Stop de bezetting van palestina

Stop de bezetting
 Vrienden:
  1814 X
 Tegenstanders:
  123 X

Astrid Essed aan BBC: REFUSAL OF BROADCASTING IS NOT ''IMPARTIALITY'', BUT A DENIAL OF THE UNIVERSAL LAWS OF CIVILISATION

Reageer (0)





http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/01/bbc_and_the_gaza_appeal.html
 
 
BBC
HALL OF SHAME
REFUSAL OF BROADCASTING IS NOT ''IMPARTIALITY'', BUT A DENIAL OF THE UNIVERSAL LAWS OF CIVILISATION
 
 
Dear Mr Thompson and the BBC Staff,,
 
According to my opinion, the BBC  refusal to broadcast the DEC appeal for humanitarian help for Gaza, is a shameless denial of the universal humanitarian values, on which civilisation is based. 
 
Access for help-organisations to Gaza
 
I can be short about your practical argument of no access to the suffering Gazan civilian population, which is invalid, since the access is the problem of all humanitarian help-organisations, the International Red Cross included
Therefore it is not to the BBC, but to the public for deciding whether to donate or not
 
''Impartiality''
 
However, the most important is your fundamental objection, that your impartiality is at stake
 
I quote your reaction
 
''The danger for the BBC is that this could be interpreted as taking a political stance on an ongoing story. ''
 
Your socalled ''political'' argument is invalid, since  a political point of view is not at stake, but merely the humanitarian disaster of a civilian population
According to your line of thinking, no broadcasting could ever be done in any war-area, where the civilian population is victim, like Darfur, Congo etc
 
You know full well, that apart from ''taking sides'', the humanitarian disaster is caused by a kind of warfare, which violates International Humanitarian law, demanding a strict distinction between combatants [military and fighters] and non-combatants [civilians]
 
This is applicable  to ALL CONFLICTSPARTIES and not ''political'' at all
 
See International Humanitarian Law:
 
 
In this case however, the Gazan civilian population has been subjected to Israeli indiscriminate atracks with phosphorusbombs, which led to 1300 dead and more than 5000 wounded
 
Thousands of people are homeless
 
See the Red Cross
 
 
 
 
Hospitals have a lack of medicines by the continuing israeli blockade on Gaza
 
See the Red Cross:
 
 
Red Cross helpers were denied access to Gaza, ambulances were shoot at
 
As you have seen, my point of view is supported by the NEUTRAL International Red Cross
 
 
Mr Thompson, therefore a political point of view is not at stake here, nor the ''impartiality'' of the BBC, since it concerns the need of the civilian population, who always must be protected against the consequences of war, whether they are Palestinians or Israeli
 
So with your socalled ''impartiality'', you are closing your eyes for a civilian population in need, which means a support de facto, to the Israeli military attacks on Gaza
 
I hope you can live with that choice
 
Sincerely
 
Astrid Essed
Amsterdam
The Netherlands

« Terug naar Acties Media

Overzicht Reacties over dit Artikel

gebruikersnaam:
wachtwoord:
wachtwoord vergeten?
Sloop de muur help mee
Laaste reacties
datum: 06-02-2012 12:34
Over de dwaas van Buitenlandse Zaken, ik vraag mij af wat er nu gaat gebeuren nu er een Palestijnse ...
by dorus
datum: 02-02-2012 09:24
Je hebt gelijk Ben, en hoor je daar ooit iemand over? Meten met twee maten, het gebeurt telkens weer...
by yvonne
datum: 01-02-2012 11:31
Ik wijs er tevens op dat israel dit verdrag niet ondertekent heeft, ze heeft dit wapentuig in het ...
by benno
datum: 30-01-2012 19:39
volgens deze schrijver,spreekt god tot amerika

Door: Franklin ter Horst (Aangemaakt: ...

by benno
Hosted by Webspacedesign