similar scale to put pressure on Israel to end its oppression of the Palestinian people.

"We call on students at other universities to table boycott motions in their own unions."

Earlier this year the Israeli attack on Gaza triggered a resurgence in student activism in the UK, with a wave of sit-in protests at universities including Sussex. The student boycott comes after the Trades Union Congress (TUC) backed a boycott of Israeli settlement goods in September.

USSU currently also boycotts Coca-Cola and Nestle in protest at unethical business practices by those corporations.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Palestine Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel

Guidelines for Applying the International Academic Boycott of Israel


1-10-2009
Since its founding in 2004, PACBI has advocated a boycott of Israeli academic and cultural institutions, based on the premise that these institutions are complicit in the system of oppression that has denied Palestinians their basic rights guaranteed by international law. 

This position is in line with the authoritative call by the Palestinian Council for Higher Education for "non-cooperation in the scientific and technical fields between Palestinian and Israeli universities"[1].  Academic institutions in particular are part of the ideological and institutional scaffolding of the Zionist colonial project in Palestine, and as such are deeply implicated in maintaining the structures of domination over the Palestinian people.  Since its founding, the Israeli academy has cast its lot with the hegemonic political-military establishment in Israel, and notwithstanding the efforts of a handful of principled academics, carries on business-as-usual in support of the status quo.

The beginnings of the academic boycott of Israel can be traced to 2002, the year in which Israel launched its destructive assault upon Palestinian cities, towns, refugee camps and villages, targeting the institutions of Palestinian society and wreaking havoc on communities, residential neighborhoods, and urban infrastructure. The April 2002 statement by 120 European academics and researchers urging the adoption of a moratorium on EU and European Science Foundation support for Israel was followed by a number of pro-boycott initiatives in the same year by academics in the USA, France, Norway, and Australia. Particularly noteworthy have been the annual congresses of UK academics’ unions, where boycott-related resolutions have been debated and passed since 2002. PACBI’s key partner in the UK, BRICUP [2] has been instrumental in the ongoing struggle to popularize the academic boycott in the union movement in the UK and beyond.

In October 2003, the first Palestinian Call for Boycott was issued by a group of Palestinian academics and intellectuals in the diaspora and the occupied Palestinian Territory.  Building on all previous boycott initiatives, PACBI issued its Call for an Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel in Ramallah in 2004, providing the Palestinian reference for a steadily growing and sustainable institutional academic boycott effort throughout the world.  The lethal Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip in December 2008-January 2009 served as a catalyst for further activism, and the period since then has witnessed a tremendous growth of initiatives in the spirit of BDS and targeting Israeli academic institutions.  Such efforts have come from Australia, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Scotland, Lebanon, Spain and the United States.  Particularly encouraging has been the founding of the US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural boycott of Israel (USACBI), inspired by PACBI and basing itself upon the PACBI Call.

During five years of intensive work with partners in several countries to promote the academic boycott against Israel, PACBI has examined many academic projects and events, assessing the applicability of the boycott criteria to them and, accordingly, has issued open letters, statements or advisory opinions on them. Based on this experience and in response to the burgeoning demand for PACBI’s specific guidelines on applying the academic boycott to diverse projects, from conferences to exchange programs and research efforts, the Campaign lays out below unambiguous, consistent and coherent criteria and guidelines that specifically address the nuances and particularities of the academy.

These guidelines are mainly intended to assist academics around the world in adhering to the Palestinian call for boycott, as a contribution towards establishing a just peace in our region.  Similar guidelines for the cultural boycott have been issued by PACBI [3].

Academic Boycott Guidelines


Inspired by the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa as well as the long tradition of civil resistance against settler-colonialism in Palestine, the PACBI Call [4] urges academics and cultural workers “to comprehensively and consistently boycott all Israeli academic and cultural institutions as a contribution to the struggle to end Israel‘s occupation, colonization and system of apartheid, by applying the following:

1. Refrain from participation in any form of academic and cultural cooperation, collaboration or joint projects with Israeli institutions;

2. Advocate a comprehensive boycott of Israeli institutions at the national and international levels, including suspension of all forms of funding and subsidies to these institutions;

3. Promote divestment and disinvestment from Israel by international academic institutions;

4. Work toward the condemnation of Israeli policies by pressing for resolutions to be adopted by academic, professional and cultural associations and organizations;

5. Support Palestinian academic and cultural institutions directly without requiring them to partner with Israeli counterparts as an explicit or implicit condition for such support.”

Before discussing the various categories of academic activities that fall under the boycott call, and as a general overriding rule, it is important to stress that virtually all Israeli academic institutions, unless proven otherwise, are complicit in maintaining the Israeli occupation and denial of basic Palestinian rights, whether through their silence, actual involvement in justifying, whitewashing or otherwise deliberately diverting attention from Israel’s violations of international law and human rights, or indeed through their direct collaboration with state agencies in the design and commission of these violations.  Accordingly, these institutions, all their activities, and all the events they sponsor or support must be boycotted.  Events and projects involving individuals explicitly representing these complicit institutions should be boycotted, by the same token.  Mere institutional affiliation to the Israeli academy is therefore not a sufficient condition for applying the boycott.

While an individual’s academic freedom should be fully and consistently respected in this context, an individual academic, Israeli or not, cannot be exempt from being subject to boycotts that conscientious citizens around the world (beyond the scope of the PACBI boycott criteria) may call for in response to what is widely perceived as a particularly offensive act or statement by the academic in question (such as direct or indirect incitement to violence; justification -- an indirect form of advocacy -- of war crimes and other grave violations of international law; racial slurs; actual participation in human rights violations; etc.).  At this level, Israeli academics should not be automatically exempted from due criticism or any lawful form of protest, including boycott; they should be treated like all other offenders in the same category, not better or worse. 

The following guidelines may not be completely exhaustive and certainly do not preempt, replace or void other, common-sense rationales for boycott, particularly when a researcher, speaker, or event is shown to be explicitly justifying, advocating or promoting war crimes, racial discrimination, apartheid, suppression of fundamental human rights and serious violations of international law.

Based on the above, PACBI urges academics, academics’ associations/unions and academic institutions around the world, where possible and as relevant, to boycott and/or work towards the cancellation or annulment of events, activities, agreements, or projects that promote the normalization of Israel in the global academy, whitewash Israel’s violations of international law and Palestinians rights, or violate the boycott.  Specifically, the Palestinian academic boycott against Israel applies to the following events, activities, or situations:

1. Academic events (such as conferences, symposia, workshops, book and museum exhibits) convened or co-sponsored by Israeli institutions.  All academic events, whether held in Israel or abroad, and convened or co-sponsored by Israeli academic institutions or their departments and institutes, deserve to be boycotted on institutional grounds.  These boycottable activities include panels and other activities sponsored or organized by Israeli academic bodies or associations at international conferences outside Israel.  Importantly, they also include the convening in Israel of meetings of international bodies and associations.

2. Institutional cooperation agreements with Israeli universities or research institutes.  These agreements, concluded between international and Israeli universities, typically involve the exchange of faculty and students and, more importantly, the conduct of joint research.  Many of these schemes are sponsored and funded by the European Union (in the case of Europe), and independent and government foundations elsewhere.  For example, the five-year EU Framework programs, in which Israel has been the only non-European participant, have been crucial to the development of research at Israeli universities.  European academic activists have been campaigning for the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement since 2002; under this Agreement, Israeli and European universities exchange academic staff and students and engage in other activities, mainly through the Erasmus Mundus and Tempus schemes [5].  It should be noted that Israel is in violation of the terms of this Agreement, particularly of the second article [6].

3. Study abroad schemes in Israel for international students. These programs are usually housed at Israeli universities and are part of the Israeli propaganda effort, designed to give international students a “positive experience” of Israel.  Publicity and recruitment for these schemes are organized through students’ affairs offices or academic departments (such as Middle East and international studies centers) at universities abroad.

4. Addresses and talks at international venues by official representatives of Israeli academic institutions such as presidents and rectors.

5. Special honors or recognition granted to official representatives of Israeli academic institutions (such as the bestowal of honorary degrees and other awards) or to Israeli academic or research institutions. Such institutions and their official representatives are complicit and as such should be denied this recognition.

