Astrid Essed aan BBC: REFUSAL OF BROADCASTING IS NOT ''IMPARTIALITY'', BUT A DENIAL OF THE UNIVERSAL LAWS OF CIVILISATION
Reageer (0)BBC
HALL OF SHAME
REFUSAL OF BROADCASTING IS NOT ''IMPARTIALITY'', BUT A DENIAL OF THE UNIVERSAL LAWS OF CIVILISATION
Dear Mr Thompson and the BBC Staff,,
According to my opinion, the BBC refusal to broadcast the DEC appeal for humanitarian help for Gaza, is a shameless denial of the universal humanitarian values, on which civilisation is based.
Access for help-organisations to Gaza
I can be short about your practical argument of no access to the
suffering Gazan civilian population, which is invalid, since the access
is the problem of all humanitarian help-organisations, the
International Red Cross included
Therefore it is not to the BBC, but to the public for deciding whether to donate or not
''Impartiality''
However, the most important is your fundamental objection, that your impartiality is at stake
I quote your reaction
''The danger for the BBC is that this could be interpreted as taking a political stance on an ongoing story. ''
Your socalled ''political'' argument is invalid, since a political point of view is not at stake, but merely the humanitarian disaster of a civilian population
According to your line of thinking, no broadcasting could ever be
done in any war-area, where the civilian population is victim, like
Darfur, Congo etc
You know full well, that apart from ''taking sides'', the humanitarian disaster is caused by a kind of warfare, which violates International Humanitarian law, demanding a strict distinction between combatants [military and fighters] and non-combatants [civilians]
This is applicable to ALL CONFLICTSPARTIES and not ''political'' at all
See International Humanitarian Law:
In this case however, the Gazan civilian population has been
subjected to Israeli indiscriminate atracks with phosphorusbombs, which
led to 1300 dead and more than 5000 wounded
Thousands of people are homeless
See the Red Cross
Hospitals have a lack of medicines by the continuing israeli blockade on Gaza
See the Red Cross:
Red Cross helpers were denied access to Gaza, ambulances were shoot at
As you have seen, my point of view is supported by the NEUTRAL International Red Cross
Mr Thompson, therefore a political point of view is not at stake
here, nor the ''impartiality'' of the BBC, since it concerns the need
of the civilian population, who always must be protected against the
consequences of war, whether they are Palestinians or Israeli
So with your socalled ''impartiality'', you are closing your eyes
for a civilian population in need, which means a support de facto, to
the Israeli military attacks on Gaza
I hope you can live with that choice
Sincerely
Astrid Essed
Amsterdam
The Netherlands