6. Palestinian/Arab-Israeli collaborative research projects or events, especially those funded by the various EU and international grant-giving bodies.  It is widely known that the easiest route to securing a research grant for a Palestinian academic is to apply with an Israeli partner.  This is a case of politically motivated research par excellence, and contributes to enhancing the legitimacy of Israeli institutions as centers of excellence instead of directly and independently strengthening the research capacity of Palestinian institutions. The argument that “science is above politics” is often used to justify such collaborations.  In PACBI’s view, no normal collaboration between the institutions of the oppressor and the oppressed, or indeed between the academics of the oppressor and oppressed can be possible while the structures of domination remain in place.  In fact, such projects do nothing to challenge the status quo and contribute to its endurance.  As an example, Palestinian/Arab-Israeli research efforts in the field of water and environment take as given the apartheid reality; tackling Palestinian/Arab and Israeli water and environmental “problems” as commensurate, without recognizing the apartheid reality, only contributes to the continuation of that reality.

As in the cultural field, events and projects (such as those involving educators, psychologists, or historians) involving Palestinians and/or Arabs and Israelis that promote “balance” between the “two sides” in presenting their respective narratives or “traumas,” as if on par, or are otherwise based on the false premise that the colonizers and the colonized, the oppressors and the oppressed, are equally responsible for the “conflict,” are intentionally deceptive, intellectually dishonest and morally reprehensible.  Such events and projects, often seeking to encourage dialogue or “reconciliation between the two sides” without addressing the requirements of justice, promote the normalization and perpetuation of oppression and injustice.  All such events and projects that bring Palestinians and/or Arabs and Israelis together, unless based on unambiguous recognition of Palestinian rights and framed within the explicit context of opposition to occupation and other forms of Israeli oppression of the Palestinians, are strong candidates for boycott.  Other factors that PACBI takes into consideration in evaluating such events and projects are the sources of funding, the design of the project or event, the objectives of the sponsoring organization(s), the participants, and similar relevant factors.

7. Research and development activities in the framework of agreements or contracts between the Israeli government and other governments or institutions.  Researchers in such projects are based at American, European or other universities.  Examples include the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF), an institution established by the US and Israeli governments in 1972 to sponsor research by Israelis and Americans, and the “Eureka Initiative,” a European inter-governmental initiative set up in 1985 that includes Israel as the only non-European member.

8. Research and development activities on behalf of international corporations involving contracts or other institutional agreements with departments or centers at Israeli universities.

9. Institutional membership of Israeli associations in world bodies.  While challenging such membership is not easy, targeted and selective campaigns demanding the suspension of Israeli membership in international forums contribute towards pressuring the state until it respects international law.  Just as South Africa’s membership was suspended in world academic--among other--bodies during apartheid, so must Israel’s.

10. Publishing in or refereeing articles for academic journals based at Israeli universities.  These journals include those published by international associations but housed at Israeli universities.  Efforts should be made to re-locate the editorial offices of these journals to universities outside Israel.

11. Advising on hiring or promotion decisions at Israeli universities through refereeing the work of candidates [7], or refereeing research proposals for Israeli funding institutions.  Such services, routinely provided by academics to their profession, must be withheld from complicit institutions.

PACBI

www.PACBI.org

PACBI@PACBI.org

Notes:

[1] The Palestinian Council for Higher Education, composed of heads of Palestinian universities and representatives from the community, has, since the 1990’s, adhered to its principled position of non-cooperation with Israeli universities until Israel ends its occupation; this position was reiterated in a statement of thanks to the UK academic union NATFHE in 2006: http://www.mohe.gov.ps/ENG/news/index.html#7
[2] www.BRICUP.org.uk
[3] http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=1045
[4] http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=869
[5] See http://ec.europa.eu/education/external-relation-programmes/doc70_en.htm  and http://ec.europa.eu/education/external-relation-programmes/doc72_en.htm 
[6] http://www.bdsmovement.net/?q=node/179
[7] In 2002, more than 700 European academics signed this declaration:  "I can no longer in good conscience continue to cooperate with official Israeli institutions, including universities. I will attend no scientific conferences in Israel, and I will not participate as referee in hiring or promotion decisions by Israeli universities, or in the decisions of Israeli funding agencies. I will continue to collaborate with, and host, Israeli scientific colleagues on an individual basis."  (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2002/jul/08/highereducation.israel)

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

AIC

The Economy of the Occupation 23-24: Academic Boycott of Israel

Academic Boycott of Israel and the Complicity of Israeli Academic Institutions in Occupation of Palestinian Territories




























Academic Boycott of Israel and the Complicity of Israeli Academic Institutions in Occupation of Palestinian Territorie
s


20-10-2009
The idea of an academic boycott of Israel first emerged in 2002 as part of the growing boycott and divestment campaign against Israel, itself a part of the struggle against the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories and the violation of Palestinian human and national rights.

Compared to other types of boycott, the academic boycott has gathered a relative amount of widespread support amongst academic unions and organizations, primarily in Great Britain. Not surprisingly, this relative success has stirred a public debate and opposition to the boycott, mostly by pro-Israeli organizations and academics. The campaign for academic boycott has wavered under these pressures and various degrees and measures of boycott have since been approved and then often canceled by academic organizations. The arguments in favor of this kind of boycott have relied largely on the facts of the Israeli occupation and the idea of pressuring Israel through its academic world; often, they have not utilised details relating to the specific academic institutions that they call to boycott.

Through this report, however, the Alternative Information Center (AIC) aims to inform and empower the debate on an academic boycott by giving information not on Israeli violence and violations of international law and human rights, but on the part played in the Israeli occupation by the very academic institutions in question. The report demonstrates that Israeli academic institutions have not opted to take a neutral, apolitical position toward the Israeli occupation but to fully support the Israeli security forces and policies toward the Palestinians, despite the serious suspicions of crimes and atrocities hovering over them. Any who argue either for or against an academic boycott against Israeli institutions, we believe, should know and consider not only facts regarding the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), but also the ways in which the Israeli academic institutions make political choices and actively take sides in the ongoing conflict.

This report deals with relevant facts about the connections between Israeli academic institutions and the occupation. It is doubtful that in the process of researching this report all facts relevant to the subject were uncovered, especially since some of the economic connections between academic institutions and private companies are actively hidden by the parties involved. The involvement of Israeli academic institutions in the occupation takes many forms and scopes, and not all Israeli academic institutions can be said to be involved on the same scale. However, all main Israeli academic institutions are involved in the occupation. Indeed, all major Israeli academic institutions, certainly the ones with the strongest international connections, were found to provide unquestionable support to Israel’s occupation. Some of the details depicted in this report are evidence of blunt and direct support to the occupation while others are more minor details, which, nonetheless, provide a clear indication of the political stance taken by academic institutions.

It should be noted that the Israeli security forces are the prime proponents of the occupation and therefore any aid given to them is considered here as support for the occupation. It is probable that universities in other countries may also occasionally support the local security forces. However the situation of the Israeli army is unlike that of other armies around the world and no support given to the Israeli security agencies can be defined as “neutral.”

To read the whole booklet, click here *.pdf.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Electronic Intifada

Palestinian students at Israeli universities support academic boycott


Open letter, Abnaa el-Balad, Iqraa Student Association, National Democratic Assembly, 11 November 2009

11-11-2009
The following open letter to the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim was issued on 9 November 2009 by Arab students at Israeli universities. The university's board is due to consider a measure supporting the academic boycott of Israel:

We are Arab students at the Israeli universities writing to you in support of the proposed academic boycott of Israeli academic institutions. We believe that the boycott is timely and hopefully will help in upholding moral values of fairness, justice and equality which have been sorely missed in our region.

While the reason for the boycott is rightly what has been going on in the 1967 occupied territories [West Bank and Gaza Strip], we propose another angle which affirms the need for boycott, namely our daily experience as Arabs in Israeli institutions. We are the lucky ones who have been able to pursue our studies in institutions of higher education, to which we arrived against great odds. Only very few among our generation have been qualified to attend universities due to the state's discriminatory policies. Our schools mostly lack the basic facilities needed for education, and the curriculum is structured to serve the state's goal in socializing the pupils for self-estrangement. It contains very little, if any at all, on our history and culture. Additionally, it aims to erase our historical memory and promote the official policy line of divide and rule. In short, it is modeled on curriculums that dark regimes, like apartheid South Africa, have used to indoctrinate rather than educate. We arrive to universities with this "educational" baggage.

The idea that Israeli universities adhere to the values of free academic institutions, where academic freedom, objectivity and meritocracy prevail, is widely accepted in the West. From our experience we attest -- and indeed prove beyond doubt -- that this is not the case. In recent years Israeli universities have changed the criteria of acceptance to various faculties in order -- as a certain president of an Israeli university put it -- to prevent large number of undesirable (i.e. Arab) students from attending prestigious faculties such as medicine and natural sciences. Moreover, lecturers who presented findings which are at odds with the official ideology -- such as Ilan Pappe and Neve Gordon -- are bullied and harassed or forced to resign. Meanwhile raw racist statements by many lecturers are considered by the administrations of the universities as benign or even objective statements. For example, recently Dr. Dan Scheuftan stated in one of his lectures: "The Arabs are the biggest failure in the history of the human race ... there's nothing under the sun that's more screwed up than the Palestinians;" "Throughout the Arab world, people fire guns at weddings in order to prove that they have at least one thing that's hard and in working order that can shoot."

It goes without saying that none of these lecturers has ever been disciplined. Moreover, foreign students are warned by the security authorities of Haifa University not to visit Arab villages or towns.

Although some Israeli universities -- such as the University of Haifa -- pride themselves on promoting "co-existence," nothing is further from the truth than this. We are prevented from forming our [own] (i.e. Arab) students union, and racial discrimination against us -- under the pretext of not serving in the army -- is widely practiced in the granting of scholarships, as well as in the provision of housing at the universities' residential halls. This is particularly grave as the universities are located in Jewish towns, and Arab students face many obstacles and hardships in finding appropriate housing due to prevailing prejudices and anti-Arab sentiments in Israeli society.

Yet, the restrictions imposed on our freedom of expression are more stifling. We are not allowed to express our collective sentiments or ideas publicly. It is quite often that our public gatherings are not only violently interrupted by extreme right-wing Jewish students, but also in various occasions the universities called on the police to intervene. In several occasions, as during our peaceful demonstration at Haifa University against the war on Gaza, the police sent in large number of its special units which are infamous for their brutality. Needless to say that they do the job they are trained for. Moreover, the universities collaborate with the internal security services (the feared Shin Bet) and provide them with names of the activists among the students who are regularly summoned, investigated and threatened.

In the end, we are hopeful that you will take a decision which reaffirms the true meaning of human values, and provide a proof that racism, religious tribalism, obfuscation and disregard for human dignity are no longer tolerated.

Undersigned:

Abnaa el-Balad - The Student Movement
Iqraa Student Association - Islamic Movement
National Democratic Assembly (NDA) - The Student Movement


Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Occupation Magazine

Israelis to Trondheim: Boycott the Israeli Academy Now!

On Thursday 12 November Trondheim University in Norway will vote on a resolution proposal calling for institutional sanctions against the Israeli acedemia. The right wing Israeli lobby is trying hard to stop this initiative. Please send mail in support of the boycott proposal, to University officials listed below. You can use the letter below, sent by the Israeli BDS support group, or send your own letter.

BOYCOTT! Supporting the Palestinian BDS call from within
http://www.boycottisrael.info/

Boycott the Israeli Academy Now! - Open Letter from Israeli Citizens to the Board of Governors of Trondheim University

Dear Trondheim University Officials,

We, Israeli citizens, activists and supporters of BOYCOTT! Supporting the Palestinian BDS call from within, an Israeli group in support of boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel, applaud faculty members at the University of Trondheim and University College of Sרr-Trרndelag in Norway for their principled support for the cause of justice in Palestine by proposing a motion to boycott Israeli universities. We support this historic step in the direction of applying effective pressure on Israel and holding it accountable for its occupation and apartheid policies, which violate international law and
fundamental human rights.

We urge the Board of Governors of the University of Trondheim and University College of Sרr-Trרndelag to declare at their upcoming meeting that Israeli universities and academic institutions cannot be normal partners of any self-respecting Norwegian institution. Indeed, it has to be recognized by academics the world over that Israeli universities are part and parcel of the structures of domination and oppression of the Palestinian people. They have played a direct and indirect role in promoting, justifying, developing or supporting the state‘s racist policies and persistent violations of human rights and international law. Most recently, and only as an example, a Tel Aviv University publication announced with pride that the Research & Development Directorate of the Israeli Ministry of Defense is currently funding 55 projects at the university; it went on to quote the head of the Security Studies Program at the University that “military R&D in Israel would not exist without the universities. They carry out all the basic scientific investigation, which is then developed either by the defence industries or the army. It should be noted that this is the same Ministry of Defense that executed the relentless and bloody war against the Palestinians in Gaza last December and January, killing,sometimes murdering, over 1400 Palestinians, more than 300 of whom were children, and wounding over 5000 people. Many neighborhoods were reduced to rubble, and educational institutions were destroyed. In general, the Israeli academy sees nothing wrong with partnering with the Israeli military machine.

As Israeli citizens, we strongly believe that the impunity of Israel must be challenged. Academic and cultural boycotts are effective measures available to world civil society to indicate its intolerance of oppression and as a means to bear pressure upon Israel to cease its campaign of violent colonial control over the Palestinian people. We support PACBI`s call for boycott in 2004 of Israeli academic and cultural institutions, like the Palestinian civil society‘s widely endorsed call for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) in 2005. These calls are based on the same moral principle embodied in the international civil society campaign against the apartheid regime in South Africa: that people of conscience must take a stand against oppression and use all the means of civil resistance available to bring it to an end.

We urge the Board of Governors to pass the boycott motion in its meeting
on November 12, 2009, and to join the growing global movement for justice
for the Palestinian people.

Sincerely,


______________


______________


Israeli Citizen

Links to the latest articles in this section

British activists kick off week-long boycott against Israeli settlement products
Israelis to Trondheim: Boycott the Israeli Academy Now!
Petition - talk to Hamas!

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Jews sans frontieres

Students "bully" Israel's plucky ambassador to the UK

8-11-2009
Since I've been working, quick JSF has made my blogging a lot easier. See this Ynet report on how students in the UK wanted to place Israel's ambassador to the UK, Ron Prossor, under citizen's arrest. It's headed Students bully Britain envoy:

    Protestors at the University of Nottingham prepared a rude welcome for Israel's Ambassador to England, Ron Prosor, welcoming him with anti-Israel signs and interrupting his speech.

    Hours before the visit, British police learned that students at the university intend to place the Israeli envoy under citizen's arrest. Prosor's lecture on Israel's peace efforts was delayed, as a heavy police guard escorted him into the lecture site through a back door.

    The lecture itself was accompanied by the shouting of charges and accusations against the State of Israel. During the event, students cut off Prosor on several occasions and some caused other disturbances.

    Despite the interruptions, the Israeli ambassador completed his lecture, before leaving the site in a secured vehicle accompanied by local security forces. Fearing for his safety, local police resorted to a deceptive ploy, leading Prosor through one entrance while protestors waited at a different exit.

    The envoy later said that the events at University of Nottingham are "yet another manifestation of the ugly smear campaign being managed against Israel on campuses across Britain."

    "It's regrettable to see important academic institutions becoming hostages in the hands of radicals, who seek to silence any civilized discussion," he said. "We will fight with all means available to us against academic boycotts, economic boycotts, and diplomatic-legal boycotts."

    Meanwhile, Minister Daniel Hershkowitz faced a similar experience while visiting Erasmus University in Holland. Protestors who attempted to disrupt the minister's address were removed from the site.


The news just gets better and better.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Ha'aretz

Norwegian official: Schools considering Israel boycott
By Cnaan Liphshiz

9-11-2009
A Norwegian university's controversial vote on boycotting Israel is part
of a nationwide campaign that may bring additional boycott votes at other
Norwegian universities, said a representative on the board of executives at the University of Tromso.

Hundreds of scholars from Israel and elsewhere have signed a petition
condemning the vote at the University of Trondheim, scheduled for November 12.

If the initiative passes, Trondheim, also known as the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), could become the first Western university to boycott Israel.

A representative of the executive board at the University of Tromso said
pro-Palestinian activists are trying to call a vote on boycotting Israel there as well.

"A group of people have petitioned the board to hold a vote on this in the coming weeks, but no decision has been made yet," said the board
representative, who spoke on condition of anonymity. He added there was "a national effort" to have Norwegian universities boycott Israel, and that the Norwegian boycott proponents were acting in unison with their American and British peers.

The petition condemning the Trondheim boycott initiative bears the signatures of more than 900 scholars, including Nobel laureates. It states that they "refute and condemn the campaign to boycott Israeli academics" and academic institutions.

"We stand in solidarity with Israeli academics and academic institutions; if you boycott them, boycott us as well," states the petition, co-signed by Nobel laureates Kenneth J. Arrow from Stanford University, Aaron Ciechanover from the Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Roald Hoffmann of Cornell University and Claude Cohen-Tannoudji of the Ecole Normale Superieure.

Parliamentarian Hans Olav Syversen from the Christian Democrat Party said NTNU was "turning itself into a laughingstock" by holding the vote. An NTNU spokesman said that the institution will hold the vote, but that the exact agenda for the vote has not been set yet.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

PIC

Stranded students in Gaza appeal for solution




8-11-2009
GAZA -- Palestinian students stranded in the Gaza Strip who could not travel via the Rafah border crossing with Egypt to follow up their studies abroad have called on the media to shed light on their plight.

The students appealed in a statement on Friday to all government institutions, the media and human rights groups to consider their just case and to highlight it before the local and international public opinion.

They said that many of them were either deprived of their right to study in the current semester in many universities or lost the entire academic year in others.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Birzeit University - Palestine


PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY


See also article here

31-10-2009
21 year old Berlanty Azzam was detained at a military checkpoint, blindfolded and then deported to Gaza on Monday 2nd November.

Azzam had been returning to Bethlehem after attending a job interview in Ramallah when she was detained on account of her Gaza-registeted ID. Whilst being held at the checkpoint, Azzam was told by soldiers that she would be taken to a detention facility until a petition to the Supreme Court by human rights organisation Gisha was resolved.

Despite such promises, Azzam was blindfolded, handcuffed and loaded into a military jeep, only to find herself left in Gaza late last night. The military refuses to let her return to the West Bank. Born in Gaza, Azzam has lived in Bethlehem since 2005, after being awarded an exit visa and a scholarship to study Business Administration at Bethlehem University. A second Gaza resident who was travelling in the same car as Azzam was also arrested and remains in detention.

Israel's military released a statement to the US news network CNN saying Azzam was "residing illegally" in the West Bank. Israel bans Palestinian residents of Gaza from studying at Palestinian universities in the West Bank, denying individuals such as Azzam the right to remain in the West Bank. Her deportation comes at a time of increased efforts by the Israeli military to forcibly remove Palestinians with ID cards that are registered in Gaza from the West Bank.

In 2000 there were 350 Gaza students at Birzeit University, many were deported, others stayed in the West Bank 'illegally' and risk being deported at any moment. By 2005 there were only 35 Gaza students in Birzeit. Today there are none.

The R2E Campaign strongly condemns the treatment that Azzam has received at the hands of the Israeli forces. Her deportation, simply for attempting to pursue her education in her home country, constitutes a severe violation of academic freedom. We call on all our supporters to contact their local government representatives, Israeli embassies and the Israeli Ministry for the Interior to protest the denial of Berlanty, and all students from Gaza, the Right to Study in the West Bank. We also call on our supporters to contact their local government representatives to demand a stronger stand from their governments on the issue of Palestinian right to education.

Please see the following contacts below:

Ehud Barak
Minister of Defence,
Ministry of Defence,
37 Kaplan Street,
Hakirya,
Tel Aviv 61909,
Israel
Fax: 00 972 3 691 6940
Email: minister@mod.gov.il

COPIES TO:
Yuli Tamir (Ms)
Minister of Education,
Ministry of Education ,
PO Box 292,
34 Shivtei Israel,
Jerusalem 91911,
Israel
Fax: 00 972 2 560 2223
Email: ytamir@knesset.gov.il

PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY

Urgent Appeals INDEX

What's new on this site?
Studies & Research: R2E Fact Sheet (30 April 2009)
Urgent Appeals: Open letter to international academic institutions from the R2E Campaign (17 January 2009)
Studies & Research: Report on Israeli police/ Military Escort of school children to and from At-Tuwani ( 4 November 2009)
Urgent Appeals: Urgent Call for Action: Gazan Student Deported. Support Right to Study (31 October 2009)
Activism News: Palestinian Elected as Honorary President of LSE Students' Union (30 October 2009)
Activism News: Norway university to vote next month on boycott of Israel (30 October 2009)
In The Media: Petition filed to overturn student's Gaza deportation (30 October 2009)

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Al Arabiya

Norway university to mull academic boycott of Israel

The letter criticized Israel for its assault of Gaza that inflicted "immense human suffering" that shocked the world

The letter criticized Israel for its assault of Gaza that inflicted "immense human suffering" that shocked the world

Mona Moussly

3-11-2009
DUBAI - A group of professors in Norway have called for a boycott of Israeli academics because of "systematic" discrimination against Palestinian students and for altering history to develop the Zionist ideology, the professors said in their proposal sent to Al Arabiya on Tuesday.

The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), where the professors work, is set to decide next week whether to boycott Israel after it received the proposal from 30 of its professors who said their aim was to put "pressure" on Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian land.

" Historians and archaeologists are important in the development of the Zionist ideology and renouncement of Palestinian history and identity. "
Open letter reads


"We, who have signed this letter, believe that it is time that academic institutions contributed to an international pressure against Israel so that real negotiations between Israel, democratically elected Palestinian authorities and the international society can begin," the open letter said.

The group accused Israeli universities and institutions of higher education of playing "a key role in the policy of oppression" and said "historians and archaeologists are important in the development of the Zionist ideology and renouncement of Palestinian history and identity."

The letter cited Israel's 22-day land, air and sea assault of Gaza as an example of Tel Aviv's actions that inflict "immense human suffering," which they said "shocked the world."


Academic freedom

" Israeli universities and other institutions of higher education have played a key role in the policy of oppression. "
Open letter


The letter also blasted Israeli institutions for "systematically" discriminating against Palestinian staff and students, which they said showed Israel had no regard for "the ideals of open universities and academic freedom."

The group called for the boycott to "cover the educational, research and culture institutions of the state of Israel and their representatives, regardless of religion or nationality" and said they hoped it would continue "until guarantees are issued that the occupation of Palestinian land will be terminated."

The board of directors at NTNU, Norway's second largest university located in the western town of Trondheim, has agreed to consider the motion, Anne Katherine Dahl, an advisor to the president of NTNU, told Al Arabiya.

"From NTNU there will be no further comment until the board has concluded on November 12th," Dahl said.

The board is composed of 11 members: four representatives of the state, four from the university staff, two student representatives and one from the temporary staff.

To read the english version of the open letter to NTNU Click Here

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Ma'an

UK student union boycotts Israeli goods

3-11-2009
Bethlehem - Following a landmark referendum, students at the UK's Sussex University in Brighton this week voted to boycott Israeli goods.

The decision comes in line with the international Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign, which calls upon Israel to respect international law and end the occupation of Palestinian territory.

The referendum received messages of support and thanks from Jewish and Israeli academics and non-governmental organizations that oppose Israel's occupation. Author and scholar Norman G. Finkelstein described the referendum result as "a victory, not for Palestinians but for truth and justice."

According to Iyad Burnat, head of the Popular Committee Against the Wall in Bil'in, "We hope even more people all around the world will follow by our example so that we can put an end to the Israeli occupation and dismantle the apartheid wall."

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

PNN

Sussex University Students' Union first in United Kingdom to boycott Israeli goods       

1-11-2009
Following a landmark referendum, students at Sussex University have voted to boycott Israeli goods.

The decision will become part of the international Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign, which calls upon the Israelis to respect international law and end the occupation of Palestine.
 
Besides being penned and assisted by Palestinian, Arabs and international supporters, the referendum received messages of support and thanks from Jewish and Israeli academics and non-governmental organizations that oppose the Israeli policy of occupation in Palestine. Author and scholar Norman G. Finkelstein described the referendum result as “a victory, not for Palestinians but for truth and justice.”
 
Head of Popular Committee against the Wall and-co-founder of Friends for Freedom and Justice in Bil’in, Iyad Burnat issued a brief statement of encouragement:

“The Committee really appreciates Sussex Students' Union remarkable idea of starting a boycott of Israeli goods. We hope even more people all around the world will follow the example so that we can put an end to the Israeli occupation and dismantle the apartheid Wall.”

The western Ramallah town of Bil’in is one of many that hold weekly demonstrations against the Wall and settlements. Bil’in also hosts an annual nonviolence conference.

The Sussux Students’ Union is the first student union in the UK to boycott Israeli goods.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Al Manar

Norway University to Vote Next Month on Boycott of Israel

   
30-10-2009
 

30-10-2009
The University of Trondheim in Norway may become the first university in the West to adopt an academic boycott of Israel, if a majority of its board votes in favor of the move at a meeting on the subject next month.

 
Three days prior to the November 12 vote by the board of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), the institution will host a lecture on Israel's use of anti-Semitism as a political tool. The lecture, by Prof. Moshe Zuckermann of Tel Aviv University, is part of a controversial six-session seminar on “Israel” that is comprised entirely of Norwegians and Israelis known for highly critical attitudes toward Israel.
 
Prof. Morten Levin, an NTNU lecturer and member of the seminar's organizing committee, set up the series of lectures - which also featured Ilan Pappe and Stephen Walt - with Ann Rudinow Saetnan and Rune Skarstein. All have signed a call for an academic boycott of Israel.
 
In a letter this week to Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, the Simon Wiesenthal Center's director for international relations, Shimon Samuels, called the seminar "a new stage in Norwegian incitement to Jew-hatred" and "outrageously anti-Israel bigotry."
 
According to a scientist working at NTNU who spoke to Haaretz on condition of anonymity, the idea of holding a vote on boycotting Israel was modeled on the campaign run by Sue Blackwell, a leading proponent of an academic boycott of Israel in the United Kingdom. A group of pro-Israel employees of NTNU are currently looking for ways to prevent the boycott from being adopted, drawing on the legal reasoning that in 2007 prompted Britain's University and College Union - of which Blackwell is a prominent member - to nix plans for a boycott of Israel.
 
According to people who fought the U.K. boycott motion, it was dropped after legal consultants told UCU officials that a boycott of Israel would violate anti-discrimination laws. "We have to see how similar the laws in Norway are," the Trondheim scientist said.
 
"If this were the U.K., [a boycott] would be illegal. But this is Norway, where these things may fly," said Manfred Gerstenfeld, chairman of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, who has published a book on anti-Semitism and anti-Israelism in the Nordic countries.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Anna in Palestine

For anyone who doesn't know this, last Spring, Hampshire College became the first US college to divest from the Israeli occupation—33 years after they became the first US college to divest from Apartheid South Africa! Times are changing and we all have much to learn from Hampshire folks.

Therefore,I am excited to announce the 2009 National Campus Boycott, Divestment,Sanctions Conference, taking place Nov20th - Nov 22nd at Hampshire College in Amherst,Massachusetts. Find out more and register at: http://www.hsjp.org/2009/09/21/CampusBDS/

See below here

Source


---------------------------------------------------------------

Students For Justice In Palestine

a Hampshire student group


09:53 PM
Announcing the 2009 Campus Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Conference at Hampshire College

National Campus Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions Conference

endorsed by the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel

What & Where: This fall from November 20th through the 22nd, students, faculty, and staff from around the country who are engaged in Palestine solidarity activism will converge for a conference on campus Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS). This conference has three key goals:

1)    To co-educate and share resources amongst campus organizers on the process of initiating BDS campaigns on campuses
2)    To strategize tactics to address the needs of different campuses in carrying out BDS campaigns
3)    To bring together Palestine-solidarity campus groups that have or have not met under a larger network in order to strive towards a coordinated national BDS campaign.

There have been many BDS conferences around the country, but rarely have they focused exclusively on the campus movement. This conference therefore presents an exceptional and important opportunity for this movement.

Why: In July of 2005, “a clear majority of Palestinian civil society called upon international civil society organizations and people of conscience all over the world to impose broad boycotts and implement divestment initiatives against Israel, similar to those applied to South Africa in the apartheid era, until Israel meets its obligation to recognize the Palestinian people's inalienable right to self-determination and fully complies with international law.”*   In addition, BDS is a non-violent means of protest and action that campuses in the United States can directly engage in to effectively stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people. A similar strategy was adopted in the struggle to end apartheid in South Africa in the 1970’s and 1980’s, and campus groups played a large role in helping spark and maintain that successful movement.

As campus members in the United States, we are directly complicit in perpetuating the injustices committed against the Palestinian people – our schools’ money is invested in companies that directly profit from Israel’s militarism, annexation of Palestinian land, and apartheid practices. After sixty-years of displacement, over forty-years of occupation, a two-year old siege, and in light of the recent invasion of Gaza and the continuing expansion of settlements in the West Bank, we must act now to cultivate the BDS movement in the United States. As members of academic communities, we can engage BDS as a means of applying economic and public pressure on Israel to abide by international law and we can change the discourse around Palestine/Israel in this country.

How to Participate: Attend the National Campus BDS conference at Hampshire College in Amherst, MA along with other members of your campus group. You will have the opportunity to organize workshops and panels, engage in discussions led by peers, listen to panels and lectures by influential members of the movement, develop skills, share resources, explore strategies, build networks, and more. Workshops at this conference will have a particular focus on: education and campus outreach, movement building strategies, and utilizing publicity and media for BDS. We encourage both Palestine-solidarity and allied groups to attend and contribute to this important conference through general participation, the building of a larger organizing network, and the facilitation of workshops. (In order to facilitate a workshop, please see the “Workshop Proposal Submission Form” at the end of this post.)

Prominent public figures and outspoken supporters of the BDS movement will be attending the conference as keynote speakers and panelists, including representatives of the BNC and PACBI.

Dates and Times: Friday, November 20th at 6 PM through Sunday, November 22nd, at 9 PM.

Hosted By: Hampshire College Students for Justice in Palestine and allied groups, and endorsed by various Palestine Solidarity organizations.

Please continue to check our website www.hsjp.org, where we will announce updates, lodging/food information, financial aid, and a place for registration for the conference.

Please forward this to other Palestine solidarity activists and mark the date! See you at Hampshire!

Toward a free Palestine,
Hampshire College SJP
hampshiresjp@gmail.com

Workshop Proposal Submission Form

Although Hampshire College Students for Justice in Palestine is organizing the logistics and providing the spaces for the 2009 National Campus BDS Conference, most of the content of the conference will come from other attending activists with campus organizing experience.

If you wish to organize and facilitate a workshop or panel at the National Campus Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Conference at Hampshire College in November of 2009, please complete the following workshop proposal form and submit it to BDSconference2009@gmail.com by no later than October 12th, 2009. Please only complete this process if you are certain you would like to organize and facilitate a workshop. Following the approval of your workshop by October 19th, you will be e-mailed a confirmation letter.

In order to submit a proposal, please answer each of the numbers below in a document. Before each answer, include the question number and the question itself. Save the document as the following: (Your Name) – BDS Workshop Proposal, and save it as a .doc, .rtf, or .odt file.

Please note: This conference is aimed at individuals and groups who already have an understanding of the situation in Palestine. Therefore, such workshop proposals as “Palestine 101” are discouraged. However, workshops that could replace “Palestine 101” include – “Teaching Palestine 101” or “Palestine 201: Organizing around Resource Politics in Palestine.” (Primary emphasis should be related to campus organizing and BDS strategies).

Workshop/Panel Descriptions: For this conference, panels are defined as educational presentations that are led by two or more individuals, with time for follow up questions from the audience. Workshops will be organized as interactive sessions, including skill-shares, skill-building exercises, dialogue opportunities, networking, debate spaces, educational activities, and more.

Workshop/Panel Proposal Questions -

Workshop/Panel Facilitator Information

1.    Name of your organization, if applicable:
2.    Name of your college, university, or school:
3.    Name of primary facilitator and contact information (e-mail, phone number. Can be contacted for clarifying questions):
4.    Name of other potential facilitators, affiliated organizations (if applicable), and e-mails:

Workshop/Panel Information

5.    Title:
6.    One Sentence Introduction to workshop/panel Subject:
7.    Description of workshop/panel (4-12 sentences):
8.    Objectives (tools and/or knowledge participants will come away with):
9.    Format (panel, presentation, discussion, activity, etc.):

Other
10.    What A/V or other special equipment will you need? Will you need us to provide it or will you be able to? If you are able to, may other groups use your equipment?:
11.    Do any of the presenters or facilitators have any scheduling constraints?:
12.    Any other information that you feel is important to include:

 

* "What is the Call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)? |." Global BDS Movement. 15 June 2009. <http://bdsmovement.net/?q=node/159>.

Source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Al Jazeera

Olmert faces tough crowd


By Teymoor Nabili in    

 

Photo by Getty Images

While those critical of Iran were given front row seats when President Ahmedinejad visited Columbia University, critics of Ehud Olmert were ushered from the hall when he spoke to students at Chicago University this week.

21-10-2009
When President Ahmadinejad of Iran spoke to students at Columbia University in September 2007, the students, the faculty and the media were all given front row seats to condemn and to vilify.

Even the President of the University, Lee Bollinger, took the opportunty to get a dig in, telling Ahmadinejad:

"“Mr. President, you exhibit all the signs of a petty and cruel dictator”

The New York Times reported:

"Mr. Bollinger praised himself and Columbia for showing they believed in freedom of speech by inviting the Iranian president, then continued his attack."

The entire event generated reams of press coverage.

Contrast this with the experience faced by Ehud Olmert when he spoke to students at Chicago University this week.

In a letter to students, the university expressly forbade any video or audio recording equipment, barred members of the media from attending, told students they needed to be there 2 hours before the speech for security screening, and stipulated that questions should be pre-submitted, presumably also for screening.

The university ended the letter with the somewhat ironic comment::

"we appreciate your co-operation with our efforts to to ensure open discourse and freedom of expression."

Despite these efforts, a small group of students did protest, inside and outside the lecture hall, condeming Olmert's decision to attack Gaza and demanding that he respond to the Goldstone report.

But where critics of Ahmadinejad had been encouraged - and given every opportunity - to attack, critics of Olmert were ushered from the hall.

The New York Times and the mainstream US media didn't see fit to cover the event.

However, the Electronic Intifada did, and even managed to sneak in a camera:

Source

-------

Electronic Intifada

EI exclusive video: Protesters shout down Ehud Olmert in Chicago

Maureen Clare Murphy





16-10-2009
Approximately 30 activists -- mainly students from area universities -- disrupted a lecture given in Chicago by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert yesterday which was hosted by the University of Chicago's Harris School of Public Policy. While Olmert's speech was disrupted inside the lecture hall, approximately 150 activists protested outside the hall in the freezing rain.

Protesters inside the hall read off the names of Palestinian children killed during Israel's assault on Gaza last winter. They shouted that it was unacceptable that the war crimes suspect be invited to speak at a Chicago university when his army destroyed a university in Gaza in January. They reminded the audience of the more than 1,400 Palestinians killed during the Gaza attacks and the more than 1,200 killed during Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 2006. Both invasions happened during Olmert's premiership.

With interventions coming every few minutes throughout his appearance, Olmert had difficulty giving his speech and often appeared frustrated. At one point he appealed for "just five minutes" to speak without being interrupted.

The demonstration was mobilized last week after organizers learned of the lecture, paid for by a grant provided by Jordan's King Abdullah II. Within hours an appeal was issued, urging those concerned with Palestinian rights to call the university and demand that the lecture be canceled. The call was put out by major community organizations such as the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC)-Chicago, American Muslims for Palestine and the United States Palestine Community Network, as well as solidarity organizations al-Awda, the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network, the International Solidarity Movement, the Palestine Solidarity Group-Chicago and area campus groups such as Students for Justice in Palestine chapters at DePaul University and the University of Illinois at Chicago, as well as the Arab Student Union at Moraine Valley.

The security presence at the lecture was severe with university police, the US Secret Service and Israeli security present -- many of them visibly armed -- with Israeli security checking in those who had registered in advance to attend the lecture. Video and photography was banned inside the hall and media were not allowed to cover the lecture. Despite these restrictions, activists managed to take video inside the hall and drop an eight-foot-long banner from the mezzanine that read "Goldstone" in both English and Hebrew, referring to the recently published UN report investigating violations of international law during the Gaza invasion. One activist was arrested and put in a headlock by a police officer, witnesses said, and released around midnight. Approximately 30 supporters waited for him at the police station while he was detained.

Towards the end of the lecture, Olmert put his hand over his brow and squinted to search out the source of the shout, "There's no discussion with a war criminal -- the only discussion you should be having is in court!" That call was made by Ream Qato, who graduated from the university in 2007, and added, "You belong in the Hague!" Qato told The Electronic Intifada that yesterday's protest "Set the stage for University of Chicago students and students in the Chicago area ... no one should be afraid of speaking out against someone." She added that the demonstration was significant because "The Palestinian community [in Chicago] for the first time went to a university campus to protest."


Approximately 150 protesters demonstrated outside the University of Chicago hall where former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was speaking. (Maureen Clare Murphy)

Second-year medical student Afshan Mohiuddin was removed from the hall after she voiced her disapproval at the Harris School dean's on-stage assertion that Olmert was invited to express his views. "He can do that at the International Court of Justice, not at this university," Mohiuddin shouted, adding, "[Olmert] belongs in a cage, not on a stage!"

Mohiuddin told The Electronic Intifada that "it was ironic that they searched us [instead of him]," considering that Olmert is suspected of war crimes. She added, "As a University of Chicago student I was upset with the lack of commotion on behalf of the student body before the event ... No one has protested the event."

Mohiuddin's frustration was echoed in a commentary published by the University of Chicago's student publication The Chicago Maroon earlier this week, in which third-year student Nadia Marie Ismail decried the lack of protest by the university community towards the Olmert speech. She contrasted this silence with the pressure the Center for Middle Eastern Studies faced after a lecture earlier this year by The Electronic Intifada's Ali Abunimah (who was the first to disrupt Olmert's speech yesterday), University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer and Norman Finkelstein, whose lost bid for tenure at DePaul University is attributed to outside pressure by Israel government apologists. "[T]hat University center was put under unprecedented pressure for weeks before and months after the event, with claims that University centers and schools should not host 'one-sided' speakers," Ismail wrote.

Olmert's lecture in Chicago was one of several scheduled throughout the United States. His speech at the University of Kentucky the previous day was disrupted by activists and met with a protest outside. These demonstrations are part of a wave of notched-up dissent towards Israeli officials implicated in war crimes and racist policy. In 2003, former Israeli minister Natan Sharansky was greeted with a pie in the face by an activist at Rutgers University in New Jersey. Last year at the UK's Oxford University, a speech by Israeli President Shimon Peres was drowned out by protesters outside while students inside the hall disrupted his talk.

One of the organizers of the protest, Hatem Abudayyeh, National Coordinating Committee member of the United States Palestine Community Network, hoped for a larger count of protesters despite the adverse weather. However, he said, "The fact that there's people around the world who know about it, the fact that PACBI [the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel] sent us a letter of support and endorsement of our action, the fact that there was coordination with the outside protest and the inside disruption -- all of these components and aspects of the action made it one of the more successful ones that we've done."

He added, "There is real change happening, whether it's the international response to the Lebanon war or the international response to the Gaza war. The US is the most powerful country in the world, Israel is a powerful military as well, but the Palestinians have the world on their side."

Video shot and produced by The Electronic Intifada

Maureen Clare Murphy is Managing Editor of The Electronic Intifada and an activist with the Palestine Solidarity Group-Chicago, which co-sponsored the demonstration.


Source

---------

Norman Finkelstein Blog

Embedded reporter (and former student) tells it like it was


20-10-2009
Dear Professor Finkelstein,

When we first heard that former Israeli PM Ehud Olmert was coming to the University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy, about 30 of us Palestinian activists (mainly students) RSVP’d.

We arrived at the event. They checked our names off and gave us pink wristbands to go in. But once you were in, no re-entry was allowed. So we stayed in the lobby and waited for other activists. We all gathered together and planned out what would be an internal disruption. We were to each stand up and say something to disrupt Olmert’s speech every 2 minutes or so. Some of us would also be holding a banner from the balcony, facing Olmert that said “Goldstone Report” to make him nervous during his speech. While we were doing this, of course a protest would also be held outside.

Once we got into the lecture hall, it felt like a checkpoint. An IDF soldier and U.S. secret service were everywhere. After getting our items searched and going through a metal detector, we were finally allowed in. We all spread around, some of us in the main area and others on the balcony. It seemed as if the security had Palestinian radar, as their eyes were on us the whole time. One young Palestinian man who was wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh I believe, was racially profiled. Because of his skin color and attire, he made some members of the crowd a bit nervous, so the security warned him and his friends who were sitting with him not to disrupt.

Olmert comes in to speak, and after literally 10 seconds from the beginning of his speech, Ali Abunimah disrupts him, standing up and saying that a war criminal should not have freedom of expression, and also expressed his disappointment with his Alma Mater for inviting a murderer. He was escorted out by the police.

After that, approximately every minute or two, someone else stood up and disrupted Olmert’s speech. One student read off the names of people in Gaza that were killed at Olmert’s hands. Others repeatedly mentioned he was a war criminal and asserted that he had blood on his hands for the murders of 1,400 Palesitnians in Gaza, as well as 1,200 Lebanese.

After each person was escorted out by the police, cheering ensued. Olmert was getting nervous or frustrated, as he kept laughing and smiling. However, he began instigating the Palestinian crowd by saying more extreme statements as the disruptions died down toward the end. It seemed as if he WANTED more interruptions. Perhaps he anticipated disruptions and didn’t write a speech. He kept talking about how Israel had been terrorized for 60 years, and is merely trying to defend herself. He also mentioned that Israel is and always will be a Jewish nation. According to Olmert, Jerusalem has always been fully Jewish, and if you dig under the Temple Mount, no history of Palesitnians can be found. This made us activists even more angry.

During the lecture, a young male student stood up and interrupted (as usual, no different from any others). A police officer, who WAS NOT wearing a uniform, just regular attire, comes up and grabs him! From where I was sitting, it looked like he was choking the boy. Another member of the crowd, who was this boy’s good friend, got up to defend him and tried to push the man off him, not knowing it was a police officer. Another police officer, in uniform, arrested him.The police officers at the event were generally very unfair and harsh on the Palestinian activists. The Zionists in the audience were also getting increasingly hostile, one of them throwing a book at our activists.

I was one of the last to disrupt. After my shout I was escorted out by a police officer. On the way out, I said shalom to the IDF soldier and joined the crowd outside protesting.

I believe that Thursday was a huge success for us. Olmert didn’t get to speak. About 30 of us stood up and interrupted him throughout his speech. He was constantly getting disrupted. As one of our disrupters said, a war criminal should never be allowed to speak unless it’s in front of an international court. I’m proud of the Chicago activist community for having the courage to look Olmert in the eye and tell him exactly what we feel.

A friend in Gaza contacted me and told me they heard what we did, and that people in Gaza were so proud of us in Chicago. It made me proud of what we did, and it was a historical day I will never forget. But Olmert is still on a speaking tour across America. His next stop: San Francisco. I hope the activists there come out strong and refuse to let him speak as well. As one the students who disrupted said, “Justice will be served.”

Dr. Finkelstein, I wish you were there. But no worries, you were there with us in spirit.

Sincerely, your former student,

S.D.

Source see also here and here


---------------------------------------------------------------

Stop the Wall

'Study in Israel' billboards modified by guerilla advertisers



14-6-2009
10 bus shelter billboards advertising the University of California’s “Study in Israel” campaign were remade into “Boycott Israel” ads and placed around Berkeley and San Francisco in May.

Under the headline, “Boycott Israel? We boycott Israel because…”, one of the modified posters depicts students saying, “I believe in speaking out against racism. Israel’s entrenched system of racial discrimination & segregation against the Palestinian citizens of Israel is frighteningly similar to the former apartheid system in South Africa!” and “I believe that governments must be held accountable for their actions! Israel denies its responsibility for the waves of ethnic cleansing that have made millions of Palestinians into refugees.”

The original ad campaign was financed by the pro-Israel publicity agency BlueStar PR as part of an intensive campaign to promote study in Israel at California universities. The University of California recently reinstated its study abroad program at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, after years of lobbying from pro-Israel students and professionals.

The posters ask members of the University of California community to pressure U.C. to respect the cultural and academic boycott initiated by Palestinian civil society in April 2004.


Above: Prior to modification.



Above: “I believe that governments must be held accountable for their actions! Israel denies its responsibility for the waves of ethnic cleansing that have made millions of Palestinians into refugees.”



Above: Prior to modification.



Above: “I believe in speaking out against racism. Israel’s entrenched system of racial discrimination & segregation against the Palestinian citizens of Israel is frighteningly similar to the former apartheid system in South Africa!”

For more photos, click here.

source


---------------------------------------------------------------

Boycott Divestment and sanctions for Palestine

Palestinian Students in Gaza Launch Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel



A Call from Palestine
Palestinian Students’ Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel (PSCABI)


29-5-2009
"Gaza today has become the test of our indispensable morality and common humanity."
Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) National Committee, 27 December 2008 Statement

 
The Palestinian Students’ Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel (PSCABI) calls upon freedom-loving students all over the world to stand in solidarity with us by boycotting Israeli academic institutions for their complicity in perpetuating Israel's illegal military occupation and apartheid system. We note the historic action taken by thousands of courageous students of British and American universities in occupying their campuses in a show of solidarity with the brutally oppressed Palestinian people in Gaza. We also deeply appreciate the decision by Hampshire College to divest from companies profiting from the Israeli occupation. Such pressure on Israel is the most likely to contribute to ending its denial of our rights, including the right to education.

In this regard, we fully endorse the call for boycott issued by the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, PACBI, in 2004.[i]

We emphasize our endorsement of the BDS call issued by more than 170 Palestinian civil society organizations in July 2005.[ii]

We also support the Call from Gaza issued by a group of civil society organizations in the second week of the Gaza Massacre (Gaza 2009).[iii]

Our goal, as students, is to play a role in promoting the global BDS movement which has gained an unprecedented momentum as a result of the latest genocidal war launched by Israel against the occupied and besieged Gaza Strip. We address our fellow students to take whatever step possible, however small, to stand up for justice, international law and the inalienable rights of the indigenous people of Palestine by applying effective and sustainable pressure on Israel, particularly in the form of BDS, to help put an end to its colonial and racist regime over the Palestinians.

We strongly urge our fellow university students all over the world to:

(1) Support all the efforts aimed at boycotting Israeli academic institutions;

(2) Pressure university administrations to divest from Israel and from companies directly or indirectly supporting the Israeli occupation and apartheid policies;

(3) Promote student union resolutions condemning Israeli violations of international law and human rights and endorsing BDS in any form;

(4) Support the Palestinian student movement directly.

To break the medieval and barbaric Israeli siege of Gaza, people of conscience need to move with a sense of urgency and purpose. Israel must be compelled to pay a heavy price for its war crimes and crimes against humanity through the intensification of the boycott against it and against institutions and corporations complicit in its crimes. As in the anti-apartheid struggle in solidarity with the black majority in South Africa, students concerned about justice and sustainable peace have a moral duty to support our boycott efforts.

The Palestinian Students’ Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel (PSCABI)

Endorsed by:

    * Progressive Student Union Block;
    * Fateh Youth Organization;
    * Progressive Student Labor Front;
    * Islamic Block;
    * Islamic League of Palestinian Students;
    * Student Unity Block;
    * Students Affairs (University of Palestine).

[i] http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=869
[ii] http://www.bdsmovement.net/?q=node/52
[iii] http://www.odsg.org/co/index.php/component/content/article/1100-a-call-f...

source

---------------------------------------------------------------

Bernama.com

Islamic University Of Gaza Appeals For Aid


5-6-2009
KUALA LUMPUR -- The board of trustees of the Islamic University of Gaza where two buildings were destroyed in an aerial attack by the Zionist regime last December has appealed for aid from Malaysians for reconstruction.

Board director Dr Jamal Naji El-Khoudary said US$15 billion was needed to rebuild the two buildings.

He spoke to reporters after a news conference, held in conjunction with the commemoration of the "An-Naksah" (1967 War), organised by the Palestine Centre of Excellence (PACE) at the headquarters of the Jamaah Islah Malaysia (JIM), here.

PACE director Assoc Prof Dr Hafizi Mohd Noor said the people could send their donations through the Maybank account 562209608847 in the name of "Pertubuhan Jamaah Islah Malaysia" or contact the JIM headquarters at 03-4108 9669.

He also said that the people of the world should remember the An-Naksah or defeat in the Six-Day War in the process to establish peace in Palestine.

"The struggle to free Palestine, especially the Al-Aqsa Mosque, belongs not only to the people of Palestine but is the responsibility of all Muslims, in fact every member of the international community who loves peace," he said.

source

---------------------------------------------------------------

the Guardian

Why Palestinians are calling for a boycott of Israeli universities

A Palestinian academic union urges British colleagues to back a boycott in support of 'our struggle for justice'
 
By Amjad Barham

26-5-2009
Palestinian academics have been heartened by the outpouring of solidarity with our people on the part of British academics and students – the latter attested to by the creative "student occupation movement" in the wake of the brutal Israeli war against the Palestinian people in Gaza last December and January.

What does the Palestinian academic community expect from international colleagues?

It has sometimes been suggested that solidarity with Palestinian academics is best expressed in fostering academic links between British and Palestinian universities, with the aim of strengthening the capacity of Palestinian academic institutions that have suffered from the long siege imposed by Israel's colonial regime.

While we value academic and institutional forms of support, we feel that this is not sufficient. Decades of life under military occupation have taught us that no sustainable development, including in the academy, is possible without freedom from occupation and oppression.

We are keenly aware that British intellectuals and academics have been at the forefront of many international campaigns for justice, the most illustrious and successful of which was the fight against the apartheid regime in South Africa. What we ask for is moral consistency: if it was acceptable for British academics to support unreservedly the academic boycott of South Africa with a view to ending the system of apartheid, then the same should apply in the case of Israel.

It is the duty of civil society to shoulder the moral responsibility of isolating Israel in the international arena through various forms of boycott and sanctions to compel it to obey international law and respect Palestinian rights.

It is well documented that Israeli academic institutions are deeply complicit in Israel's colonial and racist policies against the Palestinian people. Not only do Israeli universities and research institutions co-operate closely with the security-military establishment through research and other academic activities, they have never dissociated themselves from the occupation regime, despite the more than four decades of the systematic stifling of Palestinian education.

Israeli universities have never condemned the entrenched and institutionalised system of discrimination against Palestinian citizens of Israel within the Israeli polity, society and even the academy.

Israel and its supporters have argued that the Palestinian call for institutional boycott infringes the universal principle of academic freedom. Palestinians find this argument biased and hypocritical – not to mention based on false premises.

The privileging of academic freedom above more basic human rights conflicts with the very idea of universal human rights, as it assigns far more importance to the academic freedom of a sector of Israeli society than to the fundamental rights of all Palestinians to live in freedom and dignity. Is upholding the academic freedom – in our view, the privileges – of Israeli academics a loftier aim than defending the freedom of an entire people living under a brutal and illegal occupation?

"Constructive engagement" with the Israeli academy is often suggested to us as a more effective mechanism to address the injustice inflicted upon us by Israel. We have tried this method, only to realise that as long as the terms of the relationship between the Israelis and the Palestinians are those of occupier and occupied, and oppressor and oppressed, the engagement process only results in normalising the occupation on the ground and whitewashing Israeli atrocities abroad.

I can give an example from my own personal experience. Once, as I was crossing one of the hundreds of military checkpoints on my way to my university, I was stopped by an Israeli soldier who turned out to be a fellow mathematician at an Israeli university. But our collegiality ended here: he told me that I could cross the checkpoint if I was able to answer a mathematics question correctly! What kind of engagement can be possible here?

As to the charge that the boycott is discriminatory, it is completely false. The Palestinian boycott call is institutional; it simply does not target individual Israeli academics and cannot, therefore, be "discriminatory" in any real sense of the term. Endorsing and applying the boycott does not in any way prevent individual Israeli academics from participating in international academic conferences and research projects, so long as the projects themselves are not based on institutional links with Israeli universities and research centers.

Moreover, being enshrined in universalist values and principles, the boycott call adopted by an overwhelming majority in Palestinian civil society categorically rejects all forms of racial discrimination and racism, including Islamophobia and anti-Semitism.

Finally, we of course recognise and deeply appreciate the steadily increasing support for the boycott we are witnessing among Israeli academics, who have reached the conclusion that only sustained pressure on Israel and its complicit institutions can bring about a just peace.

Our struggle for justice and peace is best supported through actions that aim at ending Israel's impunity by compelling it to respect international law and our rights. Boycott is the most effective among those.

• Dr Amjad Barham is president of the Palestinian Federation of Unions of University Professors and Employees (PFUUPE)

source



---------------------------------------------------------------

WSW

Pro-Israel forces attempt to silence University of California Santa Barbara professor

By Jack Cody

25-5-2009
On January 19 University of California Santa Barbara sociology Professor William Robinson sent an email to students on the roster of his Global Affairs course in which he compared the Israeli occupation of Gaza to the Warsaw Ghetto. He was subsequently brought up on disciplinary charges by the Academic Senate of the university, as well as subjected to harassment and persecution by pro-Israeli elements.

The charges against Robinson pose a serious threat to academic freedom. They are an effort to intimidate critics of Israeli policy at a time when that regime’s actions have produced widespread revulsion. Ultimately, the aim of such witch-hunts is to silence those opposed to the policies of one of the US government’s key allies.

Robinson’s January 19 email began with a strong denunciation of the Israeli assault on Gaza. The professor, who is Jewish, wrote: “Gaza is Israel’s Warsaw—a vast concentration camp that confined and blockaded Palestinians, subjecting them to the slow death of malnutrition, disease and despair, nearly two years before their subjection to the quick death of Israeli bombs. We are witness to a slow-motion process of genocide (Websters: ‘the systematic killing of, or a program of action intended to destroy, a whole national or ethnic group’), a process whose objective is not so much to physically eliminate each and every Palestinian than to eliminate the Palestinians as a people in any meaningful sense of the notion of people-hood.”

Robinson then displayed a graphic set of photographs that had been circulating the Internet through email forwards. At the time Robinson was unaware of the identity of the originator of the email, although he subsequently learned that it was a Jewish-American professor at another university. The series juxtaposed photographs of Nazi operations and atrocities with images of Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The photo series is arranged such that each image from one time period is displayed next to a corresponding image from the other. Pictures of the Warsaw Ghetto are on the left, Gaza on the right. The photographs are disturbing, as is the often-uncanny similarity apparent in the side-by-side images.

The full original course material can be viewed at the Committee to Defend Academic Freedom at UCSB, a blog created in defense of Professor Robinson, and the principle of academic freedom by a group of UCSB students (http://sb4af.wordpress.com/).

On February 9 Robinson received a copy of a letter that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) sent, in addition to Robinson himself, to the president of the University of California system based in Oakland, the chancellor of UCSB, his dean and the chair of his department. The ADL, a prominent defender of Israeli policy, accuses Robinson of anti-Semitism and of abusing his access to university resources by using the student mailing list to disseminate personal views unrelated to course material.

On February 19 these same accusations appeared in two official grievances filed with the university by two of Robinson’s former students. The pair had withdrawn from the course, unbeknownst to Robinson, because they claimed the content of the email was intimidating and, according to one student, made her “nauseous.” The claims of misconduct put forth by the two students are nearly identical and are very similar to those cited in the ADL’s February 9 letter.

The accusations against Robinson are baseless and politically motivated. In an interview with the World Socialist Web Site, he discussed the issues involved.

“The essence of the charges,” Professor Robinson said, “is that the course material I submitted was anti-Semitic, and according to these letters [from the ADL and the two students], it was anti-Semitic because it was critical of the state of Israel. That is absurd, that the condemnation of the policies of the state of Israel is equivalent to anti-Semitism. One, anti-Semitism, is the discrimination against and oppression of a religious/ethnic group, and the other, criticism of Israel, is a condemnation of the policies of a nation-state.”

As to the charges that the material contained in the email was unrelated to the course, Robinson responded: “How in the world the invasion of Gaza in January is unrelated to a course on global affairs in the same month is absolutely beyond my comprehension!”

The UCSB catalogue describes the course as a “[s]urvey of the principal theories and debates in globalization studies, with a focus on economic, political and cultural transnational processes.” According to this description, the military occupation of one sovereign territory by another is clearly highly relevant to such a course.

“On March 9,” Robinson pointed out, “Abraham Foxman, the president of the ADL convenes a meeting on the campus of the University of California Santa Barbara with about ten faculty members and two deans. Some people at the meeting assume the purpose of the meeting was to search for a chair of the Jewish Studies program, but when the meeting starts, Foxman announces that the only thing on his agenda is the demand that I be prosecuted.

“On March 25 the university announces it is opening up a formal inquiry, a formal investigation of me and bringing me up on charges of possible violation of the faculty code of conduct. What is going on here is a tremendous assault on academic freedom; an assault in which the community has been complicit, and an assault which has been orchestrated from outside the university by the Israel lobby.

“What became clear is that the entire grievance process had been orchestrated from the outside by the Israel lobby. This is part of a more systematic campaign. The Israel lobby goes after anyone and everyone that criticizes the state of Israel.

“What is particularly egregious in this case,” says Robinson, “is that the University of California Santa Barbara is undermining academic freedom, bringing shame to the university. Some university officials have been complicit with this attack against me and this attack against academic freedom. We have documented a whole series of procedural irregularities.”

Professor Robinson has received strong support from students and professors on the campus, as well as concerned members of the local community. A group of students created the Committee To Defend Academic Freedom at UCSB and launched a Web site documenting up-to-date details of the Robinson case and mobilizing resources to counter the pro-Israeli forces. “Students on the campus, graduates and undergraduates, when they heard of this, became enraged,” says Robinson. “They feel that the integrity of their own education is under threat.”

A forum to discuss academic freedom originally scheduled to take place on the campus of UCSB on May 7 was put off until May 21 to make arrangements to accommodate a larger audience due to the amount of popular interest over the Robinson case within the Santa Barbara community.

source

Archive: 10 feb 2009 - 4 may 2009



« Terug naar Wereldpers

Overzicht Reacties over dit Artikel

gebruikersnaam:
wachtwoord:
wachtwoord vergeten?
Sloop de muur help mee
Laaste reacties
datum: 06-09-2010 17:16
Voor Lara Friedman kan dit dan wel de enige pragmatische mogelijkheid zijn, dat neemt niet weg dat h...
by plamp
datum: 06-09-2010 16:48
Slechts 1 correctie op dit Goebbels-achtige stuk; De Israelische regering zetelt in Jeruzalem en nie...
by Unger 2
datum: 06-09-2010 16:42
@Aart van Wijngaarden, Je haalt met je verwarde kop wel heel wat dingen door elkaar. Antisemitisme i...
by Balest
datum: 06-09-2010 15:19
@ Aart dat kan nog een hele tijd duren.Dit bericht komt van Amnesty intl,die ik altijd serieus genom...
by medi assuli







Gretta bij Rafah klein 19 mei 2009


Hosted by Webspacedesign